Are the exam questions really meant to "trick" you?
I've been looking over the questions I'm getting wrong on mock exams, and there were a few on BAS and Understand bx specifically that I couldn't understand why I got wrong, even with their reasoning. I ran a few of those questions through Chat gpt to see which answer it would choose, and chat gpt was selecting the same answers that I was. Chat gpt's response to this was that I am thinking about things as they'd be done in a clinic, not how the test wants me to answer. It also seems like some mocks want you to infer a bit of background info, within reason, and others don't. There is definitely a method to answering these questions, but that method seems to differ by WHICH mock you're taking.
As an example, one question asked me which step of an FA would come next, given xyz scenario. I thought this was an easy question, but I got it wrong because I was supposed to infer that a records review had already taken place, though the question did not mention this. This was from a UB mock, so I don't want to write it off as a bad question.
I test in about a week, and when I study, there are a few task list items I'm weaker in, but nothing specific I'm struggling with. Its often times the wording that trips me up. I've gotten 76% on UB, 72% on BAS, and 80% on Boost. None stood out as "harder" than the others, so I am now concerned about wording and whether the BCBA exam leans straight forward or not.