u/Any-Commercial845

The reason I’m writing a Part Two is simple.
People keep pretending this conversation is harmless. It’s not. What happened in that group chat wasn’t “just a difference of opinion.” It was people talking about queer lives like we’re theoretical, like we’re problems to solve, like our existence is something they get to vote on. And the worst part? They say it with a smile. They call it “love.” They call it “truth.” They call it “their beliefs.” But if your beliefs require someone else to shrink, to suffer, to disappear — then the problem isn’t the person you’re talking about.
The problem is your beliefs. And I’m done pretending otherwise. Because the truth is, a lot of people hide behind religion to avoid admitting the real issue: they don’t want to confront the harm they cause. They don’t want to admit that their “convictions” have consequences. They don’t want to face the reality that queer people hear every word they say and feel every cut. So let me be clear, If your theology demands someone else’s silence, it’s not holy.
If your doctrine requires someone else’s pain, it’s not righteous. If your “love” feels like fear to the person receiving it, it’s not love. I’m not writing this to be polite. I’m writing it because I’m tired of watching people weaponize faith and then act shocked when someone finally calls it what it is.

Spot the imposter

Part Two of Human Rights

Human Rights Based Off Facts: Christian Views Compared to Facts

Human Rights Based Off Facts: Christian Views Compared to Facts