Image 1 — The spoiler's spoiler behaviour doesn't work with the spoiler's design
Image 2 — The spoiler's spoiler behaviour doesn't work with the spoiler's design
Image 3 — The spoiler's spoiler behaviour doesn't work with the spoiler's design

The spoiler's spoiler behaviour doesn't work with the spoiler's design

Mods removed the original post with hundreds of comments because apparently the name of a leviathan is a spoiler, so to all the people who made compelling and insightful comments in response to the post, sorry your discussion is lost to time.

Original Title: The Shiver Leviathan's pack riding behaviour doesn't work with the creature's design

Title is a statement, but really this is just my opinion. Feel free to disagree.

I am not sure what the consensus opinion on the Shiver Leviathan is, but personally I am not a fan of its implementation, and that largely comes from the creature's sexually dimorphic pack riding behaviour, where the smaller males will ride the females.

In the current build of the game, the way this behaviour works looks incredibly unnatural, as the males essentially snap off the female to chase the player. They then turn around, homing onto the female's position, and then snap back on. It looks very strange, but I understand that this may just be because the creature's animations have not been fully nailed down so far in early access. However, I don't think the unnatural look can be fully attributed to it being unfinished. Personally, I don't think the pack riding idea works with the design of the Shiver Leviathan.

We know the Shiver Leviathan's design wasn't created with this pack riding idea in mind, as the concept art was revealed and explained by the developers prior to release. The original concept art was designed under the idea of it being a solo predator, which was then revised when the developers began experimenting with the idea of it hunting with a pack of juveniles. However, this redesign for the pack hunting behaviour still didn't envision the idea of the smaller Shiver Leviathan's riding the larger one.

I say all this because what I find off about this behaviour in game is that the Shiver does not look like it is meant to have this behaviour. The individual design of these creatures looks good, but when you see them stacked on top of one another it looks very strange. Not strange in an alien design sense but in that it looks like a mistake. Since the design doesn't take into account how the males would latch onto the female, they just strangely float above it yet are able to mimic the female's exact movement, direction and position as if they were actually grabbing onto it. The males have to snap back to the exact specific position on the wing so that their outstretched wings don't clip into the female's body. The wings of the female have to remain static and outstretched because there is nowhere else for a male to fit on it once one is on the back. This significantly contributes to the unnatural look, because the static animations of the creature are now mandatory so this pack-riding behaviour can occur. Since the wings cannot be animated, the only part of the body that moves differently between the four is the tail, which a player is not going to be able to see very well as the creature attacks them from straight on, so often it looks like all four creatures are identically moving towards the player with incredibly static movements, like its animation is failing to play, rather than looking like four separate living creatures.

The idea of smaller males riding a larger female in a pack is a very interesting and unique concept for a leviathan, but I feel for this concept to work you would need to design the creature from the ground up with this idea in mind and incorporated into the design. I personally don't think the Shiver Leviathan's design is suited for this behaviour.

u/GalacticAnimations06 — 2 days ago

The Shiver Leviathan's pack riding behaviour doesn't work with the creature's design

Title is a statement, but really this is just my opinion. Feel free to disagree.

I am not sure what the consensus opinion on the Shiver Leviathan is, but personally I am not a fan of its implementation, and that largely comes from the creature's sexually dimorphic pack riding behaviour, where the smaller males will ride the females.

In the current build of the game, the way this behaviour works looks incredibly unnatural, as the males essentially snap off the female to chase the player. They then turn around, homing onto the female's position, and then snap back on. It looks very strange, but I understand that this may just be because the creature's animations have not been fully nailed down so far in early access. However, I don't think the unnatural look can be fully attributed to it being unfinished. Personally, I don't think the pack riding idea works with the design of the Shiver Leviathan.

We know the Shiver Leviathan's design wasn't created with this pack riding idea in mind, as the concept art was revealed and explained by the developers prior to release. The original concept art was designed under the idea of it being a solo predator, which was then revised when the developers began experimenting with the idea of it hunting with a pack of juveniles. However, this redesign for the pack hunting behaviour still didn't envision the idea of the smaller Shiver Leviathan's riding the larger one.

I say all this because what I find off about this behaviour in game is that the Shiver does not look like it is meant to have this behaviour. The individual design of these creatures looks good, but when you see them stacked on top of one another it looks very strange. Not strange in an alien design sense but in that it looks like a mistake. Since the design doesn't take into account how the males would latch onto the female, they just strangely float above it yet are able to mimic the female's exact movement, direction and position as if they were actually grabbing onto it. The males have to snap back to the exact specific position on the wing so that their outstretched wings don't clip into the female's body. The wings of the female have to remain static and outstretched because there is nowhere else for a male to fit on it once one is on the back. This significantly contributes to the unnatural look, because the static animations of the creature are now mandatory so this pack-riding behaviour can occur. Since the wings cannot be animated, the only part of the body that moves differently between the four is the tail, which a player is not going to be able to see very well as the creature attacks them from straight on, so often it looks like all four creatures are identically moving towards the player with incredibly static movements, like its animation is failing to play, rather than looking like four separate living creatures.

The idea of smaller males riding a larger female in a pack is a very interesting and unique concept for a leviathan, but I feel for this concept to work you would need to design the creature from the ground up with this idea in mind and incorporated into the design. I personally don't think the Shiver Leviathan's design is suited for this behaviour.

u/GalacticAnimations06 — 2 days ago

"Complaining" is still useful feedback for an early access game

This is in response to a lot of comments on that recent post about how people are shutting down criticism because the game is in early access.

A lot of comments on the post were saying people where only doing this to posts that were "complaining" rather than providing "constructive criticism". I have seen many post that show this is not the case, because posts giving constructive criticism still have people responding with the defence of the game being in early access to negate the criticism. Regardless, complaints, just saying you don't like a part of the game without identifying the specific issue or offering alternatives to fix it, is still good feedback for the game to receive it highlights to the devs aspects of the game that are in some way flawed. It is not a player's job to come up with a solution or identify the problem, it is the developers, because more often than not player suggestions do not solve the underlining issue.

I can't remember who said this, I think it actually might have been the game director of the first Subnautica but don't quote me on that, but they said players are really good at knowing when they don't like something, but they are really bad at knowing what they want different in response to that. Many people may be complaining about X and saying you should change Y to fix it. When the game developer looks into these complaints and investigates the issue, they may realise that the annoyance towards X isn't due to how Y operates, but instead because of an issue with Z. Having players only complaining about X is just as useful as having players complain about X with the suggestion of changing Y, because both are telling the developer that there is an issue with X that they need to investigate and solve.

I really wish I remembered what Subnautica's game director used as their example for this with the first game's early access, but unfortunately I don't. If anyone else does remember please say what it was in the comments, but regardless we've already seen this occur with Subnautica 2's early access.

Many players had issue with creature aggression. "Complaining" players said the creatures were annoying, and players giving "constructive criticism" largely suggested giving players the ability to kill hostile creatures. Unknown Worlds looked at this large amount of criticism and instead understood that the root cause of the issue was the unintuitive nature of the defence tools available to the player, leading to players feeling they didn't have a meaningful way to defend themselves. The issue was not the inability to kill fish as the "constructive criticism" was suggesting.

Unknown Worlds are now focusing on improving the player's current defensive toolset and implementing new methods for players to evade, avoid and defend against predators. Both the players "complaining" and the players giving "constructive criticism" led to this change. Neither type of feedback should be silenced or invalidated as they are both essential to the game's improvement over early access.

reddit.com
u/GalacticAnimations06 — 5 days ago
▲ 1.5k r/subnautica

A summary of what's coming to the game in the near future

So the developers just released a devlog going over what's coming to the game in the near future https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=TnnucBrqeKQ I thought I would make a text post summarising what is coming so it's easier to see at a glance

Coming soon

  • Multiple passive biomods slots will be unlockable, meaning you can have more than one passive biomod at the same time
  • More biomods will be added to the early game
  • Improvements to wreck exploration
  • Better telegraphed blight behaviour
  • A priority system for dialogue to ensure the player can always hear important dialogue uninterrupted
  • The ability to replay voicelogs from the PDA databank
  • Player emotes
  • More character customisation options
  • Proximity voice chat

Further down the road

  • New region that will be the home of the Collector Leviathan. You will NOT have to restart your save to experience this new region. It will continue the story where the current build of the game left off.
  • New resources to be found in upcoming region
  • New creatures to be found in upcoming region, including an eel-like creature with many teeth and four webbed-like mandibles across its upper body.
  • A Prawn Suit equivalent chassis for the Tadpole
u/GalacticAnimations06 — 5 days ago

In defence of the flooding of Gotham

Arguably the biggest criticism that is held against The Batman, even by fans of the film, is that Riddler's decision to flood Gotham in the third act feels like it comes out of nowhere. Riddler goes from a murderous vigilante who is targeting the perpetrators of corruption and oppression in Gotham, to indiscriminately killing thousands of people. I've seen people say it was included because the film needed a big spectacle for the third act, or so that the audience didn't sympathise with Riddler's ideology.

I've also held a similar belief in regards to the film for a while. I still really enjoyed the third act of the film, but I did agree with the perspective that it felt somewhat out of character for Riddler to escalate to flooding the city.

However, I have come to understand why the narrative takes this turn, and now I actually don't think it is out of character for Riddler at all. The deleted scene between Joker and Batman in Arkham State Hospital sums up why

>Batman: "You think his motive is political?
Joker: "Oh, no, no ,no. This is very, very personal. He feels these people have all wronged him."

Riddler doesn't have a political goal with his vigilantism. He's not killing political figures and unmasking corruption in Gotham with the goal of improving the city. In essence, he's an oppressed individual who is finally lashing out. essentially just an oppressed person who is finally lashing out.

Riddler doesn't view his crusade as 'the upper class vs the upper class' or 'the oppressed vs the oppressors." He sees it as 'me against the city'. He sees Gotham as an entity. Gotham is the one that made him live in a severely underfunded orphanage where infant mortality was a yearly occurrence. Gotham is the one that left him, a very neurodivergent coded character based on his scenes in Arkham, out to dry with no safety net or support. He doesn't differentiate the Mayor from the Commissioner from the DA from the average citizen. They are all the same to him, they represent Gotham, they are Gotham. He is angry at everyone, the flood is his vengeance against and punishment for the world that made him suffer. He's not doing any of this to change or improve Gotham like Batman's quest of vengeance is at least built on. Riddler is so far gone he doesn't consider the concept of positive change in his life nor the world as possible. He has lived in a state of oppression so long that his identity has just melded into any way of gaining a sembelence of control and autonomy over his being. He is an example of, and what I hope the future films explore further, what happens when oppression reaches a boiling point. Someone like Riddler was bound to arise from the conditions of Gotham.

Under this viewpoint of the character I think Riddler's actions in the film do make sense. Even still, I will admit I found The Penguin series having it be "the flood mostly affected the poorer neighbourhoods whilst the rich neighbourhoods were left unscathed" was an on the nose decision. Having it be that Riddler actually further harmed people who are oppressed like he was while leaving the oppressors unscathed in an attempt at irony just seems like a way to cleanse the narrative of dealing with the idea that the oppression of people is what led to someone like Riddler arising. It's moving the blame of the current systemic inequities caused by the flood solely onto the Riddler instead of looking further into how pre-existing inequities led to the rise of the Riddler in the first place. I'm hoping the second film doesn't just leave the exploration of the Riddler as "he was a lunatic" and does further explore how Gotham's conditions made the Riddler.

reddit.com
u/GalacticAnimations06 — 10 days ago
▲ 7 r/curtin

I have a CAP plan that gives me an extra 5 days for assignments. For this assessment I went into the 5 days, and I wanted to do a similarity report before I made my submission, but because the Turnitin submission deadlines are set for the non CAP plan date if I submit my assignment during that 5 day extension period I can't then resubmit it.

So to get my Turnitin similarity report I actually went to Turnitin.com and logged in as a student, and found that one of my classes had a practice submission point there, so I submitted my essay and got the Turnitin report, which gave me a 21%. However doing it this way seems to have added my essay into Turnitin's database, because when I uploaded the essay to the submission point on Blackboard the similarity report is 95% and is highlighting every part of my essay except for the section I rewrote after the initial similarity report, stating it is from "Curtin University of Technology private content".

I'm just wondering if anyone has some advice on what I should do? Will the markers be able to see that it's just highlighting my essay that is in the database?

reddit.com
u/GalacticAnimations06 — 1 month ago