u/Archaeo-Frog

My first experience with Augusta Buckner’s, a 10-year single barrel, wasn’t great. It wasn’t that the whole experience was bad – quite the contrary! – but there was an overpowering earthy flavor, which the official tasting notes called “wet soil,” that sort of torpedoed the whole experience for me.

However, I’ve heard very good things about their other offerings, and I’m still very interested in seeing how they are. This 13-year expression was an r/bourbon barrel pick; let’s try it out! (A big thanks to u/ambulocetus_ for the sample!)

From the Producer: Our bourbon is just as suited for sipping solo on the front porch as it is to celebrating together with friends and family. The folks at Augusta Distillery pour their heart and soul into our products every day. We are in business to celebrate our community and build upon the lasting legacy of Augusta. A true Kentucky bourbon, this limited release whiskey unmistakably captures your attention and rewards you from nose-to-finish. Aged 13 years in new, charred oak barrels, Buckner’s offers an understated potency with exceptional balance, commemorating the distillery’s inaugural bottling.

Barrel Number: 25-108

Proof: 141

Mash bill: Undisclosed

Age Statement: 13 Years

Price: $249.99

Appearance: A beautiful, very dark shade of amber – almost mahogany. Appears fairly viscous, although the legs on the glass aren’t quite as persistent as I expected.

Nose: First off is a big whiff of dark cherry, like super-concentrated Cherry Coke or Dr. Pepper. I’m definitely a fan so far! I also get some honey, vanilla, oak, and tobacco on the nose, although they’re farther in the background – this really is a cola-forward pour. As it continues to open up, caramel floats toward the top to join with the cherry note, making for a very nice pairing. The nose is very intense, but in a good way. Once the glass is empty, it’s still filled with dark cherries, toffee, and aged leather.

Palate: Holy HAZMAT, Batman! This is very hot, but it also has very intense flavor. The dark cherry note is a bit less dominant on the palate, with honey, vanilla, and lots of oak getting the chance to join it at center stage. As much as I like cherry cola, the result here is actually better balance on the palate than there was on the nose.

This is definitely an example of what folks are talking about when they refer to high-proof whiskies as “flavor bombs” – it has an absolute ton of concentrated flavor. The one complaint I have is that the earthiness that I experienced (and did not like) in the 10-year is insisting on showing up here as well, although thankfully it’s more muted amidst the rush of other flavors.

Finish: Hot and lengthy. As the heat subsides, though, the finish on the 13-year unfortunately becomes similar to the finish on the 10-year: bitter and dominated by the “wet soil” flavor that the official tasting notes call out, which is not at all pleasant (why, Augusta, did you have to make that such an integral part of this experience?! It had been going so well!).

Thoughts: I don’t normally go for HAZMAT whiskey, and this one was definitely hot, but I absolutely got the concentrated flavors from it that some enthusiasts like to call out as a benefit of higher proof points. Most of those flavors were really good, too – especially that strong, syrupy cherry cola note. However, I am still struggling with the “wet soil” element of these Buckner’s expressions. This one wasn’t as bad on the palate as the 10-year, but it was very strong on the finish, which unfortunately left me with a bad taste in my mouth (literally) about the whole experience. I’m not sure why no other reviews seem to call this out – I know I’m not the only one noticing it, because it’s in Augusta’s official tasting notes.

I also tried this whiskey at a slightly lower proof by adding a few drops of water to it, and the result was very interesting. The earthy note almost dosappeared, while the cherry cola and tobacco flavors popped even more than they did at full proof. Honestly, this is a slightly more enjoyable pour to me at the lower proof, not because the cacophony of flavors was reduced, but because it caused that earthiness to largely fade away. It was still there on the finish, but nowhere near as pronouncedly as it was at 141 proof.

The value question here is obviously a big one, as well. At well over $200, this almost needed to be a life-changing whiskey in order for me to be able to recommend it without any reservations. While it may be that for you, it unfortunately didn’t quite make it to that level for me (again, because of the earthy finish, not because of any other issue with the whiskey!).

However, I’ll note again here that value doesn’t have a place in my numeric rating; for that, we’re just judging what’s in the bottle on its own merits.

Rating: I’m honestly conflicted on this one. Augusta’s Buckner’s 13-Year Single Barrel was a largely enjoyable HAZMAT pour that was unfortunately undone by an overly earthy and bitter finish. Without that, it probably would have earned a very high rating (likely in the 7.5-to-8.5-point range; it really was that good). However, the finish is part of the experience, and it serves to pull this one down significantly (although not as significantly as it would have if I hadn’t tried it proofed-down a bit). I ultimately have to rate it as a 6.5 on the modified T8ke scale – squarely between “Very Good” and “Great” – but that’s such a frustrating rating to give, because so much of it truly was Excellent.

********************
Previous Ratings (updated to include decimals)

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)
Augusta Buckner’s 10yr (4.6)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.8)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5)
Stagg 25B (5.3)
Four Roses SBBP OBSV (5.3)
Evan Williams America250 SiB (5.3)
1792 BiB SiB (5.5)
Blanton’s (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.7)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.8)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Copper & Cask Boston Rum Party (6)
Copper & Cask #16 (6)
Penelope Wheated (6)
Blanton’s Gold (6.3)
Copper & Cask #14 DO (6.4)
Augusta Buckner’s 13yr (6.5)
Peerless DO (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Green River Wheated (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.6)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.8)

7 | Great | Well above average
Shortbarrel Bees Knees V (7)
Green River Honey (7)
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Peerless Toasted (7.1)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7.3)
Willett 4yr Rye (7.3)
Weller 107 (7.5)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Buffalo Trace Single Oak (7.6)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.7)
Woodford Reserve DO SBBP (7.7)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.7)
Lasso Motel SBBP Rye (7.8)
Willett 8yr Rye (7.9)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.7)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

Happy 4th of July! This limited edition Single Barrel release from Heaven Hill is part of their America250 lineup, which honors the 250th anniversary of America’s founding in 1776. It is made up of just 250 barrels, and is bottled at a significantly higher proof – 117.76º – than their standard Evan Williams offering. Let’s celebrate America by seeing just how good this is!

::pause::

Sorry, this review was delayed by the seemingly-infinite amount of time it took to open the wax and get to the bottle’s contents. They really went overboard there…

Now let’s get on with it!

From the Distillery: To celebrate America’s Semiquincentennial, we selected 250 barrels bottled at 117.76 proof in honor of this momentous occasion. Evan Williams became Kentucky’s first licensed distiller in 1783, the very year America formalized its independence with the end of the Revolutionary War. From our founding to today, we’ve stood for American craftsmanship and pride. As the nation celebrates its 250th anniversary, we raise a glass in the same enduring spirit that built this country.

Each bottle features patriotic packaging and storytelling that underscores Evan Williams’ enduring connection to America’s founding. The Single Barrel expression is hand-dipped in blue wax to match the coordinating blues in the bottle’s depiction of the Statue of Liberty.

Evan Williams Single Barrel is the only vintage dated single barrel Bourbon on the market. Similar to the way vintage wines are selected, our distillers hand-select individual barrels that meet the specifications they've established. Then each bottle is marked with the vintage date it was put into oak, along with the year it was bottled and the exact barrel number of the single barrel that the Bourbon was drawn from.

Barreled On: 12/18/2018

Bottled On: 2/24/2026

Barrel Number: 166 of 250

Age Statement: 7 Years, 1 Month

Proof: 117.76

Mashbill: 78% Corn, 10% Rye, 12% Malted Barley

Price: $39.99

Appearance: Nice dark amber; moderately oily.

Nose: After a big whiff of ethanol, I get cherry pie, red apple, and some barrel char, along with a good bit of spice, a peanutty note, and some honey.

Palate: Very spicy and somewhat astringent; seems to drink a touch above its proof. Along with spice, flavors include oak, strawberry, lots of red apple, and some orange peel, as well as caramel, honey, and cinnamon candy (think Red Hots or something similar). There’s also a slight earthiness on the rear of the palate, which is a note that I don’t tend to enjoy in any whiskey.

Finish: Primarily oaky and spicy, but not too drying. The red apple flavor lingers, combining with a light background note of caramel to provide a nice lasting flavor.

Thoughts: While the idea of this commemorative whiskey may have been slightly better than the execution, it wasn’t a bad pour by any means. In fact, for a bourbon in the $30 price range, it was pretty darn good. However, with budget options like Green River and 1792 out there, the competition even in the $30-$40 bracket is stiff, and this Evan Williams expression isn’t spectacular enough to beat all of them out. It’s still plenty enjoyable, though, and the higher proof may help this single barrel appeal to more serious consumers, while its profile is still straightforward enough to appeal to folks who are in it more for the overall flavor or for the patriotism of this release. I have no trouble recommending this to either group, as its value speaks for itself.

Rating: This Evan Williams commemorative single barrel rates a 5.3 for me on the modified T8ke scale: it’s better than “Just Fine,” but doesn’t quite rise to the level of “Very Good.” I’m happy to recommend it, but can just as easily recommend some great alternatives, even in this price range.

********************
Previous Ratings (updated to include decimals)

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)
Augusta Buckner’s 10yr (4.6)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.8)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5)
Stagg 25B (5.3)
Four Roses SBBP OBSV (5.3)
Evan Williams America250 SiB (5.3)
Weller 12 (5.4)
1792 BiB SiB (5.5)
Blanton’s (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.7)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.8)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Copper & Cask Boston Rum Party (6)
Copper & Cask #16 (6)
Penelope Wheated (6)
Blanton’s Gold (6.3)
Copper & Cask #14 DO (6.4)
Peerless DO (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Green River Wheated (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.6)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.8)

7 | Great | Well above average
Shortbarrel Bees Knees V (7)
Green River Honey (7)
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Peerless Toasted (7.1)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7.3)
Willett 4yr Rye (7.3)
Weller 107 (7.5)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.7)
Woodford Reserve DO SBBP (7.7)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.7)
Lasso Motel SBBP Rye (7.8)
Willett 8yr Rye (7.9)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.7)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

Just a quick, off-the-cuff review here. This is the third bourbon I’ve tried in the Weller lineup (excluding WLW, which I’ve also been fortunate enough to sample a pour of). It’s also the only age-stated bottle in the rainbow.

Full disclosure: this was a bar pour, so I wasn’t sampling it under the usual controlled conditions. The bar was asking $23 for 2 ounces (!), but they gave me a steep discount in exchange for finishing the almost-empty bottle (FYI that’s not my hand holding the bottle in the photo 😂).

From the Distillery: As a standout in the wheated bourbon family, W.L. Weller 12 Year is aged significantly longer than most, resulting in a bourbon that is smooth, balanced, and remarkably refined, with a rich deep bronze hue.

Mashbill: Buffalo Trace mashbill #3 (wheated)

Age Statement: 12 years

Proof: 90

Appearance: A deep shade of amber;
nicely caramel colored with surprisingly decent legs.

Nose: Very much oak-forward, with a little grape, caramel, and spice.

Palate: Thin mouthfeel without a lot of complexity. There’s some fruit, caramel, and brown sugar on the front end, which transitions to baking spices on the mid-palate, but the dominant flavor is definitely oak.

Finish: Thin and short. Again, the primary note is oak, with a little spice and a touch of sweetness.

Thoughts: I wasn’t a really big fan of this one — quite frankly, it primarily tasted like oak water to me. There are plenty of 12-year bourbons that aren’t over-oaked, but this unfortunately doesn’t seem to be one of them. The good news is, trying it has definitely cured any FOMO that I may have been feeling about completing the Weller Rainbow!

Rating: Weller 12 earns a 5.4 on the modified T8ke scale: It’s “Good, Just Fine,” but — to me, at least — it’s not really anything special.

********************
Previous Ratings (updated to include decimals)

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)
Augusta Buckner’s 10yr (4.6)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.8)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5)
Stagg 25B (5.3)
Four Roses SBBP OBSV (5.3)
Weller 12 (5.4)
1792 BiB SiB (5.5)
Blanton’s (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.7)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.8)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Copper & Cask Boston Rum Party (6)
Copper & Cask #16 (6)
Penelope Wheated (6)
Blanton’s Gold (6.3)
Copper & Cask #14 DO (6.4)
Peerless DO (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Green River Wheated (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.6)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.8)

7 | Great | Well above average
Shortbarrel Bees Knees V (7)
Green River Honey (7)
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Peerless Toasted (7.1)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7.3)
Willett 4yr Rye (7.3)
Weller 107 (7.5)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.7)
Woodford Reserve DO SBBP (7.7)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.7)
Lasso Motel SBBP Rye (7.8)
Willett 8yr Rye (7.9)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.7)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

It’s time for a wheater showdown! This should be a good one, as it pits an allocated heavyweight against a budget favorite. I’ve reviewed each of these independently, but to this point have only been able to speculate about how they’d actually stack up against each other. Can the $35 whiskey actually take down – or even just compare favorably to – the bourbon that regularly goes for triple digits at stores and on the secondary market? Or is it not really a contest between them at all? Let’s find out!

*******************

ABOUT Weller Antique 107

*From the Distillery: The Original Wheated Bourbon. W.L. Weller Antique 107 is a robust wheated bourbon bottled at 107 proof that offers a full-bodied flavor with a bold, balanced finish. It remains a favorite among enthusiasts for its strength and smoothness. The taste is very well balanced with sweet fruit notes, strong vanilla undertone and sharp spicy tones, with a cinnamon finish.

*Mash bill: Buffalo Trace mash bill #3 (wheated)

*Age Statement: NAS

*Proof: 107

*Price: MSRP $69.99 ($159.99 or more at stores near me)

ABOUT Green River Wheated Bourbon

*From the Distillery: Our Wheated Bourbon leads with a beautiful peach and caramel aroma coupled with apricot and cinnamon. On the palate you’ll find toffee, pastry and hazelnut that guide toward a honeyed finish that’s smooth and balanced. The wheated expression lends itself to easy drinking while holding its own distinct character.

*Mash bill: 70% corn, 21% wheat, 9% malted barley

*Age Statement: NAS

*Proof: 90

*Price: $34.99

*******************

REVIEW: For the purpose of this blind, both bourbons have been poured into glencairns and rested for approximately 15 minutes.

Appearance A: A dark, caramel-ly shade of amber; moderately oily and viscous, with persistent legs on the glass.

Appearance B: Lighter amber; less viscous with slightly runnier legs.

Nose A: Right off the bat, there’s a strong whiff of grape. I think I already know what this is! There’s also some cherry, graham cracker, and confectionery sugar, along with a bit of toasted oak.

Nose B: Milder and woodier, but still sweet. Some apple is present along with caramel and vanilla. Also a bit of chocolate along with some pencil shavings, the latter of which is probably the wheat in the mashbill making itself known.

Palate A: Less sweet than the nose, but I still get grape and cherry right away, along with wheat and oak. It feels thick, bready, and substantial, and has some nice vanilla, caramel, and red apple notes as well. Just a solid wheated bourbon profile across the board.

Palate B: Much thinner and slightly more astringent; tastes youthy. Fairly sweet, with green apple candy as the primary flavor. It’s joined by caramel and a tiny hint of buttercream, along with some wheat flavor. Overall, it’s pleasant but not overly thick or complex.

Finish A: Slightly ethanol-forward; transitions briefly through a caramel-vanilla stage before oak and leather take over. Medium-length and slightly drying.

Finish B: Green apples, oak, and leather. Pretty short, but leaves behind a nice wheaty-breadiness.

Rating A: 7.5

Rating B: 6.5

Thoughts: These were very different experiences. A was thick, bready, and substantial, whereas B was much thinner and youthier-tasting, with strong hints of grassyness in the places where A had a stronger wheat profile. The varied proof points make a difference here, I’m sure, and the relative ages likely do as well (although we can’t be certain what those ages actually are). Overall, A was the superior pour in pretty much every respect: it was more robust in feel and taste, had more flavor, and drank like a more mature whiskey.

Prediction A: Weller Antique 107

Prediction B: Green River Wheated

********************

Actual A: Weller Antique 107

Actual B: Green River Wheated

More Thoughts: Well, I suppose that shouldn’t have been too surprising an outcome: Weller Antique 107 is superior to Green River’s budget-friendly wheated expression in pretty much every way. That doesn’t mean that the Weller is worth the money – that’s something that you have to decide for yourself. I personally don’t* *believe that Weller 107 is worth anything close to the $160 or more that I’ve seen it going for at stores in my areas (north GA and eastern MA). If that’s the asking price, then the choice for me is easy: Green River all day every day. However, In my opinion, the difference is worth the extra $25 over Green River if they’re both at MSRP.

As I think about it now, this probably wasn’t the fairest blind to run, as a classic like Weller 107, which has a proof point almost 20 points higher than Green River, was probably always going to win. I shouId probably follow it up with what may be a more apples-to-apples comparison: Green River vs. Weller’s 90-proof expression, Special Reserve. When it comes to that competition, I have a feeling that Green River will come out looking pretty darn good. We’ll see just how good when the time comes!

********************
Previous Ratings (updated to include decimals)

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)
Augusta Buckner’s 10yr (4.6)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.8)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5)
Stagg 25B (5.3)
Four Roses SBBP OBSV (5.3)
Evan Williams America250 SiB (5.3)
1792 BiB SiB (5.5)
Blanton’s (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.7)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.8)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Copper & Cask Boston Rum Party (6)
Copper & Cask #16 (6)
Penelope Wheated (6)
Blanton’s Gold (6.3)
Copper & Cask #14 DO (6.4)
Green River Wheated (6.5)
Peerless DO (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.6)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.8)

7 | Great | Well above average
Shortbarrel Bees Knees V (7)
Green River Honey (7)
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Peerless Toasted (7.1)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7.3)
Willett 4yr Rye (7.3)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Weller 107 (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.7)
Woodford Reserve DO SBBP (7.7)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.7)
Lasso Motel SBBP Rye (7.8)
Willett 8yr Rye (7.9)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.7)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

It’s America 250 week! In honor of the good ol’ U.S. of A., here’s a review of one of the myriad commemorative whiskeys that have been released for just that occasion. This one, which comes from Rhode Island-based Copper & Cask, is an 8-year rye whiskey that was finished in rum barrels (hence the name “Boston Rum Party”).

From the Producer: This rye is a blend of two rye lots -- one aged for 8 years and the other for 10 years. Both have a mash bill of 95% rye, 5% malted barley. The whiskey was finished in rum barrels for over a year. For this release, we wanted to find rum barrels that would complement the bold, spicy character of our rye with a sweeter, softer tone. The result is a bold yet approachable whiskey that is full of flavor with plenty of cinnamon spice and just the perfect amount of rum influence.

Release: 2000 bottles

Price: $74.99 MSRP

Age Statement: 8 years (blend of 8 and 10 year whiskeys)

Mashbill: 95% rye, 5% malted barley (MGP)

Proof: 120.2

Appearance: Medium shade of amber; slightly oily, with nice legs.

Nose: Smells like rye! After that initial wave of rye spice, there’s fig and plum, which combine to make a scent that could be described as holiday fruitcake. Cinnamon and caramel are also present, along with the pleasant breadiness that I typically associate with ryes.

Palate: Some astringency right away, which is immediately followed by rye spice, caramel, some grassiness, and leather. The mouthfeel is relatively thick and coating, and the rum cask finish isn’t overpowering. Other flavors include baking spices, red-hot candies, and citrus – essentially, it’s exactly what you’d expect from a slightly youthful MGP rye.

Finish: Medium-length, with significant spice and oaky bitterness that’s partially offset by touches of honey, caramel, and grass. As the finish goes on, the rye, oak, and leather remain, along with a very light touch of vanilla toffee.

Thoughts: Happy birthday, America! In your honor, Copper & Cask has made a very interesting whiskey expression. As I’ve said in prior reviews of their products (Batch 14 | Batch 16), they make very good blended whiskeys with two pretty consistent drawbacks: they’re astringent and they drink above their proof. While this one drinks at or near its ~120 proof, which is good, it does still suffer from the astringency issue.

Otherwise, it hits about the way you’d expect from something that’s based on a combination of 8- and 10-year MGP: with a good combination of rye spice and other complementary flavors. Taken all together, it almost makes for a really good pour. However, it also doesn’t hold up to MGP-based ryes that have more age on them; for example, Lasso Motel’s outstanding cask strength rye, which is a 13-year 95/5, runs circles around this Copper & Cask offering.

Rating: Copper & Cask’s “Boston Rum Party” expression isn’t a bad pour overall, but it also isn’t spectacular. For me, it rates a 6 on the T8ke scale: “Very Good – A Cut Above.”

********************
Previous Ratings (updated to include decimals)

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)
Augusta Buckner’s 10yr (4.6)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.8)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5)
Stagg 25B (5.3)
Four Roses SBBP OBSV (5.3)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.7)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.8)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Copper & Cask Boston Rum Party (6)
Copper & Cask #16 (6)
Penelope Wheated (6)
Green River Wheated (6.3)
Blanton’s Gold (6.3)
Copper & Cask #14 DO (6.4)
Peerless DO (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.6)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.8)

7 | Great | Well above average
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Peerless Toasted (7.1)
Weller 107 (7.2)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7.3)
Willett 4yr Rye (7.3)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.7)
Woodford Reserve DO SBBP (7.7)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.7)
Lasso Motel SBBP Rye (7.8)
Willett 8yr Rye (7.9)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.7)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

Chances are you’ve come across Doc Holliday whiskey at your local liquor store. I usually see it in somewhat gimmicky packaging, like in a decanter that comes with a replica Colt .45, or alongside a leather shoulder bag. Sales tactics that involve extras like that often raise the question for me of just how good the whiskey that comes with them really is. This’ll be my first time trying it, so let’s find out together!

This was distilled in north Georgia’s Mt. Airy, at Ivy Mountain distillery (which I believe is closed now). Thanks to u/ambulocetus_ for the sample!

From the Producer: Long before John Henry Holliday became known throughout these United States as "Doc" – and also "the slickest gunslinger in the west" – he was a darn good… dentist. Classically educated in Humanities and Mathematics, by 20, he graduated with a Doctor of Dental Surgery (hence the nickname) from one of the top schools in the nation.

Today we know him as the symbol of loyalty in the Wild West and the hero of the Gunfight at the O.K. Corral. Despite all the perils of the Frontier, he remained an even-tempered, well-mannered Southern gentleman until his untimely end at 36 years of age.
We salute Doc Holliday as the epitome of a true friend and a loyal companion.

Produced by: World Whiskey Society

Source: Ivy Mountain Distillery (GA)

Proof: 112

Appearance: Dark caramel colored and slightly viscous, although without much by way of legs on the glass.

Nose: The first whiff is an amazing buttered caramel (I know that caramel is already made with butter, but this has an extra butteriness to it). Next comes vanilla and honey – also very nice. There’s also red apple, cinnamon, and allspice, which are accompanied by maple and brown sugar. It’s nicely balanced overall, especially after that initial wave of buttery sweetness.

A couple drops of water change the complexion a bit, making it more red apple-forward than it was at full proof. Once the glass is empty, the remaining notes are red apple, leather, and toffee.

Palate: Fruit-forward with a medium mouthfeel. Some ethanol is present, but it’s countered by a combination of brown sugar, caramel, vanilla, molasses, oak, and leather, particularly on the mid-palate. Aside from that initial astringency, it’s pretty well-balanced. Once it hits the back of the palate, that buttery caramel flavor from the nose returns, making for a very nice end to the sip.

Finish: Hotter than the palate and short-to-medium length, but with nice flavor overall. Buttery caramel and a hint of apple persist for a bit before leaving you with the taste of oak and leather.

Thoughts: Given the gimmickry around it, I didn’t have the highest expectations for this whiskey. Surprisingly, it turned out to be pretty good! It did drink a bit hot for 112º, but not face-meltingly so. While I liked the combination of flavors, I would have liked it even more if that buttery caramel note had been more prominent across the palate and finish. However, that’s picking nits in what was overall a very enjoyable pour.

Rating: This Doc Holliday 10-year was a winner! Ultimately, I think it’s between “Very Good” and “Great” on the modified T8ke scale (6.6). I can’t vouch for the price being worth it, but I can safely say that the whiskey itself is worth a pour!

********************
Previous Ratings (updated to include decimals)

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)
Augusta Buckner’s 10yr (4.6)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.8)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5)
Stagg 25B (5.3)
Four Roses SBBP OBSV (5.3)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.7)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.8)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Copper & Cask #16 (6)
Penelope Wheated (6)
Green River Wheated (6.3)
Blanton’s Gold (6.3)
Copper & Cask #14 DO (6.4)
Peerless DO (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)
Doc Holliday 10yr (6.6)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.6)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.8)

7 | Great | Well above average
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Peerless Toasted (7.1)
Weller 107 (7.2)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7.3)
Willett 4yr Rye (7.3)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.7)
Woodford Reserve DO SBBP (7.7)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.7)
Lasso Motel SBBP Rye (7.8)
Willett 8yr Rye (7.9)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.7)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

At a time when some wheaters and four-grain bourbons are going for insane prices on secondary (looking at you, Weller and E.H. Taylor!), it seems like a good time for a blind battle of budget options in those categories.

I’ve reviewed each of these on their own (Green River | Penelope), but let’s see how they are compared to each other.

*******************

ABOUT Green River Wheated Bourbon

*From the Distillery: Green River Kentucky Straight Wheated Bourbon is a smooth, approachable expression that showcases the softer side of Kentucky distilling. By swapping rye for wheat in its high-wheat mash bill, this 90 proof wheated bourbon delivers a distinctly rounded palate with notes of peach, caramel, apricot, orange peel, and cinnamon. Toffee, pastry, and a hint of hazelnut carry into a honeyed, lasting finish. Aged onsite at Green River Distilling Co. in Owensboro, KY on the Kentucky Bourbon Trail, this wheated expression is made for those who prefer a softer, sweeter bourbon without sacrificing depth.

*Proof: 90

*Mashbill: 70% corn, 21% wheat, 9% malted barley

*Age Statement: NAS

*Price: $34.99

ABOUT Penelope Four-Grain Wheated Bourbon

*From the Producer: Penelope Wheated Bourbon is a carefully crafted expression that showcases our commitment to balance and versatility. With a smooth, approachable flavor profile, this bourbon offers a rich sweetness complemented by just the right touch of spice. At 95 proof, it strikes the ideal balance between boldness and drinkability, making it perfect for both sipping neat or using in a cocktail. This wheated bourbon is designed to appeal to a wide range of bourbon lovers, providing a nuanced yet accessible experience that stands out in any setting.

*Proof: 95

*Filtration: Non-Chill Filtered

*Age Statement: 4-6 years

*Mashbill: 74% Corn, 16% Wheat, 7% Rye, 3% Malted Barley

*Price: $36.99

*******************

REVIEW: For the purpose of this blind, both bourbons have been poured into glencairns and rested for approximately 15 minutes.

Appearance A: Amber; not very oily, with decent-length but ephemeral legs on the glass.

Appearance B: Slightly lighter amber and a touch more oily, with longer-lived legs.

Nose A: Red apple hits right off the bat, followed by cherry pie, créme brulée sugar, and cinnamon. Perhaps some graham cracker, as well. Little or no ethanol at all. Once the glass is empty, honey and caramel remain, along with a touch of leather.

Nose B: Sweet grape and cherry. A touch of citrus eventually makes its way to the top, where it’s paired with confectionary sugar. This one is slightly less complex, and also has little or no ethanol. Once the glass is empty, it’s all vanilla, honey, and leather.

Palate A: Medium-light mouthfeel with a touch of astringency. Less flavor than the nose suggested. The apples still come through, as does the graham cracker. Caramel is also present, but it’s unimposing and is joined by oak and wheat funk. The wheat and other grains hit more as the sip reaches the back of the palate.

Palate B: Slightly lighter, once again with a touch of astringency that suggests younger grain. Allspice is the main flavor on the front- and mid-palate, while wheat is primary once it hits the back. Some blackberry cobbler is here (which wasn’t present on the nose) is joined by tart green apple skin, as well as a bit of honey and caramel that eventually make an appearance.

Finish A: Spices (both rye and baking spices) go along with wheat, oak, and leather.

Finish B: Leather, oak, and some wheat funk, as well as touch of spice.

Rating A: 6 (“Very Good”)

Rating B: 6.3 (between “Very Good” and “Great”)

Thoughts: Both of these wheaters were light and pleasant. A was the spicier of the two: although not overpowering by any means, rye and baking spice seemed to be its main feature, whereas B was a bit less spicy and, in my opinion, more balanced without being overly sweet. I’d be happy to drink both of these again – especially on a hot day when something light and wheaty is called for – but my slight preference between the two is for B. I’m not sure what each is, but because I recall Penelope being a touch spicier than Green River, I’m going to cast my guesses in that direction.

Prediction A: Penelope Four-Grain

Prediction B: Green River Wheated

********************

Actual A: Penelope Four-Grain

Actual B: Green River Wheated

More Thoughts: Once again, these were both very enjoyable. It just so happens that my blind ratings here match the stand-alone ratings that I’ve given to each (see the Previous Ratings list below), and I’m happy to stand by those numbers. I preferred the Green River to the Penelope because it was more balanced with nice, smooth flavors, whereas the Penelope’s spice seemed to be fighting to be the chief flavor. That being said, I won’t hesitate to recommend both of these to anybody who’s seeking a nice, light wheater, especially at the price point that you can find each at. They’re about as budget-friendly as it gets, and are definitely worth the money!

********************
Previous Ratings (updated to include decimals)

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)
Augusta Buckner’s 10yr (4.6)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.8)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5)
Stagg 25B (5.3)
Four Roses SBBP OBSV (5.3)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.7)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.8)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Copper & Cask #16 (6)
Penelope Wheated (6)
Green River Wheated (6.3)
Blanton’s Gold (6.3)
Copper & Cask #14 DO (6.4)
Peerless DO (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.6)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.8)

7 | Great | Well above average
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Peerless Toasted (7.1)
Weller 107 (7.2)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7.3)
Willett 4yr Rye (7.3)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.7)
Woodford Reserve DO SBBP (7.7)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.7)
Lasso Motel SBBP Rye (7.8)
Willett 8yr Rye (7.9)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.7)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

I have to admit that Augusta is not a distillery that I have a lot of familiarity with (in fact, before I learned that there was an Augusta, Kentucky, I actually assumed that they were based in Georgia, at the home of the Masters!).

Since learning about the Kentucky Augusta, I’ve become pretty curious about their bourbons. This will be the first one I’ve actually tried, so I’m very much looking forward to seeing how it is. As a note up front, this bourbon is dangerously close to HAZMAT territory and I’m not typically a high-proof enthusiast, so we’ll see how it drinks in light of that potential palate discrepancy.

This bottle is a store pick from McFarland Wine and Spirits in Alpharetta, GA.

From the Producer: Our bourbon is just as suited for sipping solo on the front porch as it is to celebrating together with friends and family. The folks at Augusta Distillery pour their heart and soul into our products every day. We are in business to celebrate our community and build upon the lasting legacy of Augusta.

Our Buckner’s 10-year, single-barrel bourbon completes the brand’s ultra-premium lineup. As the youngest expression in this esteemed family, it provides a level of maturity not commonly found in younger distillations. Its full-cask strength commands attention while still offering an approachable entry for bourbon drinkers looking to explore top-tier options.

Proof: 136

Mashbill: Undisclosed

Age Statement: 10 Years

Price: $133.99

Appearance: A beautiful dark shade of amber. Appears fairly viscous, with persistent legs on the glass.

Nose: First off is a big whiff of ethanol. After a bit, this is supplemented (and partially balanced) by flavors like honey, vanilla, oak, dark fruit (primarily plum), and a lovely salted caramel. Following these, a strong chocolate-toffee note that’s reminiscent of a honey-infused Heath bar becomes prominent. This last one can be picked up even when I’m a foot or more away from the glass. Once it’s empty, the remaining notes include prominent honey, caramel, toffee, and a little leather. Overall, aside from that initial burst of ethanol, the nose is mostly nice, although there’s a funkiness hiding in there somewhere that hints at something less pleasant.

Palate: Very hot and proofy right off the bat, with a medium-oily mouthfeel and lots of lingering heat. The flavors are interesting – the Heath bar and honey are still there, as is plenty of oak and leather. The other flavors are a bit more muted, although some chewing brings them out a bit more. Primary among these is the dark fruit that was also on the nose, which now tastes more like prune.

However, there’s also a very prominent earthy note that’s not nearly as pleasant. I snuck a look at the official tasting notes, and sure enough – it calls out "wet soil” as one of the flavors that should be picked up on the palate. It’s there, all right, although I can’t say that it’s particularly enjoyable; in fact, it really takes away from the overall experience of this whiskey.

Finish: Very hot. Not quite as long as expected, but still long enough to keep my mouth on fire for a little more time than I would have liked. As that settles down, I’m left with very bitter oak or sour leather. Meanwhile, the “wet soil” flavor really springs into the foreground, where it combines with the oak to create a lingering flavor that’s definitely less than enjoyable. In fact, tor several minutes after the glass is empty, my mouth still tastes like I ate a taco made of leather-wrapped dirt.

Thoughts: The flavors here were interesting to say the least. The nose was largely nice, as were elements of the palate. However, that wet soil and bitter oak combination, which was prominent on the palate and even moreso on the finish, wasn’t very nice at all. It reminded me of another whiskey that I reviewed recently, a Found North ten-year single barrel, which was also made less enjoyable than it should have been by some overpowering earthy notes thanks to its Oloroso Sherry finish (that one was also a barrel pick from the same store that picked this one, so there’s a bit of an earthy theme going on here).

The Buckner’s 10-year is definitely a higher-proof whiskey than I’m typically comfortable with. It’s also very expensive. I actually selected this one because the 13-year, which was also available as a barrel pick, was well over $200, and I can’t justify that for any bottle that I don’t know ahead of time will be solidly in the excellent/incredible category (for example, Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend, Thomas H. Handy, or Eagle Rare 17-year).

While price won’t factor into my numeric rating, it definitely colors the conversation around a given whiskey, including how highly I can recommend it to others. At well over $100, this needed to be really good in order to be recommendable, and I just didn’t get that from it. I’m admittedly biased toward lower-proofers, but proof point aside, this just didn’t hit for me. The honey and Heath bar were spot on, both on the nose and on the palate, but they were drowned out by an oakiness and an earthiness that really stole the show in a decidedly not-great way.

Rating: The Augusta Buckner’s 10-Year Single Barrel earns just a 4.6 from me on the modified T8ke scale (between “Better Exists” and “Just Fine”), due to the significant drawbacks that unfortunately drowned out its more enjoyable elements.

********************
Previous Ratings (updated with decimal points)

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)
Augusta Buckner’s 10yr (4.6)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.8)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5)
Stagg 25B (5.3)
Four Roses SBBP OBSV (5.3)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.7)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.8)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Penelope Wheated (6)
Green River Wheated (6.3)
Blanton’s Gold (6.3)
Copper & Cask #14 DO (6.4)
Peerless Double Oaked (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.6)
Sagamore Rye 9yr (6.7)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.8)

7 | Great | Well above average
Peerless Toasted (7.1)
Weller 107 (7.2)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7.3)
Willett 4yr Rye (7.3)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.7)
Woodford Reserve DO BP (7.7)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.7)
Lasso Motel SiB CS Rye (7.8)
Willett 8yr SiB Rye (7.9)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.7)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

For the longest time, WIllett Family Estate was best known (to me, at least) as the maker of the potion bottle that contained some pretty poor bourbon. Their purple- and green-top whiskeys, on the other hand, are a different matter. The older of these can be pretty divisive given the $30-$40 per year of age that they frequently go for. I really enjoyed their 4-year rye, but to this point I haven’t had a chance to taste any of their more aged expressions. Thanks to a sample generously provided by u/ambulocetus_, I was able to give this 8-year rye a try. Let’s see how it was!

Age Statement: 8 years

Mash bill: 74% Rye, 11% Corn, 15% Malted Barley

Filtration: Non-chill filtered

Barrel Number: 3078

Proof: 105

Appearance: Deep caramel and slightly oily

Nose: Fruity and herbal: some fruit and floral scents meet the typical dill and mint that come with rye whiskeys. Caramel and vanilla are there as well. Once the glass is empty, it’s all caramel and leather with lots of dill.

Palate: Sweet and herbal at the same time, and not proofy at all. This is similar to the 4-year in its sweetness, but it’s also significantly more complex with its layers of flavor. Rye is there, of course, and the sweet nectar of honeysuckle is also present. There’s also a flavor like fresh peach, along with dill (and a small amount of mint). Oak and tobacco are there as well, along with cinnamon and allspice.

Finish: Medium-length and not overly spicy. The peach and honeysuckle flavors linger for a bit, along with cinnamon and dill, before giving way to tobacco, oak, and burnt sugar. After that, leather, dill, and the slightest bit of vanilla honey remain.

Thoughts: I’m a fan of the Willett 4-year rye, which earned a 7.3 from me on the modified T8ke scale. This is even better than that, with flavors and complexity that make it a cut above its younger brother. Frankly, I wish more ryes were like this, taking advantage of the combination of sweetness, herbal notes, and spice that this grain can provide to a whiskey. Overall, it’s very good; the only nit I can pick is that the dill note is a little strong across nose, palate, and finish. That’s the one thing keeping this from being an full-on 8 on the T8ke scale.

Rating: Willett Family Estate’s 8-year Rye Whiskey is really, really good, and I’d drink it again any time. I can’t speak to the overall value – to each their own when it comes to high-dollar purchases! – but I can and do recommend the bottle’s contents to anybody who likes their ryes to have fairly complex layers of sweetness, fruitiness, and herbal notes. For me, this is a 7.9 on the modified T8ke scale: it’s much closer to “Excellent – Really Quite Exceptional” than it is to being just “Great.”

********************
Previous Ratings (updated with decimal points)

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.8)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5)
Stagg 25B (5.3)
Four Roses SBBP OBSV (5.3)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.7)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.8)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Penelope Wheated (6)
Green River Wheated (6.3)
Blanton’s Gold (6.3)
Copper & Cask #14 DO (6.4)
Peerless Double Oaked (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.6)
Sagamore Rye 9yr (6.7)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.8)

7 | Great | Well above average
Peerless Toasted (7.1)
Weller 107 (7.2)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7.3)
Willett 4yr Rye (7.3)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.7)
Woodford Reserve DO BP (7.7)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.7)
Lasso Motel SiB CS Rye (7.8)
Willett 8yr Rye (7.9)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8.1)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.7)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

Both of these Buffalo Trace bourbons are single barrel offerings, and both use BT’s high-rye Mashbill #2. Both are also allocated and overpriced in most stores.

I’ve done stand-alone reviews of both (Blanton’s | Elmer T. Lee), but let’s pour a blind here and see how they rate against each other!

*******************

ABOUT Blanton’s Single Barrel

*From the Distillery: This bourbon made history as the first ever bottled from a single barrel, and it still carries that sense of discovery today. Once shared by Colonel Blanton only with a close circle of ambassadors and friends, Blanton’s Original is now here for anyone curious to experience a bolder side of bourbon. Discover the bourbon that set a new standard.

*Mash bill: Buffalo Trace mash bill #2 (high rye)

*Rick: 27

*Barrel: 302

*Dumped On: 6-10-2025

*Proof: 93

*Price: MSRP is $69.99, but as we all know, it can go for a whole lot more

ABOUT Elmer T. Lee Single Barrel

*From the Distillery: Named after Master Distiller Emeritus Elmer T. Lee, this whiskey is hand-selected and bottled to the very standards he set. Perfectly balanced and rich, just as declared by the man who knew great bourbon intended.

*Mash bill: Buffalo Trace mash bill #2 (high rye)

*Proof: 90

*Price: MSRP is about $80, but I’ve seen it for $150-$200

*******************

REVIEW: For the purpose of this blind, both bourbons have been poured into glencairns and rested for approximately 30 minutes.

Appearance A: Medium-light amber. Low viscosity.

Appearance B: Slightly lighter amber, also with low viscosity.

Nose A: Very sweet, with confectionary sugar and buttercream frosting leading the way. After that, some red fruit makes its way forward, along with a very strong note of that classic Buffalo Trace grape. Once the glass is empty, it’s all caramel, vanilla, and leather.

Nose B: Just as sweet, but without the grape. Caramel and vanilla frosting hit right off the bat, followed by a little oak and spice. Once the glass is empty, the remaining notes are toffee, honey, and a bit of spice.

Palate A: Fairly sweet and grape-y. Slightly bready, as well, with oak that becomes more prominent as the sip goes on. A little bit of spice – primarily rye, but also some baking spices like cinnamon and clove. There’s also a bit of caramel and the slightest note of honey, but they’re both in the background.  

Palate B: Watery and not very flavorful. Some ethanol hits off the bat, followed by spice and oak. These are accompanied by a small amount of caramel, honey, and vanilla.

Finish A: Short but warming, with leather and bitter oak as the primary elements.

Finish B: Medium-length and fairly bitter, with oak and spices as the main flavors.

Rating A: 5.5 (better than just “Good,” but not quite “Very Good”)

Rating B: 5 (Good)

Thoughts: This was a surprisingly underwhelming blind. I expected one of these – specifically, Elmer T. Lee – to stand out as clearly being the better of the two options here, but it never did. Both of these were perfectly fine pours, but neither separated itself by even reaching the “Very Good” level on the T8ke scale. This actually makes guessing which is which a more difficult task. My assumption is that ETL was the grapier of the two, and that Blanton’s was the one that was waterier on the palate.

Prediction A: Elmer T. Lee

Prediction B: Blanton’s

********************

Actual A: Elmer T. Lee

Actual B: Blanton’s

More Thoughts: While the secondary prices for both of these are absurd, I did have higher expectations of Elmer T. Lee than I did of Blanton’s, and it’s a bit disappointing to me that it didn’t reward those expectations by showing itself to be the clearly better pour of the two. When I reviewed ETL on its own, I found it to be enjoyable enough to give it a rating of 6.7 (between “Very Good” and “Great”). Here, though, it didn’t even rise to the level of “Very Good.”

Frankly, if I had to choose between the two based solely on this blind, I’d open door number three and grab a bottle of John J. Bowman Single Barrel. Otherwise, there are no real winners here.

********************
Previous Ratings

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.4)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.8)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5)
Stagg 25B (5.3)
Four Roses SBBP OBSV (5.3)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.7)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.8)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Penelope Wheated (6)
Blanton’s Gold (6.3)
Green River Wheated (6.4)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)
Copper & Cask #14 DO (6.6)
Peerless Double Oaked (6.6)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.7)
Sagamore Rye 9yr (6.7)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.9)

7 | Great | Well above average
Peerless Toasted (7)
Weller 107 (7.2)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7.3)
Willett 4yr Rye (7.3)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.7)
Woodford Reserve DO BP (7.7)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.7)
Lasso Motel SiB CS Rye (7.8)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8.1)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.7)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

The recipe for this 9-year Four Roses single barrel is OBSV, which stands for Four Roses Distillery, mashbill B (high rye), straight distillation, and delicate fruit. As that last suggests, OBSV is supposed to feature fruit and vanilla. Let’s see how it is!

This single barrel is a store pick from Cumming Beverage Mart in north Georgia, a place where – as I’ve noted in previous reviews – I have not had much luck finding picks that match my palate (in face, the only two “2” ratings I’ve given out were from here). However, maybe this will be the exception!

From the Distillery: OBSV is the most rounded and versatile of our recipes at all ages. The extra rye of the B mash bill creates the dominant flavor with this recipe. The bright and slightly spicy character is apparent at any age, and the delicate fruit flavors created by the V yeast strain round out the complex palate with flavors of apricot, pear and plum. As this recipe ages in the barrel, the typical caramel and vanilla flavors develop, but the rich flavor of cocoa, cinnamon, and nutmeg are especially pronounced in the OBSV recipes. Overall the OBSV recipe is rich, bright, and complex with a long and mellow finish. 

Warehouse: CN

Barrel: 78-4R

Mash bill: Four Roses mash bill B: 60% Corn, 35% Rye, 5% Malted Barley

Proof: 119.2

Age Statement: 9 Years, 9 Months

Price: $74.99

Appearance: Deep amber with decent legs.

Nose: Initially caramel, toffee, and vanilla. After the pour opens up a bit, the smell of a honeycrisp apple orchard begins wafting out of the glass. There’s also some allspice present. Once the glass is empty, toffee and vanilla remain, along with leather and a bit of red fruit.

Palate: Medium-thick viscosity. The spice hits right away, as expected from a whiskey with a high-rye mashbill. There are standard caramels, vanillas, and baking spices, but that orchardy flavor also comes through. It’s light, crisp, and sweet – again, like honeycrisp apples. There’s also a buttercream frosting note that supports the red apple flavor, bringing it even more into the foreground.

Finish: Somewhat drying, and also a bit bitter. Oak is prominent, along with spice. After a bit of time, a red apple flavor makes a very faint appearance, ever-so-slightly balancing out the bitterness.

Thoughts: Surprisingly, this was less spicy on the palate than the low-rye OESO that I reviewed earlier. It was also better in pretty much every way. That’s not to say that it was an excellent pour; frankly, the amount of spice on the palate was still a bit off-putting for me, as it took away from the nice, crisp apple flavor that would have been even better had it been more prominent. I’ll probably reach for this one on some occasions, but nowhere near as often as I reach for other, less-spicy bourbons on my shelf.

Rating: This Four Roses Barrel Proof OBSV barrel pick rates a 5.3 for me — it’s slightly better than “Good, Just Fine,” but it doesn’t rise to the level of “Very Good.” The fruit flavor was enjoyable, but the overall profile wasn’t balanced enough to take advantage of that element.

********************
Other Ratings

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.8)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5)
Stagg 25B (5.3)
Four Roses SBBP OBSV (5.3)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.7)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.8)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Penelope Wheated (6)
Green River Wheated (6.3)
Blanton’s Gold (6.3)
Copper & Cask #14 DO (6.5)
Peerless Double Oaked (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.6)
Elmer T. Lee (6.7)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.8)

7 | Great | Well above average
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Peerless Toasted (7.1)
Weller 107 (7.2)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7.3)
Willett 4yr Rye (7.3)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.7)
Woodford Reserve DO BP (7.7)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.7)
Lasso Motel SiB CS Rye (7.8)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8.1)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.7)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

{{ Note: Sometimes two whiskeys are very good, but their flavors are so uncomplementary that it takes away from the overall experience. As it turned out, that was definitely the case here!! }}

Sazerac Full Proof is a budget powerhouse from Buffalo Trace, clocking in at 125 proof for just $37.99. Lasso Motel, on the other hand, is relatively new to me – I tried it for the first time just a couple weeks ago, but it stood out as being a really, really good cask strength rye whiskey. Neither of these ryes is chill filtered, and the lowest proof point here is Saz FP’s 125º.

I’ve also done stand-alone reviews of both of these ryes ( Sazerac Full Proof | Lasso Motel ), as well as a blind comparison between Saz FP and the 2025 edition of Thomas H. Handy Sazerac (link here).

Let’s pour a blind and see how these compare!

********************

ABOUT Sazerac Full Proof

* From the Distillery: Bottled at 125 proof, Sazerac Rye Full Proof amplifies the brand’s signature spicy, peppery, and dry profile, delivering a sipping whiskey of remarkable intensity. At the same time, it highlights the versatility of Sazerac Rye and reflects Buffalo Trace Distillery’s commitment to crafting exceptional whiskey experiences for enthusiasts at every stage of their rye journey.

This non-chill-filtered rye whiskey foregoes chill filtration to preserve all the naturally occurring residual oils and flavors that occur during the distillation and aging process (potentially making it appear cloudy at cold temperatures).

* Proof: 125°

* Price: $37.99

* Age Statement: NAS

* Filtration: Non-chill filtered

ABOUT Lasso Motel Cask Strength Rye

* From the Producer: If it tasted any better, you’d think it was a setup. Lasso Motel’s Single Barrel Cask Strength Rye is a straight shot from barrel to bottle. You can’t rush perfection, which is why this uncut and unfiltered whiskey is aged 10 years. The nose is woody, warm, and sweet with spicy apple, dark fruit, and cinnamon. The tasting notes open with a pepper rye spice that mellows out through a cinnamon sweetness and char.

* Mashbill: 95% Rye, 5% Malted Barley (MGP)

* Barreled: 10/19/2012

* Bottle Number: 90/96

* Proof: 136º

* Price: $89.99

* Age Statement: At least 10 Years (this one is actually a 13-year)

* Filtration: Non-chill filtered

*******************

REVIEW: For the purpose of this blind, both rye whiskeys have been poured into glencairns and rested for approximately 30 minutes.

Appearance A: Medium amber. Fairly oily with nice legs.

Appearance B: Deep amber – almost mahogany. Also oily, with longer and more persistent legs.

Nose A: Some ethanol at first. After that, there’s a wave of vanilla, caramel, and spice. Maybe some pie crust or cobbler-esque crumble. Some citrus and herbal notes are also there, but they’re not overpowering. All in all, it’s a very nice nose. Once the glass is empty, it’s all leather and vanilla.

Nose B: Very different, in a much darker way. Chocolate-covered toffee and tobacco are there right away, along with some stewed dark fruits. There’s a breadiness here that I also like, which combined with the chocolate-covered toffee almost gives the feel of a chocolate croissant or cocoa-dipped Biscoff cookie. Honey and caramel come wafting up next, and I can smell them from a good foot away. Once the glass is empty, dark toffee, vanilla, and leather remain.

It’s hard to compare the two noses, as they’re incredibly different and also both very good.

Palate A: Medium viscosity, with rye spice and proof heat that reach out and touch you right off the bat. This is a really spicy sip, and it’s also slightly astringent. A little breadiness rises up to meet the mid-palate, along with baking spices like anise and clove. There’s also a little leather and tobacco. The citrus and herbal notes (probably dill) come back in at the end of the sip, but the rye spice in particular makes its presence felt through the entirety of the pour.

Palate B: Very thick and coating, and very interesting. There are several flavors at play here, and it’s difficult to pick them all out. As with the nose, they’re much darker than A’s flavors were. There’s a good deal of oak and other, more unique woody flavors, along with the dark fruit from the nose. In addition to these, there’s also a flavor like caramel apples, but it’s not the light, sweet caramel you might be thinking of; rather, it’s a dark, bittersweet caramel, which is accompanied by burnt brown sugar and molasses.

Finish A: Medium-length. Mostly spices, herbs, and oak, with a little bitter citrus added to the mix.

Finish B: Long, spicy, and proofy, leaving the tongue burning for a little while. The dark fruit, toffee, and tobacco are still there, along with bitter oak and some leather.

Rating A: 6 (Very Good)

Rating B: 6.5 (better than “Very Good,” but not quite “Great”)

Thoughts: Although these are different proofs (125º and 133°), they didn’t necessarily drink that way. The proof heat on B was mostly felt on the finish; the sip itself seemed to get its spiciness from the rye, just as A’s heat and spice were mostly because of the rye. However, these two whiskies had very, very different profiles: A was more spicy and citrusy, whereas B was much thicker, richer, and darker. Ultimately, I think B was the better of the two.

Prediction A: Sazerac Full Proof

Prediction B: Lasso Motel Cask Strength

********************

Actual A: Sazerac Full Proof

Actual B: Lasso Motel Cask Strength

More Thoughts: This was a case of a blind comparison not being the best way to approach two whiskeys. Their flavors were not at all complementary, so pairing them together made for a total experience that was significantly less than the sum of its parts.

If I were drinking either one alone, they would rate much higher than they did here, just because of that clash of flavors (a fact you can see in my stand-alone reviews of each, where both scored significantly better!). I really do recommend both Sazerac Full Proof, which I rated 6.5 on its own, and especially Lasso Motel Cask Strength, which was close to an 8 for me. Both are very good high-proof rye whiskeys, but – if you do try them – I definitely don’t recommend that you drink them together!

********************
Other Ratings (note: I’m going to start updating my ratings with more decimal places to differentiate them, as some of the numbers are getting pretty crowded!)

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.8)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5.1)
Stagg 25B (5.3)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.6)
Old Forester 1924 (5.7)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.8)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Penelope Wheated (6)
Green River Wheated (6.3)
Blanton’s Gold (6.3)
Copper & Cask #14 DO (6.4)
Peerless Double Oaked (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.6)
Elmer T. Lee (6.7)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.8)

7 | Great | Well above average
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Peerless Toasted (7.1)
Weller 107 (7.1)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7.3)
Willett 4yr Rye (7.3)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.6)
Woodford Reserve DO BP (7.7)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.7)
Lasso Motel SiB CS Rye (7.8)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8.1)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.7)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

I’ll get this out there right off the bat: I’m a pretty big fan of toasted bourbons. I like double oaked expressions, as well, but where those can vary widely (for example, from the almost-cloying Woodford Double Oaked, to the almost-overpowering Copper & Cask offering, to Peerless’s own dark and dense expression), toasted whiskeys generally seem to follow similar profiles. This is probably at least partly because of the significant quantities of vanillin that are released as a result of the barrel-toasting process, which results in a profile that I really enjoy.

Let’s dive into this one!

From the Distillery: Peerless Toasted Bourbon is aged in two separate oak barrels.  It is initially aged in their standard, char level 3, barrel. This process develops the desired flavor profiles of caramel, brown sugar, and toffee. The already barrel-aged whiskey is then placed in a toasted barrel to finish. The toasted barrel adds more complexity with honey, vanilla, toasted spices, and chocolate.  The unique aging process allows for an elevated nose and palate.

Toasted Bourbon is aged in our standard char level 3 barrel for 5 years. It takes about 30-35 seconds to achieve the perfect flavor profile with a char level 3. Hemicellulose starts breaking down into wood sugars and the wood caramelizes inside the barrel. This process develops our desired flavor profiles. Think caramel, brown sugar, and toffee. The already barrel-aged whiskey is then placed into a toasted barrel to finish. This toasted barrel adds more complexity with honey, vanilla, toasted spices, and chocolate!

Proof: 108.6

Filtration: Non-chill filtered

Age: At least 5 years

Price: $74.99

Appearance: Peerless’s classic rich mahogany, with decent legs on the glass.

Nose: Oak, honey, maple syrup, vanilla, and caramel. The last two might also be described as combining to make a nice butterscotch-y note. A little ethanol, but it’s not overpowering. Once the glass is empty, the remaining scent is pure vanilla.

Palate: A rush of rye spice hits first and stays at the forefront for the entire sip. It’s joined by barrel char, honey, brown sugar, baking spices, and plenty of vanilla from the toasted barrel. There are also dark chocolate and crème brûlée notes that add a little complexity to the experience. Overall, the palate features several well-blended flavors, although rye never relinquishes its leading role.

Finish: Spice-forward like the palate, along with leather, some vanilla and caramel, and lots of oak. Pretty drying.

Thoughts: This is a nice sipper, although it surprised me how rye-forward it was. This could be a drawback; as I said in my review of a New Riff single barrel, if I wanted to a super rye-forward pour, then I could cut out the middle man and just grab one of the several rye whiskies that I have on my shelf. However, Peerless Toasted also features a well-orchestrated symphony of background flavors that give it some complexity and balance.

That being said, the pour does remain spicy across both the palate and the finish. If that’s not your jam, then this bourbon may not be it either. I will say, though, that whatever you think of it as a neat sipper, this whiskey works very well in an Old Fashioned (as well as in a chocolate old fashioned, with chocolate liqueur and cocoa bitters). That’s not a knock on it, as to me any whiskey can be a “mixer” — it’s not an insult to the bottle to use it for that, so much as it is another way to get the most out of the whiskey inside.

Rating: Peerless Toasted is a very good bourbon – one I’d reach for both as a sipper and as a mixer. For me, value aside, it’s a solid 7 on the T8ke scale: “Great — Well Above Average.” I recommend it to fans of toasted bourbons everywhere!

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SiB BP (5)
Stagg 25B (5)
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.5)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.5)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Green River Wheated (6)
Penelope Wheated (6)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.5)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.5)
Copper & Cask #14 DO (6.5)
Blanton’s Gold (6.5)
Peerless Double Oaked (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)

7 | Great | Well above average
Peerless Toasted (7)
Weller 107 (7)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7)
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Willett 4yr Rye (7)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Woodford Reserve DO BP (7.5)
Lasso Motel SiB CS Rye (7.5)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.5)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North Batch 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.5)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

Found North’s Batch 012 was released just ten days ago, and it’s the first true batch of theirs that I’ve had the opportunity to try.

My only other experience with this producer was a single-barrel store pick that had been finished in Oloroso Sherry casks, which I very much did not care for. However, I’ve heard wonderful things about Found North’s other releases, and I’m excited to see how this one holds up. Let’s get to it!

From the Producer: At the heart of Batch 012 is a 16-year corn component matured for 11 months in lower-warehouse conditions in ISC Cooper's Reserve, 24-Month Air-Seasoned, Heavy Toast, Char #2 New American Oak. It presented a savory, lightly phenolic and high-vanillin profile notably distinct from previous Batches.

All of the 11 components, ranging from 16 to 22 years old, were critical to the blend, but these three anchor the new wood profile. Layered together, they form a burnt brown sugar and roasted marshmallow quality that sets the course for the entire blend.

- 2009 Corn in ISC Cooper's Reserve, 24-Month Air-Seasoned, Heavy Toast, Char #2 New American Oak
- 2003 Corn in Kelvin Heavy Toast, Char #1 New American Oak
- 2004 Rye in Chevalier Heavy Toast, Char #3 New American Oak

Because the 2009 corn component aged in 24-Month Air-Seasoned, Heavy Toast, Char #2 ISC casks was a treasure. The smoldering toasted notes allowed our blending team to take Batch 012 and give it the distinctiveness that we always search for with our Batches.

“Component blends” have become a key part of our process. We have found that components often benefit from blending before we rerack them. 5 of the 11 components in Batch 012 were part of a component blend that we aged in Heavily Toasted French Oak:

- 16yr corn in New American Oak, ISC 24-month Air-Seasoned, Heavy Toast, Char #2
- 20yr corn in Used American Oak
- 20yr corn in New American Oak, ISC 24-month Air-Seasoned, Heavy Toast, Char #2
- 22yr corn in New American Oak, Kelvin Heavy Toast, Char #1
- 20yr rye in Used American Oak

The other 6 components were:

- 16yr corn in New American Oak, ISC 24-month Air-Seasoned, Heavy Toast, Char #2
- 20yr corn in New American Oak, ISC 18-month Air-Seasoned, Heavy Toast, Char #2
- 22yr corn in New American Oak, Medium Toast, Char #2
- 22yr corn in New American Oak, Kelvin Heavy Toast, Char #1
- 20yr rye in New American Oak, Chevalier Heavy Toast, Char #3
- 22yr rye in Used American Oak

For Batch 012 Manager’s Proof add 0.15mL to a 50mL pour. Candidly, this is a very small amount of liquid. It will change the proof from 128.2 to 127.8. The change is subtle, but we felt the undercurrents of fruit pop while the palate shifts from hearty and spicy to rich and velvety. The landing and the finish see a slight reduction in spice, but the mouthcoating creaminess takes over the entire palate from start to finish.

Age Statement: 16 years

Proof: 128.2

Price: $119.99 $149.99 (edit: my mistake)

Appearance: Rich amber; oily with persistent legs on the glass.

Nose: Sweet and floral at first, with corn front and center. Some burnt sugar, like on the top of a crème brûlée, along with vanilla buttercream frosting. As it breathes more, I get a little spice and some bright red fruit (especially at manager’s proof), both of which are followed by lots of caramel, molasses, and dark chocolate. This smells like a wonderfully toasted whisky, and the nose is more complex than I expected after the corn-forward first sniff. Once the glass is empty, the remaining notes are primarily leather, caramel, and dark chocolate.

Palate: Fairly viscous and coating. Very corn- and ethanol-forward at first; honestly, at first blush this drinks more like a light whisky. It’s light and sweet, with some floral notes. As with the nose, there’s not a lot of spice (which is fine with me!).

None of that lasts, though, as this dram refuses to be defined in such simple terms. After that initial corn-fed sweetness, the pour turns darker and richer, with caramel, cocoa, burnt sugar, and even custard there to go along with some nuttiness and (unfortunately) a little earthiness. At the end of the sip, I actually get a vegetal note almost like stewed green beans (that’s an interesting one I haven’t experienced before; thankfully, it’s a very subtle note!). Stone fruits like dark cherry and perhaps some apricot are also present.

Finish: Here’s where the spice comes in! My tongue is left burning a bit as the finish progresses, which isn’t my favorite feeling. The rest is mostly molasses, dark cocoa, tobacco, oak, and baking spice, along with a little nuttiness and (again unfortunately) some earth. The finish is moderate to long – especially the spicy part. Once that fades (finally!), I’m left with the combination of oak, tobacco, vanilla, and earthiness.

Thoughts: This foray into Found North’s batch series was interesting to say the least, as there was a lot going on in this pour. In their tasting notes, Found North describes “quadrants” of flavor. I didn’t really understand what that meant until trying this a couple times and seeing just how amazingly complex it really is. Overall, I think I appreciated all the different things that this whisky was doing even more than I actually enjoyed drinking it, if that makes sense.

I also tried Batch 012 at Manager’s Proof, which meant diluting it ever so slightly, from 128.2° to 127.8°. Surprisingly, that actually made a noticeable difference in the whisky: it helped bring out floral and especially red fruit notes, while reducing the spiciness somewhat. At the same time, that ever-so-slight reduction in proof served to hide some of the dark, sweet notes that were an enjoyable part of this pour at full proof. Frankly, it was almost like drinking two different whiskies, despite their being only 0.4 proof points apart!

Rating: Found North’s Batch 012 rates an 8 for me on the T8ke scale: “Excellent – Really Quite Exceptional.” With its combination of proof and complexity, this is a whisky that I’ll recommend to folks with more sophisticated palates, even if I don’t reach for it every day myself!

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SiB BP (5)
Stagg 25B (5)
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.5)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.5)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Green River Wheated (6)
Penelope Wheated (6)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.5)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.5)
Copper & Cask DO (6.5)
Blanton’s Gold (6.5)
Peerless Double Oaked (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)

7 | Great | Well above average
Weller 107 (7)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7)
Sagamore 9yr Rye (7)
Willett 4yr Rye (7)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Woodford Reserve DO (7.5)
Lasso Motel SiB Rye (7.5)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.5)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Found North Batch 012 (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.5)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

{{ note: this one could be a bit controversial! }}

These bourbons have two different proofs and two different mash bills, but are part of one collection: Old Forester’s Whiskey Row series.

I’ve done stand-alone reviews of both ((1924 | 1910)), and in both write-ups, I noted that I tend to find Old Forester’s 1910 expression to be slightly more enjoyable than the 1924. However, I also individually rated each of them as a 7 (“Great – Well Above Average”), which suggests that they’re actually pretty close together in quality and enjoyability, if not in value (which I try to leave out of my numeric ratings).

Let’s pour a blind and see how they actually stack up!

ABOUT Old Forester 1924

*From the Distillery: The Whiskey Row Series’ 1924 10-Year-Old is a limited annual release celebrating another milestone in Old Forester’s storied history. During Prohibition, more than 200 distilleries were forced to close. Old Forester, however, continued operations because the federal government issued us one of six medicinal licenses, P-3. In 1924, Old Forester acquired barrels from closed distillers, with different mash bills, and bottled that liquid as Old Forester. This release commemorates that moment in time.

With a new mash bill and 10-year age statement, 1924 features a unique taste unlike any other Old Forester expression, but fits perfectly within our storytelling Whiskey Row series.

*Mash bill: 79% Corn, 11% Rye, 10% Malted Barley

*Proof: 100º

*Price: MSRP $119.99

ABOUT Old Forester 1910

*From the Distillery: Two Barrels. One Fine Bourbon. On October 22nd, 1910, a fire on the bottling line halted production of Old Forester. Mature whisky ready to be bottled, instead was stored in a secondary barrel. What emerged was a delightful whisky, remarkable enough to become an entirely new expressions – Old Fine Whisky.

Today, mimicking this historic bottling, this unique expression of Old Forester has undergone a second barreling, granting it exceptional character, a smooth and sweet flavor and a clean, crisp finish. Entering the second barrel at a low 100 proof allows more of the sweet wood sugars to dissolve into the whiskey. 1910 Old Fine Whiskey is the fourth and final expression of the Whiskey Row Series, presented at 93 proof.

*Mash bill: 72% corn, 18% rye, 10% malted barley

*Proof: 93º

*Price: $49.99

*******************

REVIEW: For the purpose of this blind, both bourbons have been poured into glencairns and rested for approximately 30 minutes.

Appearance A: Dark amber. Doesn’t appear very viscous. Short-lived legs on the glass.

Appearance B: Almost mahogany. A little more viscous-looking with longer-lived legs.

Nose A: First and foremost, I’m smelling my nemesis: banana. As I’ve said before, it probably seems particularly strong because I dislike it so much, a fact that makes me more sensitive to even a little of it than I otherwise would (or should) be. Pushing past that, I get toffee and a bit of chocolate, but they’re very faint. Once the glass is empty, it’s all banana.

Nose B: Caramel, vanilla, toffee, and dark chocolate – almost like a combination of Heath bar and Rolos candy. A bit of oak and barrel char, as well. Once the glass is empty, caramel and vanilla remain.

Palate A: Thankfully the banana doesn’t come through too badly from the nose! I’m getting toffee and tobacco primarily, although other flavors are introduced as the sip develops: dark cherry or blackberry cobbler, toffee, some leather, and a nutty note of some sort are among the most prominent.

Palate B: Butterscotch and vanilla, with a little more of that dark chocolate and barrel char coming into play as it hits the mid-palate. There’s also an almost vegetal note, but it’s not very prominent. This sip isn’t as complex as A was, but what’s there is very nice – it’s sweet but also nicely balanced.

Finish A: There’s that banana again! Initially, it combines with barrel char, oak, and tobacco. As those notes fade out, I’m left with a strong, bitter flavor like cigar ash. The finish is relatively long, which I’d ordinarily appreciate except that it’s made up entirely of that ashy note, which isn’t terribly pleasant.

Finish B: Shorter but more enjoyable. Caramel, vanilla, and leather are the most prominent remaining notes as the finish fades out.

Rating A: 5.5 (better than just “Good,” but not quite “A Cut Above”)

Rating B: 7.5 (between “Great” and “Excellent”)

Thoughts: Wow, these weren’t as close as I expected them to be! For me, other than complexity on the palate, B was superior to A in pretty much every way. It had a more appealing nose, a sweeter palate, and a much more enjoyable finish. The banana on A’s nose and finish was really off-putting for me, and while A had a much longer finish than B, the longest-lasting flavor was pure cigar ash, which I didn’t appreciate all that much.

Overall, B was the bourbon that better fit my preferred profile, and I enjoyed it much more than I did A. Because I recall that banana note on the 1924 from previous times that I’ve drunk it, my guess is that it’s A, and that B is the 1910.

Prediction A: Old Forester 1924

Prediction B: Old Forester 1910

********************

Actual A: Old Forester 1924

Actual B: Old Forester 1910

More Thoughts: For me, the clear winner of this blind was the bourbon that isn’t more expensive and harder to find. I’m partially surprised – not that I preferred the 1910, nor that there were clear differences between the two, but that the 1910 was that much better than its Whiskey Row counterpart.

I gave Old Forester 1910 a 7 in my stand-alone review of that bourbon. After this blind, the 7 that I also gave to the 1924 now seem like serious grade inflation. This isn’t to say that I think Old Forester 1924 is a bad whiskey by any means, so much as it is to note that it really, really doesn’t match up with my palate, which does not play well with banana (this is also part of why my reviews of Jack Daniel’s products have frequently featured pretty low scores).

Ultimately, I’m not terribly upset that I prefer the cheaper and more available of these by a pretty fair margin. After all, that will make things easier on my wallet (and on my sanity) when it’s time to replace the empty bottle!

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SiB BP (5)
Stagg 25B (5)
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.5)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.5)
Old Forester 1924 (5.5)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Green River Wheated (6)
Penelope Wheated (6)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.5)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.5)
Copper & Cask DO (6.5)
Blanton’s Gold (6.5)
Peerless Double Oaked (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)

7 | Great | Well above average
Weller 107 (7)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7)
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Willett 4yr Rye (7)
Old Forester 1910 (7.5)
Woodford Reserve DO (7.5)
Lasso Motel SiB Rye (7.5)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.5)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.5)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

Peerless is one of those brands that always catches my eye when I see it on a store shelf. On one hand, they have a distinctive bottle shape, and their whiskey always seems to be a wonderfully and impossibly dark shade of mahogany. On the other hand, with prices that frequently touch the triple digits, folks who haven’t tried it before may be left scratching their heads and trying to calculate just how much this whiskey could really be worth.

To that end, let’s dive into Peerless’s Double Oaked expression to see just how good it really is!

From the Distillery: Exposing Peerless Bourbon to two separate casks allows for two full barrel extractions. The result? Supercharged notes give this whiskey supreme complexity and mouthfeel. Our dedicated tasting team strategically selects barrels with prominent grain, fruit, and herbaceous notes as they are complemented well by the extra barrel character. This ultimately makes for a population of barrels that are packed with flavor, yet balanced enough to uphold the Peerless name.

Proof: 108.6

Age Statement: NAS

Price: $89.99

Filtration: Non-chill filtered

Appearance: The color is absolutely beautiful: it’s the impossibly dark, rich mahogany that’s a hallmark of Peerless whiskeys. Not terribly oily looking, but nice legs on the glass.

Nose: Ethanol up front, followed by caramel, vanilla, dark chocolate, and (unsurprisingly) a very prominent oakiness. Dark fruits are also there — black cherry and perhaps some stewed plum – along with a mesquite-ish, barbecue-ish note that I never would have picked up on had it not been mentioned in another review and comment thread. As it rests, some brighter flavors also surface, including cherry pie and graham cracker. Once the glass is empty, the remaining notes are primarily caramel, vanilla, and leather.

Palate: Relatively viscous and coating. There’s some astringency, but the primary influence up front is spice. Once you get past the initial kick, there are lots of densely-packed flavors to try to sort out and identify.

While caramel, vanilla, chocolate, and dark fruits carry over, the lighter and sweeter flavors that developed on the nose don’t really appear on the palate. Instead, it’s a dark, dense experience that really highlights the oak and tobacco above all, with fruits and (very mild) sweets relegated to a supporting role. It does drink a bit hot, as well.

Finish: Oak tannins, tobacco, and leather are joined by pepper, a little baking spice, and that strange barbecue note once again. There’s essentially no fruit or sweetness here, and it’s very drying.

Thoughts: This certainly isn’t Woodford Reserve Double Oaked! It’s also very different from other DO offerings like Pursuit United and Copper & Cask. Where I found those to be relatively sweet, savory, and hot (respectively), this Peerless expression might be best described as dark, dense, and dry. There are plenty of flavors here, but they’re packed so tightly into such a dense solution that it can be difficult to really pick them out and enjoy them for what they are!

To put it differently, this whiskey seems to me to be slightly less than the sum of its parts. That’s unfortunate, because those parts seem to be really, really good.

Rating: Overall, Peerless’s Double Oaked expression is a very good whiskey, but it hasn’t blown me away the way it has some other folks. For me, it’s a 6.5 on the modified T8ke scale – between "Very Good" and "Great." I do recommend it if you’re seeking a double oaked experience that’s darker, denser, and less sweet than some of the alternatives that are out there, but still very enjoyable.

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB Oloroso finish (4.5)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5)
Stagg 25B (5)
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.5)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.5)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Green River Wheated (6)
Penelope Wheated (6)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.5)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.5)
Copper & Cask DO (6.5)
Blanton’s Gold (6.5)
Peerless DO (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)

7 | Great | Well above average
Old Forester 1910 (7)
Weller 107 (7)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7)
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Willett 4yr Rye (7)
Woodford Reserve DO (7.5)
Lasso Motel SiB Rye (7.5)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.5)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.5)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

I’ve reviewed some other Penelope expressions, like their Four-Grain Wheated and Marshmallow Toast offerings. This is my first time encountering the Architect, though, and I’m very interested to see how it is.

This Architect was custom-built for Cumming Beverage Mart in north Georgia with a “complex” stave profile (as opposed to “delicate” or “intense”).

From the Producer: Architecture is defined as the art or practice of designing and constructing buildings. Using those same principles, we wanted to build new and distinct flavor profiles that same way an Architect creates new innovative structures. Working in collaboration with Tonnellerie Radoux of France, the market leader in oak barrel manufacturing and innovation, we use French oak staves and their state-of-the-art OakScan process to build a truly precise flavor profile within every bottle. After all, the best architecture leaves no room for error.

Mashbill: 75% Corn, 21% Rye, 4% Malted Barley

Private Build #: 23-1159

Stave Profile: Complex

Proof: 110

Price: $74.99

Appearance: Medium amber and slightly oily

Nose: Lots of spices, with anise and clove chief among them. There’s also dark caramel and something very floral, but not in a good way. Additionally, I’m getting a plasticky note, not unlike what I experienced with the Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat expression from Buffalo Trace. That part isn’t super enjoyable, and it combines with the spices to crowd out the rest of the scents. Once the glass is empty, what remains is primarily baking spice and burnt sugar.

Palate: That plasticky note carries over to the palate, where it’s almost overpowering. Most of what I get along with that is strong anise and clove spice, as well as an earthy note that I really don’t enjoy.

Finish: A little caramel-vanilla and whole lot of plastic and dirt. Based on the flavors involved, the finish is much too long.

Thoughts: This was not good. First off, I can say with certainty that I’m permanently swearing off picks from this particular store. The only one that’s come close to matching my palate, and therefore to being at all enjoyable, was their Pursuit United Double Oaked pick (reviewed here), which I don’t think they could mess up if they tried. This pour was really difficult to finish, and I don’t think I’ll be going back to it willingly at any point in the foreseeable future.

Rating: I’m not suggesting that Penelope’s whole architect line is bad, but this custom build sure was. It should consider itself lucky that I’m just giving it a 2.5 on the modified T8ke scale. Needless to say, I don’t recommend it at all.

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)
Penelope Architect custom build (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North Oloroso finish SiB (4.5)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Four Roses SBBP OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SiB BP (5)
Stagg 25B (5)
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.5)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.5)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Green River Wheated (6)
Penelope Wheated (6)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.5)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.5)
Copper & Cask DO (6.5)
Blanton’s Gold (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)

7 | Great | Well above average
Old Forester 1910 (7)
Weller 107 (7)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7)
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Willett 4yr Rye (7)
Woodford Reserve DO (7.5)
Lasso Motel SiB Rye (7.5)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.5)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.5)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

When Buffalo Trace released Eagle Rare 12-year in 2025, it sounded like the idea was for it to be at least as readily available as its little brother, Eagle Rare 10-year. That obviously hasn’t happened (yet, at least).

Of course, depending on where you live, Eagle Rare 10 might also not be very available, or very affordable. However, ER12 has for the most part remained unobtanium in the US since its release, which is unfortunate because it’s a pretty good pour and because it should frankly be a shelfer, just like the 10-year expression should be.

If you do somehow have the option to buy one or the other at MSRP, which should you get? Let’s blind them and find out how they are, both individually and in comparison to each other!

ABOUT Eagle Rare 10-year

*From the Distillery: Eagle Rare Aged 10 Years is a highly awarded expression aged for a full decade to achieve remarkable depth and balance. Crafted in small batches, it reflects patience, tradition and the artistry of American whiskey-making.

*Mashbill: Buffalo Trace Mashbill #1 (low rye)

*Proof: 90

*Price: MSRP $34.99 (but I’ve seen it close to $100 at some stores)

ABOUT Eagle Rare 12-year

*From the Distillery: Eagle Rare Aged 12 Years Bourbon Whiskey continues Eagle Rare’s endeavor to offer enthusiasts innovative new expressions on its journey to make the world’s best whiskey. Aged for a minimum of 12 years in a meticulously-monitored warehouse, this bourbon lives up to its name with its elevated, distinctive taste experience.

*Mashbill: Buffalo Trace Mashbill #1 (low rye)

*Proof: 95

*Price: MSRP $49.99 (but I’ve seen it close to $300 on secondary)

*******************

REVIEW: For the purpose of this blind, both bourbons have been poured into glencairns and rested for approximately 30 minutes.

Appearance A: Medium-dark amber. Decent legs on the glass.

Appearance B: Orangish-amber. Slightly runnier legs.

Nose A: Lots of grape – I mean, lots of grape. Luxardo cherry and other dark fruit. Blackberry pie filling with toasted crust. As it opens up more, I get notes of brown sugar, toffee, caramel, leather, and oak. Once the glass is empty, the primary notes are caramel, toffee, and leather.

Nose B: Lots of grape as well. Lighter and brighter overall, with notes of caramel, cherry pie filling, and vanilla buttercream frosting. Once the glass is empty, confectioner’s sugar and honey remain.

Palate A: Medium viscosity. Notes of blackberry crumble, grape, and oak (in that order) translate from nose to palate. More oak comes in at the end, but overall it’s a very nice and balanced sip.

Palate B: Lighter, slightly sweeter, and also ever so slightly more astringent. A very small amount of caramel, along with grape, cherry pie, and confectioner’s sugar.

Finish A: Medium-length and balanced, primarily featuring oak and grape. A nice touch of sweet honey offsets any bitterness.

Finish B: Slightly shorter and drier. Leather is the most prominent note, along with some barrel char and a bit of earthiness, along with the tiniest touch of caramel from the palate.

Rating A: 7.5 (between “Great” and “Excellent”)

Rating B: 6.5 (between “Very Good” and “Great”)

Thoughts: These are both very good bourbons. A is darker and more complex with a longer, more pleasant finish, while B features brighter flavors and a shorter, less-sweet finish. I’d happily drink both of these again, but the more enjoyable neat sipper is definitely A. On the other hand, B is also good neat, but I’d bet it would also make a really good Old Fashioned. That’s not a knock – I believe that just about any whiskey can be used as a mixer – but B isn’t quite up to the level of A when it comes down to the overall neat experience.

Prediction A: Eagle Rare 12

Prediction B: Eagle Rare 10

********************

Actual A: Eagle Rare 12

Actual B: Eagle Rare 10

More Thoughts: I can’t say I’m surprised by this – either the ratings, or the clear differences between ER10 and ER12. Predictably, the older of the two provides a slightly more mature experience, with darker notes and a more lasting finish, while not really seeming oakier than its younger brother. ER10, on the other hand, is lighter and brighter, with red fruits, sugar, and a shorter finish. Both also feature that classic Buffalo Trace grape, of course.

I really do enjoy Eagle Rare, and don’t think you can go wrong with either of these bottles. However, if you do find both for MSRP (good luck!), you’re not likely to be disappointed if you drop a few extra dollars to pick up the 12-year instead of the 10.

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.
Maker’s Mark staved private selection (2.5)

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.
Willett Pot Still (3)

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists
Found North SiB — Oloroso Finish (4.5)
Shortbarrel Sapsquatch (4.5)
Daniel Weller Emmer Wheat (4.5)

5 | Good | Good, just fine
Four Roses OESO (5)
New Riff 4yr SBBP (5)
Stagg 25B (5)
Jack Daniel’s SBBP Rye (5)
Jack Daniel’s Heritage (5)
1792 SiB BiB (5.5)
Blanton’s SiB (5.5)
Penelope Marshmallow Toast (5.5)

6 | Very Good | A cut above
Green River Wheated (6)
Penelope Wheated (6)
John J. Bowman SiB (6.5)
Copper & Cask DO (6.5)
Blanton’s Gold (6.5)
Barrell Cigar Blend (6.5)
Sazerac FP (6.5)
Eagle Rare 10yr (6.5)
Elmer T. Lee (6.5)

7 | Great | Well above average
Old Forester 1910 (7)
Weller 107 (7)
E.H. Taylor SmB (7)
Sagamore Rye 9yr (7)
Willett 4yr Rye (7)
EHT 2025 BTAC (7.5)
Woodford Reserve DO (7.5)
Lasso Motel SBBP Rye (7.5)
Old Fitzgerald 7yr (7.5)
Eagle Rare 12yr (7.5)

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional
Eagle Rare 17yr (8)
Blanton’s SFTB (8)
Thomas H. Handy 2025 (8.5)
Joseph Magnus Cigar Blend 420 (8.5)

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

Old Forester 1910 Old Fine Whisky is a member of the distillery’s Whiskey Row series, along with the 1897, 1920, and 1924 expressions. I’m a fan of double oaked bourbons, and this is one of the originals. Let’s see how it stacks up!

From the Distillery: Two Barrels. One Fine Bourbon. On October 22nd, 1910, a fire on the bottling line halted production of Old Forester. Mature whisky ready to be bottled, instead was stored in a secondary barrel. What emerged was a delightful whisky, remarkable enough to become an entirely new expression – Old Fine Whisky.

Today, mimicking this historic bottling, this unique expression of Old Forester has undergone a second barreling, granting it exceptional character, a smooth and sweet flavor and a clean, crisp finish. Entering the second barrel at a low 100 proof allows more of the sweet wood sugars to dissolve into the whiskey. 1910 Old Fine Whiskey is the fourth and final expression of the Whiskey Row Series, presented at 93 proof.

Tasting Notes: Interlaced layers of buttercream, sticky toffee, baked apple and a hint of roasted coffee beans. Smooth, well rounded mingling of sweet oatmeal raisin cookie leading into warm cinnamon spice, nutmeg and mocha. Viscous yet slightly dry with peripheral spice and smoky charred oak.

Proof: 93º

Mashbill: 72% corn, 18% rye, 10% malted barley

Age Statement: NAS

Price: $49.99

Appearance: Rich mahogany with surprisingly persistent legs on the glass.

Nose: Waffles with maple syrup right off the bat. Following this, I get rich caramel, dark chocolate, confectioners sugar, and sweet vanilla. A little ethanol but not much. There’s a touch of banana, which I’m not a fan of, but fortunately it’s much more in the background than in, say, most Jack Daniel’s expressions.

Palate: Some ethanol hits right away, but as it dissipates several flavors come to the forefront. There’s a good bit of oak, along with toffee and chocolate (like a Skor or Heath bar), brown sugar, maple, and some crispy – but not burnt! – pie crust. Rich caramel candy, like an old Sugar Daddy candy (remember those?), also makes an appearance. It may not be overly complex, but it’s nicely balanced, sweet, and flavorful.

Finish: Medium-length, featuring vanilla, caramel, barrel char, and leather. A bit smoky and somewhat drying. After a bit, everything fades away except for the caramel and vanilla, which is very nice.

Thoughts: This may be my favorite Old Forester bourbon (excluding Birthday, which I haven’t tried). I’ll probably blind this against the 1924 soon to see just how they stack up, but as it stands, while I like the 1924 just fine, this 1910 is just so solid and consistent. It can also be enjoyed in so many ways: neat, on the rocks, or even mixed in a delicious old fashioned (regular or chocolate).

I’m a fan of sweeter profiles, which is part of why I tend to gravitate toward Double Oaked and Toasted expressions, and this is an example of a really, really good one: it’s solid and consistent, and never really disappoints.

Rating: Old Forester’s 1910 Old Fine Whisky is absolutely crushable. For me, it rates a 7 on the T8ke scale: “Great – Well Above Average.”

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out.

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists.

5 | Good | Good, just fine.

6 | Very Good | A cut above.

7 | Great | Well above average

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional.

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect

Hey, look — it’s Blanton’s, but in a smaller bottle and with a gold horsey on top!

In seriousness, Blanton’s Gold is essentially billed as being Blanton’s Single Barrel (SiB) with 10 more proof points — 103º instead of 93º — for about twice the price. Is it worth that? While I can’t answer that question for you, I can provide an honest review of Blanton’s Gold that also offers a few comparisons with the standard expression, which I reviewed here. I’m also planning to blind the two in the near future, both for fun and for confirmation.

From the Distillery: Crafted for those who seek something rare, Blanton’s Gold Edition builds on the legacy of the world’s first single barrel bourbon with even greater intensity. Originally created for discerning international markets, this expression offers a higher proof and a deeper, spicier complexity that rewards the adventurous palate. A bold evolution of a bourbon icon.

Tasting notes: Hints of spicy rye and tobacco on the nose, followed by caramel and honey, dark fruit and citrus notes. The palate emulates the same complex aroma with rye, tobacco and honey. Oak and vanilla contribute to an extremely long and harmonious finish.

On the Bottle: We believe this is the finest bottle of whiskey ever produced, affording you extra flavor, bouquet and character.

Mashbill: Buffalo Trace mashbill #2 (high rye)

Rick: 20

Barrel: 805

Bottle: 204

Dumped On: 4-1-2025

Proof: 103°

Price: $169.99 for 700 mL (but I’ve seen it in stores for $300)

Appearance: Orangish-amber; relatively thin. A bit darker and with slightly longer legs on the glass than standard Blanton’s.

Nose: Sweet fruit up front. Dark fruit is also there, along with baking spice (especially cinnamon). There’s a little rye spice, but not too much. As the glass rests for a bit, the flavors seem to get darker. First, strong notes of caramel, vanilla, and maple syrup rise to the surface, where they combine with the rye spice to make for a nice overall combination. Next, chocolate and toffee come to the forefront, almost as if this whiskey is transforming into a Heath candy bar before my eyes (or, more correctly, before my nose). This definitely has a darker, more prominent, and more complex nose than Blanton’s SiB.

Palate: While regular Blanton’s was fairly thin and watery, there’s a touch more viscosity here, leading to more of a medium mouthfeel. Lots of vanilla up front, along with a little ethanol and a decent amount of rye spice. The sweet notes from the nose are mostly gone, with dark fruit, allspice, and tobacco replacing them. There’s a little caramel or honey, but it’s so far in the background I almost feel like I’m imagining it. Leather is there on the palate, as well, but the spices are the main notes. The flavors are definitely stronger here than in Blanton’s SiB, but they’re still not quite what I’d hoped or expected them to be.

Finish: Relatively oaky and drying. Rye spice is there, along with cinnamon or clove, followed by more oak and a little tobacco. After a while, some toffee and vanilla come back to the surface, allowing the finish to taper off with better overall flavor than it began with. The finish here is definitely longer than Blanton’s SiB, and while it’s more flavorful it’s also drier.

Thoughts: First off, there’s a definite difference between Blanton’s Gold and Blanton’s Single Barrel. The ten additional proof points have resulted in a bourbon that has more intense flavor, but it also has a dryer finish. Second of all – and probably most importantly to the reader – this isn’t worth twice the price of Blanton’s (and it’s certainly not worth the markup that I’ve seen in some stores).

I did enjoy Blanton’s Gold, both in comparison to Blanton’s SiB and on its own. That being said, it definitely could have been better if the flavor had been a bit more balanced and if the palate had better reflected the nose. Quite frankly, if you’re going to overpay for a Blanton’s expression, the thing to do is probably to drop a few more dollars and go with Blanton’s Straight from the Barrel. As I noted in my review of that bourbon, it has all the flavor and intensity that you could want, and you can proof it down as far as you’d like in order to make it more Blanton’s Gold or SiB-like, should you desire to do so.

Rating: Value-wise, I can’t recommend Blanton’s Gold to anybody at the price it’s going for. However, if you’re just considering the quality of the juice, it’s really good. For me  – again, not taking value or scarcity into account – this rates a 6.5 on the modified T8ke scale: it’s a little better than “Very Good,” but it doesn’t quite make it to “Great.”

1 | Disgusting | So bad I poured it out.

2 | Poor | I wouldn’t consume by choice.

3 | Bad | Multiple flaws.

4 | Sub-par | Not bad, but better exists.

5 | Good | Good, just fine.

6 | Very Good | A cut above.

7 | Great | Well above average

8 | Excellent | Really quite exceptional.

9 | Incredible | An all time favorite

10 | Perfect | Perfect