Since candace's episode, monsterlab political campaigns have been suspended. TP USA is dodgy and dangerous AF.
If they are state funded, the state running them needs to get better assets.
I recently posted looking for purchasing advice.
I ended up with WiiM amp, q acoustics q3020i, and I revived an active klipsch subwoofer with a dead amp and turned it passive using a Fosi amp.
I just want to thank the sub because I would have purchased inferior gear at a much higher cost without this sub.
I was initially quoted at an audio store AUD $3,000+ for a PSB setup with sub. I got this all for ~AUD $1,000.
I don't generally worry abt theoretical possibilities. However, Labor may get desperate, and these (hate group) laws don't have any real checks and balances.
Labor has already started the ground work for banning by labelling one nation as far right and purveyors of continual lying, misinformation, etc, etc.
*i'm not even a fan of one nation nor labor or liberals (such is the sad state of Australia's current cultural and political climate).
As soon as charlie was dead, we had two things occur to divide the population and to try to get nobody to be interested in looking anywhere else than tyler.
I think it was a social media strategy - maybe seeded by an interested party to align the left and right from NOT looking into this issue with any level of critical thinking.
What they wanted was ppl of the right to think "obviously guilty because he was a weird and weirdos like this just kill." This locks in that cohort with guilty as hell.
They split the population into these two camps of "tyler is definitely guilty" or don't care at all because he deserved to die. The effect is the same... don't think abt this too much ppl.
I have often thought it was weird that anybody would pay off an old guy to act as a "distraction". I couldn't make this square with a theory of somebody that was setup as a patsy.
Which then made me think of cognitive framing on the day:
Two things happened as potential framing to help massage the minds of the crowd and the media.
First: The question asked by the person (which was chosen by TPUSA) when charlie was killed was about trans and killing
---This is how they framed Lance and Tyler soon after
Second: The old man calling out... I shot Charlie
---This framed the sound and context of the situation as a shooting (aside from maybe an explosion)
I wonder if both of these framing devices where used to limit and control the perception of everyone watching.
*Allegedly*
Lance appears to be lying in his testimony in court.
1). He states that he hadn't had contact with Tyler until 11pm except the screenshots shows him sending a text to Tyler at 4ish and receiving a text at 4ish.
2). He states he wasn't following the story at all (except maybe an instagram post)... except in the text stream, he shows that he knows about the guy who called out he was the shooter
3). He seems to agree to looking up news stories for tyler in the text stream / screenshots.
My conjecture:
His explanation of not following the story is not logical. YOU WOULD ABSOLUTELY look up a story where your partner tells you that they just killed someone. Especially, when this killer is coming back to your apartment!
He seems to agree initially to deleting the text messages (and the ones we see may have been undeleted) which would be initial destruction of evidence.
If he can't be trusted on point 1, 2, and 3, there is no good reason to trust his whole story.
I know a lot has been said and allegedly proved on X about height of Tyler vs "Tyler".
I am not commenting on that.
However, I do want to note that scrubbing through the video frame by frame that the hair looks similar between the maroon "tyler" and black clothed "tyler".
Also, the heights are similar between the "Tylers".
For me the question still is...
Does "Tyler" = Tyler Robinson
Is he the only one involved? Was he the fall guy? Was he a patsy? Did someone else set this in motion?
Did a bullet from a rooftop actually kill Charlie?
Okay, obviously, "Tyler" is wearing different outfits on the day. The shoes seem consistent between the different outfits. However, the caps are not.
When "Tyler" is in a maroon shirt - he is wearing a black hurley cap but when he is in jeans he is wearing a blue cap with a smaller light colored logo.
If you watch the videos, it is obvious that these are definitely different colored caps.
Two caps and two different backpacks but kept the same shoes?
This by itself doesn't mean a lot but it is interesting nonetheless.
