r/NurembergTwo

5,000 wild little penguins will be CAPTURED, MICROCHIPPED, and VACCINATED TWICE with an H5N2 bird-flu vaccine developed for chickens. The risks are enormous: vaccinated birds can still become infected and shed virus, allowing silent transmission while vaccine-induced immune pressure favors escape variants and antigenic drift. Influenza viruses can also reassort when different strains co-infect the same host, creating novel viral combinations. The vaccine supplier, Zoetis, has received nearly $30 million in grants from the Gates Foundation, including funding involving poultry health, veterinary medicines, vaccines, and diagnostics. This is a massive, irreversible biological experiment on a wild population and needs to be stopped."

The world's biggest wildlife vaccination program begins (on penguins) | ABC NEWS

@_.revolutionary_._ on Instagram: "🚨 THE EPSTEIN FILES AREN’T JUST A STORY — THEY REPRESENT REAL VICTIMS AND YEARS OF SEXUAL ABUSE. Jeffrey Epstein was accused by federal prosecutors of running a system that sexually exploited and abused underage girls. Some victims were as young as 14. Girls were reportedly recruited under the pretext of massages, sexually abused, paid money, and in some cases encouraged or paid to recruit other girls into the same system. This wasn’t simply about one wealthy man behaving badly. Prosecutors described a network in which employees and associates helped contact victims and schedule encounters. Ghislaine Maxwell was later convicted after evidence showed that she helped recruit, groom and facilitate the sexual abuse of minors alongside Epstein. She received a 20-year prison sentence. The most disturbing part is the power surrounding the case. For years, Epstein moved through wealthy and influential circles while vulnerable girls were being exploited. That raises a question that still matters: WHO KNEW WHAT — AND WHEN? Being named, photographed with, or appearing in documents connected to Epstein is NOT by itself proof that someone committed a crime. Every individual allegation needs evidence and due process. But the victims deserve to be heard, the documented crimes deserve to be remembered, and legitimate questions about powerful people should be investigated rather than buried. The U.S. Department of Justice now maintains an Epstein Library containing released court and government materials, including documents involving the Maxwell case. This isn’t about protecting Democrats, Republicans, billionaires, celebrities, politicians or anyone else. If someone committed a crime, investigate them. If the evidence proves it, prosecute them. No amount of money, fame or political power should put anyone above the law. Most importantly, remember the victims

"In 1949, an Australian psychiatrist named John Cade published a paper showing that lithium could treat bipolar disorder. He took it further; if high lithium treats it, maybe a deficiency in childhood causes it. And if that’s true, lithium must be an essential trace element. That same year, the FDA banned lithium as a supplement. The same year. So, what were they trying to conceal? Lithium is the natural inhibitor of GSK3 — an enzyme that, when left unchecked, drives chronic inflammation. Chronic inflammation is the engine behind virtually every chronic disease we know of. Alzheimer’s, heart disease, autoimmune conditions, cancer, bipolar disorder - all of these have chronic inflammation at their core. Lithium also triggers autophagy, the body’s built-in process for identifying and destroying pathogens, including viruses. No lithium, no autophagy. No autophagy, no real immune response. Just a cytokine storm and a prescription. So, it stands to reason that if you strip lithium from the water and the soil and make sure nobody’s talking about it, GSK3 will run wild. The result? Everybody gets sick. And somebody profits. One researcher puts it plainly: 90% of the pharmaceutical market depends on lithium deficiency. Dr Nehls’ book is called “The Conspiracy Against Lithium.” “Are you saying that was done on purpose?” “Absolutely. That’s why it’s called a conspiracy.” Watch this discussion with Dr. Michael Nehls and see episode 464 at TheHighWire.com

FreeNZ on Instagram: "New Zealand whistleblower Barry Young describes how the Crown continues to refuse to show the Court the vaccine database evidence. The judge ordered the data to be produced, yet while the Crown gave the spreadsheet to their own expert witness (Professor Robert Scragg of Auckland University - the same expert who claimed the vaccine was so safe he didn’t even need to look at it), they refused to provide it to the court. When challenged on proper procedure, they initially agreed, then backtracked weeks later claiming it was “too hard,” and are now actively refusing to show the evidence to the judge. Barry suggests that the only logical reason is that they are terrified of what the data actually shows. Clip Transcript: "It's like a crucifix to a vampire. They cannot look at it because they're just terrified of it. And that's been apparent throughout, even with this latest hearing. The judge said, to the court, to his credit, said, "I want to see the data." They [The Crown] gave the spreadsheet to their professor, their expert witness, they gave the data to him. The one who said, "It's such a safe vaccine... that I don't need to look at it." Yep... Professor [Robert] Scragg, Auckland University. And the judge said, as a matter of procedure, if you show the evidence to the expert, the court expects to see it as well. That's process 101. And the Crown said, "Oh, yes, if it would benefit the court, we will produce the data. We will give it to the court." However, they backtracked a couple of weeks later on that statement, which they made at the voir dire. They backtracked on it and said, "We've had a look and it's too hard. So we're not going to give the court that evidence, that data. So we're not going to show it to them." They just denied it. And so it goes round and round, but they are absolutely refusing to look at it. They are refusing to show it to the judge. And the reason why they're refusing to look at it is clearly because they're terrified of it.""