r/FakeGuru_Expose

Siam Kidd’s DSV CryptoCurrency HedgeFund Pitch Exposed - Breakdown by YouTuber Bobby02

Siam Kidd’s DSV CryptoCurrency HedgeFund Pitch Exposed - Breakdown by YouTuber Bobby02

  Siam Kidd’s DSV CryptoCurrency HedgeFund Pitch Exposed - Breakdown by YouTuber Bobby02 

All Credit goes to YouTuber Bobby 02 for this - Siam Kidd recently did a sales pitch in London promoting his multi million dollar hedge fund  Cryptocurrency fund- DSV Fund he highlighted the advantages of cryptocurrency  bittensor- Siam Kidd had previously been posted on fake guru numerous times - info is here - just to serve as a warning for those thinking of investing in him his pitch is heavily flawed and needs to be properly analysed and scrutinised to reveal he is a "fake guru" 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wF6_kNYn7ck 

Twitter video in case Siam deletes the YouTube :
https://x.com/i/status/2074163775943393341

Youtuber BobbyO2 Debunks the weaknesses of cryptocurrency guru Siam Kid's sales pitch in regards to bittensor the crypocurrency behind Siam Kidd's Crypto Hedgefund DSV Fund. Anyone considering to invest in this hedgdfund please take this video into consideration before investing.

Keep in Mind there is other evidence on fake the guru subreddit in regards to Siam Kidd with evidence that he could be a scammer this is not the first post regarding him. He has since closes his crypto trading course to the public and opened a cryptocurrency hedgefund which uses investor funds to buy the alt coin bittensor. Siam has been hosting pitches in London this month this recent video by YouTuber bobby02 debunks the pitch and explains why it’s a scam and shouldn’t be invested in. Before going into the details there are some allegations of Siam Kidd’s shady wrongdoings in the past:

https://www.reddit.com/r/bittensor_/s/s6Fe8K5qNZ

https://www.reddit.com/r/FakeGuru/s/nAXrk1dR6L

https://www.reddit.com/r/FakeGuru/s/gEuwJ566vX

https://www.reddit.com/r/CryptoScams/s/xqF32LaBgE

Alot of evidence to suggest that Siam has done manipulative stuff most notably telling his paid discord to hold dtao whilst he would quietly dump and use them as exit liquidty alot of the screenshots suggest that people got seriously hurt by his actions. Siam and Mark have evidence they are  clear manipulators who used Siam's paid group as their exit liquidty

Interestingly enough after the reddit fake guru posts were made Siam shut down his trading group and then opened a cryptocurrency hedgefund- DSV reciving millions in investment this post serves as a warning to deter people from investing. 

Exposing the cryptocurrency hedgefund pitch as a fraud:

  1. Siam’s typical “overhype” "Third Great Network" Analogy
    Siam compares his cryptocurrency Bittensor to TCP/IP/internet (info transfer) and Bitcoin (value transfer) as the third network enabling intelligence creation/transfer - which is just ridiculous plain and simple as Bittensor hasn’t proven anything yet or has created anything of value 
    This is massive hype. The presenter  Sam avoids open debate when challenged, which undermines credibility he ignored Bobby02’s permission to debate rewording it as “no interest in stepping into an ambush”  proof: 
    https://x.com/SiamKidd/status/2073521829382148452?s=20

Crypto is full of similar unbacked "this changes everything" claims - Siam once again uses that Same argument that every chain tries to make that they are the the next “google” . No real evidence of revolutionary problem-solving or sustainable innovation beyond subsidized activity which has it’s issues with corruption and trust. Siam just makes a point and never brings any evidence to justify it- it’s just sleazy sales marketing. 

  1. Misleading Alphabet/Google Umbrella Ownership Comparison
    Siam likens holding TAO to owning Alphabet (Google) stock, where one token captures value from many successful "subsidiaries" (subnets/AI projects) under the protocol.
    Key issues with this :
    No real ownership: TAO holders have no controlling stake or governance over individual subnets. Successful subnets/teams can leave, pivot, or get acquired by big tech (e.g., Google) without TAO holders benefiting meaningfully.
    Subnets are independent; teams can "peace out" and take their tech/revenue. Alpha token holders in subnets may see price collapse, while TAO sees limited/no upside which has already occurred with several rugs. 
    Contrast with Alphabet: Google truly owns subsidiaries—executives can't just spin out freely without consequences. Bittensor lacks this centralised ownership/enforcement which Siam never addresses. 
  2. Value Capture and Incentive Problems
    Critique argues TAO's value capture mechanism is flawed compared to traditional equity. Subnets can generate revenue independently but aren't structurally tied to reward TAO holders proportionally in a durable way.
    Many subnets are heavily subsidized via emissions; once subsidies aren't needed, teams have incentives to exit or be acquired externally. TAO/alpha holders are left "holding the bag." 
  3. Broader Pitch Issues (Hype vs. Reality)
    The presentation is seen as overly promotional/salesy for TAO and the ecosystem (Siam runs a Bittensor-focused hedge fund) which fits in line with a lot of the trust pilot reviews for Siam’s “The Realistic Trader” which point out to him being a sleazy salesman -  
    https://uk.trustpilot.com/reviews/6951721d8ff02f193f5713d9
    https://uk.trustpilot.com/reviews/689880e454fa5a2fa932ebb5
    https://uk.trustpilot.com/reviews/656a3afab4624be5a2a0f41f - one review from ex-customer Steve actually refers to him as a sleazy salesman directly. 
    Questions the real innovation, product-market fit, and long-term viability beyond current incentives. Subnets viewed more as subsidy farmers than sustainable businesses in the critique - a lot of them have high apys which serve to kill the subnet longterm which the inflationary pressure and sell pressure. 
    Overall tone of the critique: Siam's analogies sound plausible on the surface for beginners but fall apart under scrutiny regarding ownership, alignment of incentives, and enforceable value accrual to TAO holders meaning this is the same crypto ponzi as the others and the reluctance to debate is repeatedly called out as telling.

Other shady info regarding Siam Kidd and Mark Creaser:
Siam Kidd and Mark Creaser’s PLC-company Astrid or known as Subnet 127- share price concerns-

https://shareprophets.com/views/86955/expose-astrid-intelligence-more-red-flags-vicar-siam-kidd-seems-quite-a-fun-guy

Customer complaints about astrid:
https://x.com/crisismid6854/status/2074799860142813555?s=4
Accusation they allegedly stole the placing funds: https://x.com/thekfchunter/status/2073513298050335021?s=46

youtube.com
u/coryroryrodgers — 10 days ago