What if time and space were NOT constant?
The ESTABLISHMENT wants you to believe that space, time, and the speed of light are all absolute.
However, this CONTRADICTORY!!!!
If you were on a train going at half the speed of light, and shone a flashlight ahead of you, to an outside observer, that light-beam would be travelling at 1.5c!!!!
Sherlock Holmes says, "Once you eliminate the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth."
If we realize that the laws of physics are constant in all reference frames, the speed of light should be absolute.
So, this leaves us with the realisation that space and time must NOT be constant!!!!
So what does this mean? Well, imagine the train scenario from before.
After the light-beam was emitted, it would appear to travel at the same speed on the outside and inside of the train.
This is because space and time itself are changing. Outside the train, we would see time slow down inside the train (time inflation) and see the train shrink along the axis of motion (length shrinkage).
Inside the train, we would see time outside speed up and see the world shrink along the axis of motion.
Really, I did the math and it works out. We can consider spacetime to be a four dimensional coordinate system (relative to any one inertial frame of reference) and say that these length shrinkages and time inflations are simply rotations of this coordinate system.
Even though you might call me CRAZY, I know I am right.