View of Occupational Therapists?
Hello, Noctor community!
I'm an occupational therapist working in pediatrics these days, although I've also worked in neuro rehab primarily with patients recovering from CVAs. I've found my career immensely rewarding, and I have tremendous respect for the physicians I've worked alongside.
Many people in my family are physicians, so I've also had considerable exposure to the medical profession outside my own experience. I've seen firsthand how valuable physician advocacy can be, particularly when insurance companies deny or restrict access to rehabilitation services. I've collaborated with physicians to challenge those decisions and help patients obtain necessary care.
I'm curious how this community views OTs and our role within the healthcare system? I have an OTD because I received a scholarship that covered it, however I don't think this should be a required entry level degree for our field. A masters level education for PT and OT is plenty imho. No PT or OT I have ever known has masqueraded themselves as "doctor". I think we would all laugh at anyone who did this as soon as they turn their back.
I've also been thinking about the expanding independent NP practice. If I were an NP, I would personally prefer to work under direct physician supervision, particularly given the differences in clinical training. I'm not entirely sure why an NP would want to practice independently without that oversight. There is no way an NP can make up for the lack of residency and training that doctors have. Why would any NP even want independent practice?
Their training should include substantially more rigorous clinical preparation, ideally something approaching the structure and intensity of physician residency training. I also believe NP licensure should require physician supervision rather than permit independent practice.
I'm interested in hearing your perspectives, both on occupational therapy and on the broader question of appropriate clinical supervision and scope of practice. Thank you!