u/BlusLoopedMirror

I’m an independent researcher in Cairo working on CPU-first numerical simulation and reproducible solver evidence.

I recently released a bounded solver-evidence paper and SHA-256 locked artifact packet:

Audited Laptop-Scale 512³ Quantum-State Simulation: A REPA-Governed Solver Stack Beyond the Cluster-Only Assumption

DOI: https://zenodo.org/records/20247942

The claim is narrow:

• 512³ internal-state complex split-step simulation using a oneAPI CPU backend on an Intel i7 laptop-class machine
• persisted outputs are 2D amplitude/phase slice planes, not full 512³ volume dumps
• separate Crank–Nicolson Hermitian conservation validation
• separate GMRES/multigrid comparison against a PARDISO direct-solve oracle at calibration scale
• dimension-tagged evidence matrix to prevent merging solver lanes

What I am not claiming:

• not 512³ Crank–Nicolson execution
• not 512³ GMRES/PARDISO parity
• not cluster obsolescence in general
• not proof of any AI/identity theory attached to the broader research program

I’m looking for hostile technical review: numerical issues, memory-accounting mistakes, evidence-boundary problems, reproduction suggestions, or places where the public claim should be narrowed.

Paper/evidence packet:
https://zenodo.org/records/20247942GitHub:
https://github.com/ChasingBlu/RECP_evidence