
This is NOT a bad beat story.
Over a two year time-period, I played 250,000+ hands combined of Zynga Poker and Global Poker. I screen-recorded approximately 100 hours of unedited gameplay, from multiple sessions. Some as short as an hour. Some upwards of eight hours consecutive play.
Last year, this led me to file a federal lawsuit against Zynga Poker for fraudulent misrepresentation. Every claim in that filing was made under oath and under penalty of perjury. The case has since been compelled to arbitration, a process I'm pursuing and respect fully. But while the dispute will be private, the conversation can’t be.
I have been talking to journalists for months. But what the poker community thinks about this story matters a great deal to me and I’m interested to hear your thoughts.
I'm not asking you to take my word for any of this, I'm simply sharing what the data showed me, and asking whether other experiences match mine. All claims are based on my playing experience, research, and correspondence with Zynga and VGW (Global Poker).
Let me address a couple of things first.
"Everyone knows social poker isn't real poker."
Not everyone. And that’s the problem. Zynga boasts 236 million registered players since 2007. For a huge portion of the poker-playing public, this is their poker. How they experience the game matters. And how these games shape people’s impression of online poker also matters.
"Rigged posts are just noise."
Hand-scripting is part of the story, but it often detracts from the real story:
After the online poker scandals of the 2000s, real-money platforms faced strict regulation; hand histories, robust RNG certification, player authentication. So-called "social" or "free-to-play" games were never subject to those same requirements.
And that loophole is the real story.
I've only studied two social/free-to-play games in depth; Zynga Poker and Global Poker. But they both uncannily show the same patterns. Albeit Zynga seems to do so in a more sophisticated way than Global Poker.
I don’t think this is just about two bad actors, but the entire social gaming industry. The story stays largely invisible because the games are misleadingly dismissed as "free-to-play,” when chip packages can cost thousands of dollars on these sites.
My four main claims:
- Board manipulation "Free-to-play" platforms seem to be able to legally use board-altering algorithms that would never pass scrutiny in a regulated real-money environment, while marketing themselves as fair and random poker games.
- RNG misrepresentation They reference RNG certification, but the scope of what is actually being certified isn’t clearly disclosed. In practice, this certification typically applies to the randomness of the shuffle itself, not to the broader gameplay environment players actually experience. Zynga’s full certificate is not publicly available. When I requested it, I was provided only a brief reference in a court filing, rather than the underlying documentation.
- Asymmetric opponents They present themselves as human-to-human social games while populating tables with bots, agents, or other entities with asymmetric information. e.g., knowledge of hole cards and community cards. Zynga's own terms and conditions reference "auto-generated players." No further definition is provided.
- Engagement engineering In my experience, these are not poorly-made, or tilted, poker games that simply don’t have to be as rigorous as ‘for-money’ sites. On the contrary. It seems these companies have built highly sophisticated systems, designed to extract as much money from players as possible. All while presenting themselves as harmless, fun and free games.
Two testable observations
These are the ones I keep coming back to.
1. Board texture.
I stopped tracking who won the hands and started tracking how boards developed.
Over long sessions, an unusually high proportion of hands: connected with multiple players escalated street by street, and encouraged continued betting. Not as a statistical cluster, as a consistent baseline.
I calculated action flops occurring at a rate of over 90% during my 200,000 Zynga hands. The expected rate in a fair game is roughly 20–25%.
That gap can not be explained by variance.
2. Table behavior responding to me, not to the game.
I ran a simple test. Play normally for a few rounds. Then switch to 100% passive check/fold every hand, no matter what.
Every time I did this:
- The table slowed down
- Other players stopped betting into each other
- Heavy action resumed the moment I started playing again
In a real game with real players, my check/folding should have no effect on how other players interact. There is no mechanism by which it should. Yet it happened consistently, across multiple sessions.
Both of these observations are, in principle, still testable right now on their live product, unless they've made significant changes in recent months.
What Zynga has said vs. what their own filings show
Through their lawyers, Zynga has stated:
- They don’t manipulate hands
- They have no incentive to manipulate hands
- All players are real human customers (Global Poker says this too)
At the same time:
- Zynga holds patents describing systems that adjust gameplay for engagement and identify when a player is likely to make a payment. https://patents.justia.com/assignee/zynga-inc
- Zynga's terms and conditions describe "auto-generated players" without clarifying how these differ from bots.
- Zynga's RNG certificate has not been made available in full. Only this. https://access.gaminglabs.com/certificate/index?i=335.
- Global Poker admits they use a Mersenne Twister, but provides no further detail. https://itechlabs.com/certificates/vgw/RNG_Certificate_MT_VGW_22Apr21.pdf
Why I'm posting this
If I'm right, this needs to be discussed publicly. Because the companies behind these games won't engage in the conversation.
Upon their request, I shared long-form recordings directly with Zynga. 15 months later, they still haven't commented on the video evidence and have declined my offer to walk them through the footage.
Global Poker has refused to look at the screen recordings I sent them, or discuss the allegations further.
So here I am. I’m happy to answer questions and provide more detail where I can.
___________________________________________________________________
tl;dr Two years. 250,000+ hands. 100 hours of footage. One federal lawsuit. The "free-to-play" regulatory loophole lets social poker platforms do things that would be illegal in any real-money game. And the patterns point to Zynga and Global Poker doing all of them. Does your experience match mine?