Should every mid & high major (non one-bid) league use dynamic/flex scheduling to maximize bids/seeding?
In the age of super conferences this seems to make more and more sense to me. The downside would be that a team with a slow start could be essentially eliminated from tourney contention early-ish.
For those unfamiliar with the concept, dynamic scheduling in conference play involves adjusting the final portion of the regular season conferece schedule based on team performance and/or standings.
For example, the 14 member A10 may have every team play each other conference member once (13 games) and then split the conference into 2 groups based on standings (1-7, 8-14) for the final 7 games of the season.
Conferences would have to switch up how they do seeding for their conference tournaments as well (based on NET, kenpom, or similar perhaps).
In an age where the BIg East had 3 bids last year and 2024, the A10 regularly gets 1-2 bids out of 15 teams (down to 14 this year), and the ACC got 4 bids out of 18 teams in 2025 it seems like something has to be done. Would you be for or against for your favorite mid or high major conference?