Is the DI section on the real GMAT really that unpredictable?
I've been browsing GMAT forums for a while, and I've started wondering if there's a bit of selection bias going on. It seems like people who have a bad test experience are naturally more motivated to post about it, seek advice, and discuss what went wrong, while those whose exams go smoothly are less likely to share.
That said, I've noticed a growing number of recent test-takers describing the Data Insights (DI) section as the biggest wildcard on the exam. Many say it felt significantly different from what they practised (lengthy, complex, and whatnot) or that it ended up being their toughest section.
For those who've taken the GMAT recently—or tutors and mentors who've worked with recent test-takers—how accurate is this perception? Is the "DI disaster" narrative being exaggerated because of reporting bias, or have you genuinely seen DI become more unpredictable or challenging on the actual exam?
I'd really appreciate hearing your experiences and insights. Thanks in advance!