u/Heart_Fort2001

Often times it is not thought about much but in the world there has always even demand for environments that can act as bastions of order against chaos, before Victorian and Enlightenment + American Protestant or Abrahamic modern patriarchy we had these kinds of societies that were very moralistic and community based, but where women could be warriors or providers for guys.

Examples would maybe be the Celts as most famous or even certain Germanic tribes. While women were free to own property, be providers to men or warriors they still very harshly punished betraying partners or oathbreaking and breach of promise, trust, etc. Agreed and announced relationships (Monogamous or Open Non-Monogamous) were very harshly enforced too against breach of trust.

Among people there's always been a demand for certainty or frameworks of trust. So you can be moralistic but also in ways that reject patriarchy and gender roles or masculinity, perhaps even reform it to chip away any bits of it left but still be moralistic, discipline and emphasising duty.

This is probably the most ideal framework for RR people or so on you think? If not then atleast for people in RR who want moralistic, discipline based and very duty based frameworks without any patriarchal elements defining it?

Moralistic, discipline based and duty bound frameworks did not come from Abrahamic religions though they stole the credit or added unnecessary additional patriarchal baggage. They came from "Archaic societies" like Celts or before who were figuring out how to build frameworks and societies to tame chaos and figuring out what steps were needed to re-engineer and domesticate evolution of not just animals, but humans. Many could be quite RR I think or tolerated it alot, and its where both Proto-Monogamy and "Agreed Relationships" also came from I think.

I do not want to limit the post to just Queensland but thought it would help to mention.

Some are saying that one of the best ways to fight back is to join a tenants union or to have protests which call them out meant to raise awareness and provide rallying points where people can organise even more.

Which would be more effective or what Tenants Unions and awareness raising protests are best?

Most importantly, also you need leverage or to create enough leverage to change things.

Like everytime you try to look for the pink pyjamas with white or red patterns on them that are everywhere for guys in the U.S and EU, the Australian retail websites or Australian Amazon default to women's only clothes sizes. Even if you input UNISEX in filters it still defaults to "women's clothing" and all less than XL.

Even styles of hats are separated by gender too, and if you ask for a certain woven hat the stores say "Thats women's only". Styles are still divided into gender and Australia fucking sucks ass in this aspect.

If you try to get on Amazon and look at the U.S sites it says "Will not ship to your location". Apart from that does Australia just suck for RR people just as much as ND people? Perhaps worse than Japan and France or what?

I heard it is likewise similar for RR women in that clothing sizes cap at 14/16 and don't go beyond 2XL or into 20/22 like U.S brands do.

I hope these "local Australian fashion stores" get taken over or shutdown as soon as possible by any aggressive multinationals and I wish there was a way I could help multinationals get in and sweep them out.

Cause like howcome in the U.S clothing stores styles or patterns are less gendered despite Trump and whatever?

Are there any artworks of what the shallow inland sea looked like back then vs or what it would look like if it was brought back today?

What would happen if through some kind of geoengineering project (Whether through Australian government somehow doing it or hyopothetically a large superpower like the U.S/China) it was reflooded from the worldwide ocean or pacific sea in general?

Would Australia have more habitable land people can buy homes on? What would happen?