How were the leaders and key figures of the Fourth Crusade viewed and treated in contemporary society after the crusade and its subsequent controversies(e.g. excommunication by the Pope, sacking of Constantinople)?
I currently am under the impression that the Fourth Crusade and its actions were hotly disputed among the crusaders and those outside the crusade. I have read about some crusading groups that refused to participate in actions, and Pope Innocent III excommunicated crusaders by Pope Innocent III.
Further, it seems much of the descriptions of the events of the Fourth Crusade are filled with a sense of lasting animosity and regret(especially in the Western/Christian World) with contemporary Catholic/Latin and Byzantine authors writing about the horrors of the sack of Constantinople, historians describing the Fourth Crusade in terms such as "There was never a greater crime against humanity than the Fourth Crusade"(Sir Steven Runciman, Taken from the Wikipedia on the Crusdade), and apologies hundreds of years latter by heads of the Catholic Church to the Eastern Orthodox.
Now, with how much of a seeming catastrophe this crusade was on the World of Christendom, and how again it seemed many folks of the time perceived the immorality/wrongness of said crusade, how did the societies of the Christian world, crusaders themselves, and other notable figures look upon the leaders and participants of the Crusades while they were alive or in short memory?
For example, Enrico Dandolo hid the fact that the crusaders were excommunicated after the Siege of Zara from the crusaders. Did the crusaders feel tricked learning about this? Did the people of Venice, his son, and family see him as deceitful/treacherous/depraved/etc. Did his name become a family stain?
Another example, when people heard of the looting of Constantinople and even its churches, did they have uproar of again looking at their fellow countrymen with disdain, the same way some in modern society might react to learning a veteran committed a brutal warcrime lets say.
These are just some examples of the type of views/attitude I am asking about, but they can truly encompass any answer involving the contemporary or close to contemporary attitudes/treatment toward and experienced by the crusaders and the leaders.