r/Neo_Libertatia

So i thought that ACP plant i was talking about last night was done here, but apparently not. I saw a post of theirs in response to me that was so ass that i couldn't ignore it, leading me to writing this post. So the first half is gonna be me debunking it and the second half is just ranting about assimilationists lol

Their claim: tolerance is not only better than acceptance, but also more genuine. Bitch, what drugs have you been taking lmao? Tolerance is essentially "i don't like you, but i'm gonna put up with you", which couldn't be more fake, if you hate me i'd rather you be direct about it rather than trying to be sneaky about it lol. This is the issue with liberalism in general, just the emphasis on tolerance over actual acceptance. While at first this sounds reasonable, logically not everyone is going to like each other, people can only put up a front for so long, ESPECIALLY if the society you live in has deeply rooted racism and classism baked into it. As legal progress is made more tolerance is expected, but that racism didn't go away. When the civil rights act was written, we didn't stop having these racists, they just changed their language over time. Instead of saying black people directly, they say "criminals", "thugs", "welfare queens", "dei", etc. But what happens under a liberal society again? Eventually it leads to authoritarianism. Fascism is the final stage of capitalism inevitably, as a socialist i'd think one would know this. If reactionary thought is baked into your system, no amount of "tolerance" is gonna make that go away. It's just gonna allow intolerant people to get more of a voice and get more power, which historically came at the detriment of people who are more oppressed. Go on, make that subreddit of yours with your five followers and negative downvotes that you claim makes you so famous (i only bring that up because they did lmao). See if you're still gonna have only "mildly" reactionary people by the end of it. See, another flaw with the idea of the tolerance is the fact that you still don't like that group of people, which will inevitably imply a betrayal even if you're willing to temporarily put your differences aside. I can tell this person doesn't belong to any oppressed group because this is getting ridiculous. Sure, it may not be deceptive if you're honest about it, which apparently this person is, but at the same time there's not really any other way to look at it, because as soon as it is "forced" onto you, aka it ends up affecting you in some way, you freak out. The thing is tho, ofc it's going to evolve outside of their own little bubble, that's just how things work. You can't just have a "separate but equal" mentality (we'll get to that later), because how did that go again? Oh yeah, it had lynchings, segregation, klansmen, all the works. Because that's how it inevitably ends up, so the solution is change in both society and yourself. Speaking of which, this person claims that they tried to kill off some of their reactionary beliefs but couldn't. Lmao. Despite what you might claim, i don't think that's an issue for most people if they weren't genuinely bigoted. Now, if you want to have a genuinely accepting society, it begins with understanding, or Gnosis if you wanna get spiritual about it. This ofc begins with yourself. When you are trans, for example, you evaluate your life both past and present, you challenge pre-concieved notions about yourself and gender, and what society has told you about it. Everyone is told at a young age what's what in regards to that stuff, subconsciously or otherwise. When you realize that's fundamentally wrong, you begin to ask yourself: "what else have i been led to believe that isn't true?" Obviously it's different for everyone but logically that's how it goes a lot of the time, that's why a lot of trans people, or any oppressed group for that matter, naturally gravitate towards the left. And nobody said that gaining this new understanding is easy, it takes a LONG ass time to get it fully formed. To give up because it's "not within your nature" or whatever is lazy and shows how weakness in your soul. It just shows a lack of insight or knowledge which led me to be surprised how you became a socialist in the first place (ignoring the praise of Gorbachev, who was the guy who made a 180 on socialism when visiting an american grocery store and turn the ussr from state capitalist to regular capitalist russia, interestingly lmao). It's no wonder you settle for tolerance, there's no desire to make a major change in yourself or in society, there's no putting in that self reflection or that work. This is why socially you're no better than the average white liberal. Now let's see if you ask the white leftist question: why worry about "identity politics" at all?

See, there are two ways to look at identity politics: equality under the system and liberation from the system. The former is that liberal assimilationist kind, where it's about achieving the same legalities and representation and such without actually challenging the system itself. It overlooks class, overarching racism or bigotry by viewing it as an individual issue rather than an institutional one, and just want us to "be nice" to appease the white/cishet/whatever majority. When you just settle for that tho, what you get in the end is just assimilating into a death cult. Wanting the right to serve the military, for example? Congrats, now you get to be in the front lines and bomb middle eastern children like all the other people around you. Does that sound free to you? It's essentially trying to get the same privileges as the dominant demographic. In other words, it's an absolute joke at best and a betrayal at worst. Stop trying to appeal to them and being a pick-me because they're not going to pick you, when things get bad who's gonna stick up for you? Not the dominant demographic, that's for sure. No wonder why nobody can take liberal queers seriously, who would? The SECOND type of identity politics is crucial, however: the actual deconstruction of these systems and institutions, viewing issues of race and gender as inseparable from class issues as they are, allows for actual authenticity and experimentation, and is integral to any leftist struggle. You can't abolish class without getting rid of everything else that goes with it. In mainstream political discourse, there has been too much of an emphasis on the first kind of identity politics, which is shallow and just waters us down to appeal to the majority. We call out hitler and trump for being terrible, rightfully so, ignoring the fact that they weren't the only ones like that, just the biggest figures. They're simply the largest symptom, not the root disease. We can't change things just by getting rid of the one bad guy, you have to gut out why that came into fruition in the first place. This logic applies to everything, really. It's deeper than mere ideology or mundane party politics, it goes deeper. Transness for example shows how malleable things actually are, and that threatens the fabric of what the rightoid system has built up forever. It is inherently political, and white cishets like to pretend otherwise. The performance of gender does not mean that it's meaningless, separate from the material aspects of it, but rather it is a declaration of the two merging. To assert that this is the reality and i will shape it on my own terms to feel more comfortable with myself. Even cis people do this, like with gender reveal parties. To quote Xenogothic, "...‘gender reveal parties’, which are a far more recent performative ritual used to approve the signifying regime one is to be coached in from birth onwards. They are performative because pronouncements like “It’s a boy!” or “It’s a girl!” are just as consequential as the declaration “I now pronounce you man and wife.” This observation unfolds in two directions: on the one hand, this sort of declaration is consequential because it will define your life in a meaningful and material way; on the other, if we were to declare that this declaration of gender is final and immutable, then we might as well regress to a time when divorce is no longer legal also… This, however, is seldom appreciated, heightening certain contradictions in our societal infrastructure." Transness is about asserting your own autonomy and declaring your own independence from the previous dogma, and assimilationists take that logic and spit on it by trying to fit into the dominant system. This is what tolerance also implies, assimilation. Like "ok, you can join us as long as you behave yourself" mentality that assimilationists tend to jump on. The thing is, you can apply the inherent logic of transness i described and apply it to literally anything. Gender is merely a hyperstition, a spook, and a performance as stated earlier, and many things follow the same category. The more you get others to understand that and make an actual effort to deconstruct the previous worldview, thus achieving a revolution of sorts (both cultural and economic), the closer to success you are. The further you go with this, the better. You can't fully blame assimilationists for thinking the way they do, this is the fault of the system they live in above all else, which is exactly why it must be done away with in order for genuine acceptance to take place

You can't tolerate those who even have a HINT of discriminatory thought towards a certain group for no reason other than their self-righteousness as a christian, thus proving that religion must be kept separate from politics because otherwise you'll have the same western christian liberal logic evident in everything wrong with america, no matter how tolerant or socialist you claim to be. The revolution is cultural as well as economic, and therefore chuddiness can not be accepted. What are they gonna contribute, repetitive slop content?

Social conservatism is a disease that we won't let into the sub. Even if you have the "oh i'm not gonna force you" kind of mentality you're still having those views, is that not bad enough? "Oh i fucking HATE gay people, but just stay away from me and tolerate me and we'll be fine, don't force each other's shit on each other". You see how dumb that sounds? That's what they sound like, then they go in your dms and throw insults at you that aren't even accurate, mind you lol. Ever hear of the paradox of tolerance? Your logic doesn't even apply if you start mentioning your views every chance you get. Such a privileged stance that you can't even admit to holding lmao

No, i'm not just gonna "coexist" with casual reactionaries, the goal here isn't tolerance, what do you take me for, a liberal? It's genuine acceptance, openness, and embrace of other's differences, which paradoxically starts with getting rid of philosophies which directly contradict that sentiment so we don't have them gain dominance. Look at what happened to the incels. Reactionaries will be banned from here, just reminding you that. If you wander within a forest, don't be surprised to find creatures there. Just saying

Blessed is the lion that the human will eat, so that the lion becomes human. And cursed is the human that the lion will eat, and the lion still will become human.

I remember my mum always found it a travesty that schools didn’t teach idioms as a part of their language construction

Such as “too many cooks ruin the broth”
“Poisoning the well”
“Anarchy is order government is civil war”
“With great power comes great ir-responsibility.”

When Shawn Wilbur in anarchy insides and outsides says that

“anarchy is one of those things that, as we say in less serious contexts, “you can’t unsee.” It started as a look outside—and gradually became a kind of being outside—which has always mixed uncomfortably with the often strict border-patrolling characteristic of the milieu.
The outside that characterizes anarchy is not just the outsider status that brought so many of us to the brink. That, as I think most of us recognize, is a relative thing, entirely compatible with various inversions and the creation of new kinds of INSIDER status.
“

INtrusion/INtruder/

BORDERS CONTROL EXCLUSION

KIM DOVEY CALLED SHOPPING MALLS INVERTED PRISONS

When they identified it with order, it was not in any way that ought to make any “law and order” crowd feel safe™

“Chances are pretty good that what we fear most is UNCERTAINTY .”

“The overwhelming emphasis on authority in our culture probably makes us place too high a value on our own rebellion. In our truly authoritarian societies, virtually EVERYTHING we would like to do is in some sense controlled or mediated by authority, so once we have embraced the position of anarchist—dedicated opponent of all of that—everything we do seems to be a part of our struggle. But there’s a real danger of turning anarchy into just another absolute”

I was love to think of the text state languages and state territories by Peter Gelderloos

It’s like vernacular/aesthetic vs street level order 🏴🫆

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/peter-gelderloos-state-languages-and-territorial-languages

https://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/xavier-oliveras-gonzalez-deny-anarchic-spaces-and-places-an-anarchist-critique-of-mosaic-statis

https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdUXXGCfkyrReLqjZFRTNbaYHPWGszky0_bdTGDr9RZNV-9GQ/viewform

hello! because it is a world cup year i am doing something different and doing an additional marx madness tournament specifically for the world cup

the marx madness world cup survey form has been officially released for 2026. please fill out the form by selecting as many or as little people who you have been influenced by politically.

if there is someone you have been influenced by who has not been included (especially if it’s from a country/region/nation where only a few/no ppl were listed), please let me know and their inclusion will be heavily considered

if there are any questions at all please let me know!!the poll will run until may 24th!

i would also encourage ppl to name search if they haven’t found someone as people may be listed under a particular country/region/nation based on their ancestry

the results will be announced on the twitter account @transjewtalian on march 24th

This kinda just turned into a rant about bigotry but yk lmao

Never trust any space or movement that only focuses on a single issue. Well, at least in terms of politics. If you wanna go in an a trans subreddit or something, that's not the issue. Minorities gotta stick together. But in politics? Yeah that's an issue. I used to frequent a sub some of you may have heard about called r/TransgendersAtWar . I've heard rumors of it being a psyop and tbh i can kinda see that being the case. But in any case, the sub was essentially just bigotry showcasing in the end and i feel like they were limiting their potential. The only rule was to be transgender or frequent trans subs, preferably both. Now, and i did ask the founder, what about transmed subs or shit like that which would exclude enbies? She replied it doesn't matter as long as they're trans. To this day i am baffled by such a response. If it weren't for me occasionally posting my signature schizo babble the sub would just be your average liberal slopfest (tho that might be my bias as someone whose background is in more niche philosophies lol). Despite these, i was always down to do whatever is around to help trans people and be in a community of people like me, so i brushed most of it off (except the transmed thing, tho that was around the time i was leaving the sub anyway). Also, how did i not notice the ai generated banner before? Anywho, i began to see her have views on transmascs which were questionable at best (i'm sure i'm downplaying it unintentionally but idk the full extent of it tbh), and that kinda confirmed my suspicions i had towards the sub. I eventually left the sub and decided to make my own place to post my thoughts instead, and thus it was one of the driving factors towards me making this sub. After that i occasionally made a comment critiquing something before i stopped interacting with it entirely. At least two of the mods are just her in different alt accounts. I was briefly a mod there myself in fact, she invited me and i accepted, and i voluntarily stepped down for the reasons i previously mentioned as well as me prioritizing my own stuff. Psyop or not the sub kinda sucked in general, tho it did teach me a thing or two about expanding my own, so i should thank her for that lmao

And it's not just that sub either. Maybe they don't have the same issues as that sub but many of them do have another one: racism. This doesn't just go to trans focused subs either, it can also be feminist subs and shit like that. All of it is just very centered around white people, and people of color are often left out of the conversation. It's rather isolating. Perhaps they only find european beauty standards as the correct one, despite claiming otherwise. Or in feminist subs in regards to the middle east, which is rather oppressive to women, i'm not saying otherwise, but what is their response to it? Any woman who wears a hijab, whether it is her choice or not, is forced to and must have it be taken away to "free" them. The same colonialist logic you hear from chuds. I think it goes without saying how hypocritical that is, right? Honestly it's not even a single issue thing either. Ok, so take r/SipsTea . The posts themselves are fine, it's whatever, but the comments are the real issue here. I was appalled to see how much racism there was towards India and Muslims, and how normalized the whole thing is. They claim to be so progressive otherwise, and yet here they are acting like they're subhuman freaks simply due to their race or where they're from. Orientalism never went away, it just got adopted into instagram comment sections and white people cope. Because the governments there are shitty (which is almost always the fault of western intervention btw, gotta love it when they destabilize other nations, bomb villages, steal their resources and suppress their culture leaving them worse off than they were before /sar), the people must be on that same level, which is just nonsense. See, if you look at history, despite what white supremacists like to claim, europe wasn't the pinnacle of culture and civilization. Asia, africa, south america, central america, etc, ALL had complex civilizations, cultures, ways of living, resources, etc. Even the nazis knew this, so they tried to say shit like "umm actually they were aryan" when they came across something more advanced than them or something they liked. Under colonialism, all of many of that shit was taken away, assimilated into a new language and way of life that they never asked for, and have been taught that their culture is inherently lesser, it's been us for many years. My mom was the daughter of haitian immigrants, and while she was in high school she was embarrassed of it for a bit, and thankfully she embraced it and continues to embrace it since. Haiti is a hellscape now and a big part of it is because of western intervention and the us and other western european countries making it their mission to rape the entire rest of the planet. I also found out i have some Taino ancestry, who have been long thought to have been extinct it was so bad. When a country is seen as more "modern", and i've noticed this since looking at japanese history several years back, what they really mean is "more western". The more you have assimilated, the more you are accepted, and yet you will always be seen as lesser. And yet white supremacists use all this as ammo against minorities, to make them feel like shit and to justify what they're doing. And feminists, who are part of a group who have also been exploited and oppressed, are following the same logic, telling Muslim women, who have reclaimed the hijab as a personal choice rather than something imposed upon them as pride in their culture, to remove that? Side note, in racial discussions in america it's mostly an issue of black people. I totally understand this, as in the US black people have faced and still face systemic oppression. But the discussions often leave out other races, especially asians i've noticed. You have jokes in the media where the joke is just "haha look at this asian stereotype" in the 21st century, this isn't something that i hear about as often as i do in regards to blackface or things like that. I'm not saying to ignore black issues, quite the opposite. I'm saying to talk about ALL issues of ALL races. Be proud of your culture, not ashamed of it. Be proud to be black, proud to be asian, proud to be hispanic, proud to be arab, just don't succumb to the standards imposed by the white majority

Trump and his magats apply this logic to many things, not just race. They will demonize people over and over to distract from their own shortcomings, all because they desire power and influence over us. And it's not just trump, many nations everywhere have been getting more fascist, targeting immigrants and trans people especially. When they are called out on this, all of a sudden you're a radical (flattered, but that has nothing to do with you being a disciple of hitler). They have a perpetual victim complex, like everyone else is after them. "White genocide! Christians are being persecuted! Trans people are after our kids!" This shit really pisses me off. There are real issues that YOU caused. Prices of everything are out of control, less people are able to afford to live especially with this war on Iran nobody asked for, education is going down the toilet, there's a shit ton of people on the epstein files, and wtf are you doing? Still trying to kill off trans people, deport immigrants, suppress political opponents, all to advance a culture war nobody cares about but you because it brings you more wealth. That's all they really care about, power. None of this is a surprise, obviously, but it still needs to be said. Every time minorities get mentioned on the news i get extreme anxiety. Or even just watching the news in general. I have since stopped watching the news and got my information elsewhere (which somehow led me to being more informed than many people i know irl lol)

There's one thing i hate that both of these types of racists have: hypocrisy. You can't claim to be inclusive if you exclude a different minority. You can't claim to be leftist if it only applies to your version of it. Everyone should be equal... under your way of life and worldview. It's like that one meme i sent about modern leftists who failed to unbrainwash themselves and thus fall into the same logic of evangelicals: "anything that i don't like or understand is demoni- i mean problematic and we must get rid of it". Just that moralist, angry mob mindset. I suppose the same logic applies when it comes to race if they're white. When they say "it's not about race/gender/whatever, it's about class", RUN. Historically, all of those things are damn near inseparable, you can't talk about one without the other. Yes i'm referencing mao, deal with it, but we need a cultural revolution if we want to succeed in other areas like in communism. Conversely, the right is even more hypocritical, i could write a whole book on it if i could. Many of you already know about this so i'll keep it brief but i will conclude with this: how can you claim to be both unstoppable as well as constantly under attack? You can't be both a pimp and a prostitute

Neo-libertatia is a movement which rejects strict definitions. Fed up with the state of the world with the rise of fascism and out of control capitalism, as well as a left which has lost its identity, we have decided to spark a new movement which will seek to establish something truly innovative, meant to allow for the fringes of the fringe to come together and form new ideas, the only rule is that it's not boring or right wing (sorry libs and fascists lmao). There have been philosophical roots in the ccru, egoism/ego-communism, pirate politics/copyleft, communism in general, taoism, the situationists international, foucault, active nihilism, absurdism, g/acc and xenofeminism, and many more. But the idea is not to succumb to a singular idea, but to create many, kind of a chaos magick ethos to theory in a way (see my post on theorypunk): adaptable, DIY, and ever-evolving. But oh, don't mistake this for JUST something to discuss theory, tho theory is a big part of it. Instead, think of this as the breeding grounds for something big irl. Everything has multiple stages, each bigger and more advanced than the last. This will discuss culture, art, current events, philosophy, things that may or may not apply to everyday life, it doesn't matter, the outcome will be the same: complete abolition of the pre-established dogma dominating the present day, and the liberation of all creatures, by any means necessary, and establishing a more updated, more relevant, and more interesting form of communism. Adapting and increasing awareness and intuition, like the rabbit. Misunderstood by others but having the greatest potential, like the dragon. And constantly evolving with the times to create a better future, like the butterfly. The thirteen candles are a few of the core ideas to build upon, and they are as follows:

1. Complete equality and abolition of class, hierarchy, and oppressive systems such as capitalism, the state, social norms and forced conformity, patriarchy, white supremacy/eurocentricism, etc.
2. A society where gender and sexuality are no longer enforced to any degree. That system is abolished entirely, and people will just be whatever is authentic to them without fear of external hostility. A post-gender society, so to speak.
3. Religion, specifically abrahamic religions (most forms of christianity, islam, judiasm, etc) will no longer be imposed on anyone in any context. It will no longer be an institution, it will be forced out of the government entirely, and should not be what dominates culture. Spirituality embraced, but will be unique to each person, non-hierarchal, and focus less on policing morality and more so about spiritual enlightenment and gaining a better connection to/understanding of yourself and the world. We don't need to pray to a god to survive, animals do it all the time. God is dead, as told by Nietzsche. It is crucial to keep overall society spiritually neutral and secular however, to avoid any and all forms of religious dominance.
4. Enter the next stage in human evolution, where we renounce our humanity, or at least certain parts of it, and become something greater. What that entails exactly depends on the individual, but in order for a monster to combat an oppressive angry mob, they must not desire to side with the angry mob. Humanity is not the center of anything, we are all shaped by structures around us. Thus, deconstruct all of those structures, including the idea of humanity itself. Ofc all of this also means something more akin to posthumanism/voidpunk, and all its various forms and adjacent outlooks.
5. A world where everyone has the basic right of food, shelter, education, and health, regardless of wealth or background. You should not have to be forced to work or be forced to be a slave to a piece of paper society has let control our lives just to survive. There will be no money, or at LEAST have things extremely cheap and accessible to the point where we may as well not have money lmao. If everyone's basic needs aren't met, then there is an issue. This also means the environment must flourish and be protected. Ideally it's a solarpunk thing, with the perfect blend of earth and machine, allowing for biodiversity without sacrificing technological progress, in fact strengthening it. A cyborg world so to speak. But there must be maximum effort to prevent global warming, deforestation, animal cruelty/extinction, etc.
6. Evolve into a newer form of leftism. I'd like to consider myself more post-left but acknowledge that leftism generally has most things correct. However, many of them (non-anarchist adjacent people, at least) tend to be a little outdated, specifically the various sects of Marxists. Those theories need to be updated for the modern day, as things have generally gotten more complex now. We need to get creative, we need to get experimental with it. Idolizing the past only leads to more suffering and stagnation. This is why people who ignore the flaws of the soviets or idealize past theorists/movements from 100 years ago irk me, like it's good and completely normal to take inspiration from the past especially if it has elements that worked well, but it's important to have nuance about it and not endlessly glaze, and ffs form your own ideas already. And yes, Stalin DID do something wrong. Lots of things. Let's get one thing clear, tankies, if you want to talk about how nations like that are lied about by the west and there were good things about it, i'm cool with it. But if you start defending the regimes to the point of idolizing, and all of your opinions are just based on whatever Lenin or Stalin or whoever else believed, you have no place here. Put your own spin on it, make it less authoritarian, critique the negative aspects, combine it with other things, SOMETHING! Even anarchists are stuck in the past, although they don't glaze those nations, instead they are bound to their figures and theorists. It feels like most of the left is stuck in the 19th-20th century, which irks me to no end. Don't be afraid to push the boundaries rather than only talk about old theorists and old movements or be bound to the world of academia. Form your own ideas.
7. Dispose of the current system of government worldwide. Liberalism was a failed experiment, as we see it consistently evolve into authoritarianism. Now we are once again on the threshold of a neo-fascist dystopia. What, are we just gonna vote for a democrat next year? How many times do we have to repeat the same lessons over and over again? The west HAS fallen in a way, and that's a good thing if it means evolving into the next stage.
8. Workers owning the means of production is necessary, as is the abolition of private property, copyright, etc. Something non-hierarchical and ofc non-coercive. Standard stuff, but also not being forced to work in the first place. Everyone has a right to leisure, and society should have allow for the focus of our passions. Perhaps this could mean full automation? In any case, people should have agency over their own lives, in work and everywhere else.
9. Discrimination of any kind on the basis of gender, sex, religion, race, sexuality, disability, species, nationality, class, or anything of that sort is unacceptable and WILL be dealt with. In the new world, if you are to fight for people's rights, you will fight for EVERYONE'S rights. Everything is connected by the same divine energy, after all. If you suggest someone else doesn't deserve something, that implies that you don't either. Either everyone is liberated or nobody is, your choice. No more queerphobia, no more misogyny, no more white supremacy, no more ableism, no more classism, xenophobia, or ANYTHING of that sort. The revolution isn't JUST economic, but also cultural and spiritual. Hierarchy shall be wiped out.
10. Individuality (tho not really individualism in the western liberal sense) will be protected through collectivism. You can't have one without the other.
11. Desire will be the new driving force for the world. Living authentically to your true destiny, following and indulging in your passions, as long as you're living your true desire. Key word is true desire. Take a heroin addict for example. Ask someone if they actually want the drug and they'll say no 90% of the time, yet they are still addicted to it. The addiction in this case, taking the drug, is a false desire. Focus on the true desire that resides inside. Suppression of that true desire only leads to suffering.
12. Fascism thrives on nostalgia for an imaginary past where everything was peachy. They use this to fuel hatred for the modern era. We have a distaste for the modern era as well, but they hold this sentiment for the wrong reasons. Times are seen as so negative that our generation is known for idealizing the past even if they've never really lived it. I should know, i was 100% guilty of this. Most of the time this is harmless, but clearly the right has weaponized it, and it's just not really healthy or productive anyway. We acknowledge that there is no future, but instead of trying to escape fear, we face it head on and force a change. We will CREATE the future.
13. All borders and countries will eventually mold into one. A new Pangaea, so to speak. No borders, no countries, no walls to divide us.

This will be updated whenever the time is needed, but the core will remain the same. And this won't be the only post explaining what this movement will represent, in fact i will be releasing a document soon that i will send to as many people as possible, similar to what i tried to do in the past but it never went anywhere. I needed to start fresh anyway lol. So we'll be starting that over, everyone will be allowed to participate and write down their own political and philosophical shit, as well as link their own posts in the document. I will archive all of it into one big page. Another thing to note is that this isn't really an organization, that just makes us a target. I intend for us to be less easy to take down in honor of the fallen. Think of it more akin to like antifa or an alternative subculture, where where it's a movement instead. More freedom that way, with no uniform or headquarters, no rules on what you can and can't do, just raw desire and passion to create the new world. Organizations just increase restrictions and make it harder for us to fully advance, for they're a physical object. You can capture that. A movement is different. Imagine trying to catch the air around you with your bare hands. Note that i am not against organizations in general, in fact i want the neo-libertatia idea to help create LOTS of them, but i don't see the need to force anyone into a box including an organization. We're more of a pack of wolves than a fully-fledged gang, which is fine by us. We wanna be a circus, not a church. This isn't a case against getting organized in general for the greater good, by all means do so. But people are best drawn together when left to their own devices, i'd say