Fill in a pool or wait for a house with no pool.
I am pulling my hair out in frustration over the market right now. We're looking in south Florida, and we are pretty firm on no pool, no HOA. The no HOA limits the the search quite a bit, but every flippin' house has a pool. I don't want to have a pool, I don't want to maintain a pool, I don't want to worry about my kids/nephews/neighbors falling in the pool and drowning when i'm not looking. On top of that, I really don't want to maintain a 30+year old pool. I do not want to pay for the dumb financial decisions of previous homeowners.
In one neighborhood we really like, on google earth I counted 20 houses with no pool in a neighborhood of about 300 houses. Even if we opened the search to HOAs, it's pretty limited. I guess moral of the story, being a pool guy is good job security.
At this point I'm weighing the options - what if we bought a nice house with a typical pool, and just had it filled in. I know a filled in pool is on the property disclosure down here, but it's my understanding as long as it's done right there is nothing preventing someone from putting one in in the future. I know I'll "take a hit" on home value vs a house with a pool, but over 10 years I'm sure I'll make up for it by not needing maintenance, even including cost of filling it in. I guess the crux of the question is having a filled in pool on the property the black mark I fear it is? Should we just hold out and wait for a no pool house to show up, or - fill in a pool at an otherwise nice house?