u/Advanced-Leading744

You are not your result. You are you.

Hi. Firstly, sorry for the badly-timed joke post about the tax question and the alpacas. In my head it was hilarious but clearly tone-deaf to the April/May sitters so my bad.

Second, results tomorrow. I am getting them too. I am a career convert - used to be a shrink and mental health stuff. I worked a lot on something called self-efficacy (not to be confused with self-esteem, different TED talk).

Self-efficacy is the difference between:

>"Oh, I made a mistake, I failed, I am terrible and do not deserve anything"

and

>"Oh, I made a mistake, there is something I can do different next time and try again."

It is an intrinsic sense of worth that recognises the difference between who you are, and what you do.

They are not the same. Even in our everyday language we may say something like "I am proud of you" after having done something, and we mistake the praise and worth with the recognition and validation of the achievement. I think that is very unfortunate, and becomes a real cross by the time we come to sit pivotal exams.

To the ~80% of people who pass tomorrow, congratulations,!, but what will hold you in a higher place for much longer is not thinking "oh, I passed, I am great" but "oh, I passed, I executed that job well, and what I did well I will try to take forward into X, Y, Z, etc." especially if you have a job role or TC lined up. It will grant you far more resilience when you find out that a 9-7, five to six days a week is actually not about writing a letter to a client having only known them for half an hour and hoping it is the right advice for the invisible markers.

It is the ability to dust yourself down when you eventually fall. Because you will fall. There is much more "you" in the getting up than there is in the falling, and it will happen eventually in work life and in general.

So, well done, but keep going, and do not mistake even a good result for your worth. You are more than that.

For anyone who is unsuccessful tomorrow. This post may not mean a terrible amount tomorrow afternoon, or the day afterwards, or ever. But the same rings true, and even more so:

You are not your result. You are you.

Life is bigger than an exam, law, a career. You have people around you who do not like you for how well you smashed those mocks or "hung on in there" during the exams, but for the entire you. For a while you will look at the black speck on the whiteboard and forget the entire canvas, but when you are able to look at this post again (or much more ideally, yourself), dust yourself down and remember it was a result of something you didn't do in a small area of your life, and not a deficit in the whole of who you are.

Just thought that might be a nice thing to hear on either side of results tomorrow. Good luck to everyone and hopefully we will not have to try and bleed a stone dry again in an interviewing station.

reddit.com
u/Advanced-Leading744 — 2 days ago

Hi guys I was just wondering if any of you had the same situation happen to me this week during my advocacy (crim lit) station?

I cannot say what when where why who how or what planet I did this on because of #NDA but in general I had a good plan coming out of my criminal advocacy prep (knew the test, had the facts, structured well) and went in to this sage gentleman in a little green bow tie who was already looking at his crib sheet looking perplexed and scratching his head.

I had a slight moment of “is this the right room” but he appeared to acknowledge me finally and I stood in front of him. So I tried to recompose myself and began with my most confident three words of the session “Good morning, Judge.”

“Can I just stop you there please.”

… what

In no universe or paradigm was I expecting that response. An interruption?? what happened to my 10 minutes or so of rushed garbled law?

“Just- could you have a quick look at this. Now, if I transfer my Cotswolds alpaca farm into a Panamanian discretionary trust, does it still qualify for Agricultural Property Relief against Inheritance Tax, or will HMRC view the alpacas as a taxable benefit in kind?”

Wh-

“I have a calculator here and the figures.”

No, please n-

“Could you just calculate the exact Capital Gains liability on the fleeces, assuming they are wasting chattels, applying the March 1982 rebasing rules, and converting the final sum into Panamanian Balboas?”

Every functioning organ in me died there and then (besides my sweat glands, which were now on a cocktail of steroids and cocaine). The husk of a body I was operating shook as I took his CASIO fx-85GTCW (not exam compliant btw) and proceeded to quickly and conveniently develop both dyscalculia and an inability to write as I pretended to recall any tax figures or even what an alpaca was.

Five hou- sorry, minutes, passed, and the rough paper was now beginning to look like something Picasso would be proud of, when the judge said:

“Oh, sorry, those are the old figures.”

WHA-

He shifted his bottom gently and procured a creased, slightly damp stack of off-white papers in italic monospace.

“Just a quick crunch. Thanks.”

Using the old papers to wipe away all the bodily secretions on my face, I hyperventilated through the impossible impromptu tax question that I was PROMISED WOULD NOT APPEAR IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM WHAT THE HELL r/SQE_PREP

The knock came. It wasn’t a dream. THAT was my criminal advocacy session.

“Thanks m'boy.”

I can’t remember much after seeing the St John’s Ambulance blaring for me after that session.

Anyway I’m currently sitting in A&E waiting for discharge with a diagnosis of ‘acute alpaca-induced trauma’ and a mild heart arrhythmia

My question is: does anyone know if the SRA accepts mitigating circumstances for accidentally aiding and abetting a simulated judge in international offshore tax evasion? Or is that just an automatic fail under the Statement of Solicitor Competence?

I have Property Practice tomorrow morning and I also need to know if I should be brushing up on Panamanian extradition treaties or if I should just throw myself into the Thames right now?

TL;DR: My criminal advocacy examiner used me for free tax advice regarding South American livestock. Please, please tell me someone else had the alpaca guy???

reddit.com
u/Advanced-Leading744 — 22 days ago