r/neurallace

Do you experience epistemic loneliness?
▲ 80 r/neurallace+23 crossposts

Do you experience epistemic loneliness?

According to some of the posts I've seen here, I think this is a thing. In case you haven't heard of the term:

Epistemic loneliness is a distinct cognitive form of isolation that occurs when you are profoundly unable to share, explore, or mutually develop complex ideas with others, even when you possess the requisite communication skills.

I've experienced this and also know people who have.

Maybe social difficulties are more of an environment thing rather than a personality trait, day by day I lean more into the environment hypothesis.

Sure some people could use a boost in their social awareness or confidence, but it takes time especially if you're stuck in an evironment that feels unstimulating or draining, or if you feel alone in how you see the world.

Also of course, people waste a lot of time in small talk missing opportunities for connection based on the things that make life a strange and precious adventure.

Following the environment hypothesis I think this demands an architectural solution rather than addressing the problem psychologically or individually.

So I came up with an architecture for good conversations based on interests (you'd say this is very intj?).

The strucrtural answer I reached is Pollen. People's topics of interest are taken, then, a question that connects them is posed to start a temporary group conversation.

So what do you think, through your life have there been environments that made you feel comfortable, like people cared to get into topics that were interesting to you and moved away from small talk?

What made them work? What was missing?

u/drunksocks — 1 day ago
▲ 62 r/neurallace+3 crossposts

Neurotech in Switzerland Market Map

Market map and taxonomy

The complete working map contains 51 names: 28 core Swiss neurotechnology companies, 19 adjacent companies and 4 borderline names.

The count is deliberately broader than just BCIs or neuromodulation. Core means direct neural recording, interpretation, stimulation, modulation, repair, restoration or specialist neurological measurement. Adjacent covers rehabilitation robotics, surgical technology, movement sensing and other businesses close enough to the nervous system that leaving them out would give a pretty incomplete picture. Borderline is exactly what it sounds like: companies I think are relevant to the market, but where the technology, use case or Swiss footprint sits just outside the tighter definition.

A couple of important caveats. Aleva Neurotherapeutics remains on the map because it is part of the Swiss neurotech story and got a directional DBS system all the way through CE marking and into the market, but the Lausanne court approved a composition agreement with its unsecured creditors in June 2024. Dandelion Science has a meaningful Geneva connection but a US-Swiss footprint rather than a clean Swiss headquarters story.

The map uses representative city clusters rather than trying to pin all fifty-one companies individually. The full taxonomy is below.

Core neurotech companies (28)
3Brain
ABILITY Neurotech
Aleva Neurotherapeutics
BEE Medic
Bottneuro
Braincredible
BrainQuant
BrainScape Medical
Comphya
dEEGtal
DeepPsy
FinalSpark
HBImed
IDUN Technologies
Infera Neuro
Luciole Medical
machineMD
MaxWell Biosystems
MindMaze
MYNERVA
NeuroGyn
Neurosoft Bioelectronics
Optohive
Positrigo
SaisiR
SensArs
Skaaltec
Xana, Smart Neurostimulation

Adjacent neurotech companies (19)
Altoida
Artiria Medical
Bearmind
Clee Medical
Dividat
Emovo Care
Gondola Medical Technologies
Hocoma
Intento
Lambda Health System
Magnes
MindMetrix
MYOLINK
Nanoflex Robotics
neurodAIgnostics
Reha Technology
Rhovica Neuroimaging
SurgeonsLab
TWIICE

Borderline (4)
Bewe, formerly Neuria
BRNLIT.AI
Connectome Health
Dandelion Science

Of the twenty-eight core names, five are enabling suppliers rather than clinical products, eight haven’t reached a person yet, fourteen have technology in humans in some form and six have products in clinical use. DeepPsy is already reimbursed through Swiss basic health insurance.

There is also a fairly obvious geographic pattern once everything is on one sheet. Geneva repeatedly leads back to Campus Biotech, the Wyss Center and HUG. Lausanne leads back to EPFL and CHUV. Zurich leads back to ETH. Bern and Basel add smaller specialist groups around diagnostics, surgery and stimulation.
You can get from Geneva to Zurich by train in less than three hours. In the US these would probably be separate ecosystems. In Switzerland they’re stops on the same train.

The full article goes into the companies, who is actually in humans, the Swiss investor landscape and why the country seems unusually good at getting difficult neuroscience through the awkward bit between a paper and a patient.

https://theneurotechnewsletter.substack.com/p/neurotech-in-switzerland

As always, corrections and companies I’ve missed are very welcome.

u/NeurotechNewsletter — 5 days ago