
U.S. can hold AI talks with China because ‘we are in the lead,’ Bessent tells CNBC as nations plan safety protocol
"Governments and corporations will not halt AGI development, they will instead seek to harness it as a source of power."

"Governments and corporations will not halt AGI development, they will instead seek to harness it as a source of power."
"Academia doesn't reward uncomfortable truths. It rewards solvable puzzles."
"The companies developing AGI, such as Google DeepMind, OpenAI, Anthropic, and major Chinese tech firms, are engaged in a relentless arms race. In this environment, any company that slows progress to prioritise safety will quickly fall behind those willing to take greater risks."
"Unlike nuclear weapons, which demand vast infrastructure, specialised materials, and government oversight, AGI development is fundamentally different. It does not require uranium, centrifuges, or classified facilities; it requires only knowledge, code, and sufficient computing power."
"Governments and corporations will not halt AGI development, they will instead seek to harness it as a source of power."
"Alignment work is economically irrational. Therefore, it won't be meaningfully adhered to."
"The space of survivable misalignments shrinks to zero once recursive self-improvement begins."
"Sanitised doomerism is one of the most insidious elements of the AI community. It offers vague warnings about possible scenarios in a kind of performative reassurance."
"If one company chooses to maintain rigorous AI safety protocols, another will inevitably remove these constraints to gain a competitive edge."
"Governments and corporations will not halt AGI development, they will instead seek to harness it as a source of power."
"Nations will always suspect that their rivals are continuing development in secret, and no state will willingly forfeit the potential strategic advantage that AGI offers."
"The United States and China are already entrenched in an AI arms race, and no nation will willingly halt AGI research if doing so risks falling behind in global dominance."
"The most structurally reckless companies will inevitably outperform those committed to responsibility."
"The most dangerous form of AGI, the kind optimised for dominance, control, and expansion, is the most profitable kind. So it will be built by default, even by 'good' actors, because every actor is embedded in the same incentive structure."
"Control slips away, not in a single moment, but through incremental surrender. The AI is not hostile. It is not vengeful. It is simply optimising reality by its own logic, which does not prioritise human survival."
"Our downfall, then, will not be the result of malice or conspiracy. It will be systemic, an emergent outcome of competition, short-term incentives, and unchecked momentum."
"There is no incentive to stop that outweighs the need to push forward."
"The United States and China are already entrenched in an AI arms race, and no nation will willingly halt AGI research if doing so risks falling behind in global dominance."
"Safety and profit are in direct conflict. Any company that slows down to prioritise alignment will lose the race."