u/Beneficial_Garage387

https://preview.redd.it/ots3cdc5vb1h1.png?width=275&format=png&auto=webp&s=d0554370a92b44fb52db811559d612323660dbbf

oh my days bro, i didn't think they would come out today, but it turns out i was wrong.

https://preview.redd.it/6smz70x3pk0h1.png?width=1423&format=png&auto=webp&s=da4f0eceee6c0226119cd5ef9b93387909ca0070

Last time it said something like "this service cannot eb requested" or something

basically the title titletitletitletitletitletitletitle

After the course that MAT137 was, I really feel like studying or at least familiarizing myself with what'll come next in MAT235, don't really feel that mat237 is really worth it for my goals.

For those that took the course, how did you do? What are things that you would say I should be mindful of next year and study or know in advance?

Are there any resources you would recommend that I should study or look at in order to better prepare for this course?

So I was planning for my second year and i noticed on ttb that mat235 is now a half credit course with vector calculus I and mat236 as another half credit course called vector calculus II.

since quercus is down, dosa anyone by chance have links to the lecture recordings for today if they watched them.

the term test is quite close, we’ll, there’s still a week and more but still.

So I heard that the courses or at least one of them went through a change in the content they covered, is that actually the case?

For 2025-2026 did they follow the course notes for the courses that are published on the internet, aka these ones https://www.teach.cs.toronto.edu/~csc165h/winter/csc165-lecture-notes.pdf

https://www.teach.cs.toronto.edu/~csc148h/notes/

And would you say that the content from previous year classes like 2024/2025, is the same as the content that was taught and tested in 2025/2026?

Basically the title and also is the first tutorial next week.

I just enrolled in the course cuz there was one spot left.

For context, I barely have any knowledge in biology.

Are these courses very subjective when it comes to marking, I am assuming for cog250 it is but is it that bad?

Would you say that one could take these two get high marks if they're in cs and math right now?

Basically the title, charcharcharcharcharcharcharcharchar

So i messed up quite badly this semester, i honestly felt bad for not being able to fit in and have a good start to a social life at uni. It kinda made me withdrawn from doing work and negatively impacted my work which I realize now like I just didn't enjoy going anymore cuz I would always sit by myself cuz I sucked at making friends and stuff which is so insanely cringe and horrible to say but it is true and i have to accept it.

I know now that there is nothing that I can do about this and regret won't help but I don't know whether it is a great idea of doing csc148 and 165 and a sup app for a cs major.

Would people say it is easier to do 148 and 165 after doing 110 and 111.

Also how was the supp app this year and what was it like?

I want to go into quantum comp and ai and am thinking of a masters in quantum comp or ai through applied science.

Will it work out if I do a cs minor and majors in math and physics or would it be worth trying for the major again?

It feels horrible bro like it feels like I'm so much dumber and horrible then my friends and others who made it and here I am not being able to make it.

Like I genuinely worked hard in high school for this and people who care about me worked so hard too, messing up one course cuz of me not being as good as others has costed me what I worked for.

Atp i don't get why cs post even exists and these mark requirements exist when we already get filtered out when we're admitted into the cs program like no other uni does this??

Why make life harder for people?