u/AromaticAd9701

Image 2 — Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4 8-element that was sold as “Near Mint / No Fungus.”
Image 3 — Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4 8-element that was sold as “Near Mint / No Fungus.”
▲ 1 r/Cameras+1 crossposts

Super Takumar 50mm f/1.4 8-element that was sold as “Near Mint / No Fungus.”

Externally the lens is honestly beautiful and mechanics feel excellent. Focus and aperture are smooth. But under strong flashlight inspection I found:

- normal internal dust

- some coating/cleaning marks

- slight haze maybe

- and this small white branching/web-like patch near the edge of one internal element

I attached macro photos.

I’m trying to determine:

- active fungus?

- old fungus residue?

- balsam separation?

- coating damage?

- normal vintage wear?

Important:

This is ONLY really visible under intense flashlight + macro phone camera angles. Barely noticeable otherwise.

I know flashlight tests can massively exaggerate defects in vintage lenses, so I’d love opinions from experienced Takumar/vintage lens users.

Main questions:

  1. What do you think this actually is?

  2. Would you keep or return at around $286?

  3. Is this likely to noticeably affect image quality/video contrast?

  4. Does this look stable/inactive or potentially growing?

Thanks.

u/AromaticAd9701 — 21 hours ago