What makes you confident that a problem is actually worth solving?
I’ve noticed that finding a problem isn’t usually the difficult part.
The difficult part is figuring out whether the problem is painful enough for people to actually care about solving it.
Founders can look at:
- Customer requests
- User interviews
- Product usage data
- Reddit/community discussions
- Competitor gaps
- Search trends
- Their own assumptions
But these signals can sometimes point in completely different directions.
So I’m curious how other founders approach this:
What’s the strongest signal that makes you confident a problem is worth building a product or feature around?
And have you ever built something because you thought there was demand, only to realize later that the signal was misleading?
Would be interested to hear what has actually worked for you.