u/Aggressive-Leave-890

I've been kicking around an idea and wanted to get some honest feedback.

The concept(Metty AI): a platform where you just say who you need to talk to, and it connects you to a verified expert within minutes. No posting a job, no sifting through proposals, no chasing replies.

You'd describe your need — say a tax advisor, a video editor, a compliance lawyer, a designer — and AI matches you with a verified provider near you almost immediately. Then you just have a conversation. That's it.

It would cover a bunch of categories: tech, finance, design, marketing, investment, law, compliance, video editing, content creators, and so on.

The whole point is killing the friction. Right now, going from "I have a need" to "I'm talking to the right expert" usually means job boards, waiting around, comparing bids, ghosted messages. I want that gap to basically disappear.

A few things I'm genuinely unsure about and would love input on:

• Would you actually trust an instant match over picking someone yourself?
• How much does "verified" need to mean before you'd use it?
• Is "near you" important for most of these categories, or does it only matter for some?

I've been kicking around an idea and wanted to get some honest feedback.

The concept(Metty AI): a platform where you just say who you need to talk to, and it connects you to a verified expert within minutes. No posting a job, no sifting through proposals, no chasing replies.

You'd describe your need — say a tax advisor, a video editor, a compliance lawyer, a designer — and AI matches you with a verified provider near you almost immediately. Then you just have a conversation. That's it.

It would cover a bunch of categories: tech, finance, design, marketing, investment, law, compliance, video editing, content creators, and so on.

The whole point is killing the friction. Right now, going from "I have a need" to "I'm talking to the right expert" usually means job boards, waiting around, comparing bids, ghosted messages. I want that gap to basically disappear.

A few things I'm genuinely unsure about and would love input on:

• Would you actually trust an instant match over picking someone yourself?
• How much does "verified" need to mean before you'd use it?
• Is "near you" important for most of these categories, or does it only matter for some?

I've been kicking around an idea and wanted to get some honest feedback.

The concept(Metty AI): a platform where you just say who you need to talk to, and it connects you to a verified expert within minutes. No posting a job, no sifting through proposals, no chasing replies.

You'd describe your need — say a tax advisor, a video editor, a compliance lawyer, a designer — and AI matches you with a verified provider near you almost immediately. Then you just have a conversation. That's it.

It would cover a bunch of categories: tech, finance, design, marketing, investment, law, compliance, video editing, content creators, and so on.

The whole point is killing the friction. Right now, going from "I have a need" to "I'm talking to the right expert" usually means job boards, waiting around, comparing bids, ghosted messages. I want that gap to basically disappear.

A few things I'm genuinely unsure about and would love input on:

• Would you actually trust an instant match over picking someone yourself?
• How much does "verified" need to mean before you'd use it?
• Is "near you" important for most of these categories, or does it only matter for some?

I've been kicking around an idea and wanted to get some honest feedback.

The concept(Metty AI): a platform where you just say who you need to talk to, and it connects you to a verified expert within minutes. No posting a job, no sifting through proposals, no chasing replies.

You'd describe your need — say a tax advisor, a video editor, a compliance lawyer, a designer — and AI matches you with a verified provider near you almost immediately. Then you just have a conversation. That's it.

It would cover a bunch of categories: tech, finance, design, marketing, investment, law, compliance, video editing, content creators, and so on.

The whole point is killing the friction. Right now, going from "I have a need" to "I'm talking to the right expert" usually means job boards, waiting around, comparing bids, ghosted messages. I want that gap to basically disappear.

A few things I'm genuinely unsure about and would love input on:

• Would you actually trust an instant match over picking someone yourself?
• How much does "verified" need to mean before you'd use it?
• Is "near you" important for most of these categories, or does it only matter for some?

Every marketing tool I've used follows the same pattern: connect 10 platforms, get a dashboard, get a list of "recommendations," then I'm the one who has to log into Meta, write the post, open the PR, fire the conversion event, etc.

So I built the opposite(aicopilot.marketing). It's a multi-agent system that connects to your stack (Meta, Google Ads, GA4, Search Console, Shopify, Stripe, LinkedIn, TikTok, Klaviyo, GitHub — ~70 platforms total) and an orchestrator agent delegates to specialists who actually execute:

• Ads — drafts campaign briefs from your real numbers, pauses fatigued creative when CTR halves, dispatches to Meta/Google/LinkedIn/TikTok
• SEO — audits Core Web Vitals + structured data, ranks the 3–5 highest-leverage fixes, and opens an actual PR against your repo via GitHub OAuth
• Social — per-platform drafts trained on your past posts and voice samples, lands in a drafts inbox
• Analyst — joins ad spend ↔ sessions ↔ conversions ↔ rage clicks and names the exact campaign that broke the funnel
• Anomalies — watches CPA/CTR/funnel KPIs hourly, tells you why something moved, and offers to ship the fix

Two design choices I think matter more than the feature list:

1. Every number is cited. No hallucinated stats — if it claims signups dropped 31%, it links to the tool call that produced that number. You can verify in two clicks. The system prompt literally forbids inventing a number without a tool call backing it, and we eval against that.
2. Read-only by default. OAuth read scopes only until you explicitly flip writes on per platform. Tokens encrypted at rest with AES-256-GCM, per-action audit log. I don't want write access to your ad account day one — neither should anyone else.

The thing that surprised me most building this: the SEO agent shipping a PR to fix a /pricing button (47 rage clicks logged that week) felt qualitatively different from getting a Slack alert about the same thing. Closing the loop matters more than I expected — every "insight tool" stops one step short of the action, and that step is where 90% of the value lives.

Happy to dig into the architecture in comments — orchestrator/specialist agent split, how we force tool use for citations, the connector readiness layer that handles 70 different OAuth flows, anything. Roast the idea too if you've tried something similar and it didn't work.

Hey,

Quick share for fellow founders / professionals. I'm building Metty— an AI agent that connects founders, executives, and individuals to the right CAs, lawyers, marketers, developers, or other professionals in real-time. Free for the person seeking help; providers pay subscription for AI-matched, qualified leads.

What's live in 10 days: – 200+ providers across 8 categories – 5 cities – First paid subscription closed today – Voice AI you can talk to, plain English in

One important request: please don't test it unless you actually need a professional service. Real providers get notified in real-time, and treating it as a toy makes them think the leads are spam. So please: only call/WhatsApp if you have a real need.

If you're a CA, lawyer, marketer, developer, or other professional — happy to onboard you on the supply side.

Comment your category and city and I'll DM you.

Open to all feedback — what would you want this to do better?
What categories are missing?