Best Indian Catchers (only catching not fielding)
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post
This post contains content not supported on old Reddit. Click here to view the full post
Just can’t bat or bowl and ofc a terrible terrible fielder
There has been a lot of buzz over the last couple of days that the upcoming ODI at Lord's could be Rohit Sharma's final match in the format. Some reports claim he's no longer part of India's long-term ODI plans for the 2027 World Cup, while others say no official decision has been made.
At the same time, India's batting coach has publicly backed Rohit, saying he's experienced enough to bounce back despite recent criticism. So far, neither Rohit nor the BCCI has confirmed any retirement plans.
What do you all think?
Interested to hear everyone's thoughts.
My friend and I were debating whether adding cricket to the Olympics is ultimately a good or bad thing, especially from India’s perspective.
My view is that it’s a positive change. Cricket has an enormous fanbase, and I think a lot of people who normally wouldn’t watch the Olympics will tune in because of cricket. Once they’re already watching, some of them might end up discovering and following other sports like wrestling, badminton, shooting, athletics, hockey, etc. If Olympic viewership increases overall, it could also attract more sponsors and investment, which might benefit other sports in the long run.
My friend’s argument is the opposite. He thinks cricket will completely overshadow the other events in India. According to him, if India wins an Olympic gold in cricket, the public and media will mostly focus on that achievement and pay less attention to athletes who have spent years competing in less popular sports. He believes this could make it even harder for those athletes to get recognition, sponsorships, and support.
So I’m curious what others think.
There are tensions in dressing room but not confirmed yet. Gautam gambhir was chatting with Rohit sharma with such positive attitude after match ~ As a secondary support staff in Indian bowling lineup, I can make you guys sure these are all rumors. Rohit sharma is going to West Indies for next ODI in September.
Tell the score which kholi will score in the 1st ODI against England.
Virat Kohli now practising on the ground for First ODI.
With recent whitewashes, here are a few things I felt:
No role clarity among the players
Situation awareness
Too many continuous changes
Uncertainty of the plan
The batting order is not stable.
Too many left-handers in the batting lineup.
The squad:
Abhishek Sharma - Go all in from ball 1. Play his natural style.
Sanju Samson (wk) - Best in Wicketkeeping skills. On his day, he can win you any matches. Needs to stay longer on the crease. Needs to stay consistent.
I Kishan
S Iyer (c)
Rajat Patidar - Can play spin very well. Very much aware of the situation. Can accelerate when needed.
Hardik Pandya - Has the strength to go from ball 1. Can give you a sure-shot 4 overs. Needs to improve on fitness
V Iyer - Floater (batting allrounder) - based on match situation, can bat any part of the innings. Also, can give 2-3 overs of bowling.
Axar Patel - Can bat if needed, thus strengthens the lower order. Can give you a few tight overs. Good Fielder
Kuldeep Yadav - Can give a few tight overs in the middle of the innings. Needs to improve in fielding.
Bhuvi - One of the best bowling minds in the game. Highly experienced and can give early breakthroughs as well as can give you tight overs at the end with Bumrah.
Bumrah - Bumrah.
Why not included:
Why this team will do better.
Role Clarity for everyone.
Players picked can accelerate or anchor the innings smoothly.
The bowling lineup is experienced.
Depth in the batting lineup with more specialised batters.
The team is mostly based on the IPL. Sorry if any spelling errors.
What's your take?
Well, as a fan; the new format for cricket is an absolute disgrace. It's just BCCI and Indian broadcasters trying to mint more money by fixing more than 1 India-Pakistan or India-Australia clashes. Cricket World Cup is going to lose more credibility due to this, and maybe this might be the last of them before we see T20 World Cups, with lowest viewership out of the subcontinent, becoming the ultimate prize of cricket. However something which intrigued me in the format was the Super Series, and I've always thought of this as something which could fix the 50-over Cricket World Cup, if used efficiently.
Here is my proposed 'DREAM FORMAT' for the (50-over) ICC Men's Cricket World Cup, which requires no Qualifiers, and is based totally on ODI rankings.
-> All 20 ODI playing nations qualify, such that:
• Top 14 teams qualify directly into the Group Stage
• Rank 15th to Rank 20th play the Play-In/Super Series
-> Play-In would look like: G1: R15* R17 R19; G2: R16* R18 R20
• Top team(*) from each Group of the Play-In qualify for the Group Stage
-> Group Stage:
• 14(Qualified)+2(Play-In)=16 teams, divided into 4 groups of 4 each.
• Top 2 from each Group qualify for the Super 8
-> Super 8:
• Similar to the Champions Trophy
• 2 groups of 4 each
• Top 2 teams of each group qualify for the Semi Finals
-> Knockouts: SFs and F
This would help in not only making Cricket World Cup, arguably Cricket's oldest and biggest stage, accessible to all playing nations, but would also decrease ICCs burden on conducting unnecessary Qualifier tournaments no one pays attention to. Also, it would protect the competitiveness of the tournament, which ICC has been using to cover their money printing; as each Stage is competitive. Each group stage is of 4 teams each, making each match a must win. What do you say? Open to all sorts of opinions.
PS: The Group Stage and Play-Ins must be played simultaneously. Sounds absurd but for the first few days, 2 matches per day (1 of Group Stage and 1 of Play-In) could be done. As soon as Play-In is over, the Group Stage continues with the newly joined teams.