u/Bagline

5.26g No mint mark
These photos are comparing a (suspected) 1953 henning to a 1952 genuine. To my eyes side by side, the 53 head actually looks slightly larger likely due to the fuzzy edges around the cameo.

You can see mushy details in the lettering and forehead on the obverse. (just the better shots I got to illustrate)

Mushy details on the lettering and building on the reverse.

Some sort of marks left under his chin.

What do you guys think?

edit: I know, I know... No looped R, but as I understand not all have it.