Here is a hypothesis LHVIF :A "Vortex Integrity" Thought experiment for Black Hole
​
Hi everyone,
I'm a 14-year-old with a big imagination and no formal physics training beyond basic school stuff. I’ve been thinking about the black hole information paradox, but instead of math, I use a water vortex analogy. It’s probably nonsense, but I wanted to share it anyway. I call it the Large Hole Vortex Integrity Factor (LHVIF) .
My Analogy:
· A black hole is like a water vortex (whirlpool).
· Infalling matter/information is like an object being sucked in.
· Strong tidal forces = fast, violent vortex (small black hole) → information gets shredded.
· Weak tidal forces = large, slow vortex (supermassive black hole) → information stays more intact.
So the ability to "reverse the vortex" and recover intact information depends on the black hole's size and spin.
My "Formula" (for fun, not real physics):
To avoid 0% or 100% (nothing is perfect), I made this:
\text{LHVIF} = \frac{Q}{1+Q}, \quad Q = \left(\frac{M}{M_0}\right)^2 (1-a^2)
· M = black hole mass.
· a = dimensionless spin (0 to 1).
· M_0 = a reference mass (I picked ~1 million solar masses, just a guess).
What it says:
· Very small or fast-spinning black hole → LHVIF → 0% (information practically lost).
· Very large and slow-spinning black hole → LHVIF → 100% (information practically recoverable).
· Never exactly 0 or 100% – always a tiny residue of chaos.
A "Test" with Sgr A (our galaxy's supermassive black hole):*
· Mass ~4.3 million Suns.
· Spin a \approx 0.9 (very fast!).
· Using my silly formula, LHVIF comes out around something like 50–80% depending on M_0 . Not perfect, but not hopeless.
My Question for You (Physics People):
Does this kind of "intuitive vortex thinking" have any connection to real physics concepts (like the holographic principle, ER=EPR, or the role of tidal forces in information scrambling)? Or is it just a cute but useless analogy?
I know I'm just a kid, and this is not rigorous. But I enjoy thinking this way. Thank you for reading, and feel free to tell me why it's wrong (but please be gentle 😅).
(posted anonymously)