
Would we still want Hermes if buying one no longer made us feel special?
Imagine waking up tomorrow and discovering that every Hermes bag we have been dreaming about is readily available, in every color, size, and leather, with no waiting, no uncertainty, and no feeling that we have secured something difficult to obtain.
Would the excitement remain the same?
Part of what makes collecting Hermes so fascinating is the combination of design, craftsmanship, heritage, and the experience of pursuing a particular piece. A Birkin in a carefully chosen leather or a Kelly in the perfect shade can hold genuine personal meaning, regardless of how easy or difficult it was to acquire.
But scarcity can change the way we value things. When a bag is difficult to obtain, we may think about it more, follow every update, compare combinations obsessively, and feel a particular satisfaction when we finally get it. The effort becomes part of the story we tell ourselves about the purchase.
Now imagine that the same bag becomes ordinary overnight. Nobody is impressed by it, nobody asks about it, and owning one says nothing about how long we waited or what it took to get it. We would still have the leather, the construction, the design, and the bag itself, but the surrounding experience would be completely different.
Some collectors would probably feel relieved because they could focus on exactly what they love. Others might discover that the chase, the exclusivity, or the recognition was a much bigger part of the attraction than they realized.
Neither answer automatically makes someone a less genuine collector, but it does raise an uncomfortable question about how desire works in luxury fashion.
If every Hermes bag suddenly became easy to buy and nobody cared who owned one, would our dream bag still be our dream bag, or would we start wanting something else?