That victor Marx interview was SO bad that the trolls have FINALLY shut the f*ck up for a day 😂😂😂😂😂
That's an impressive feat, Victor. You bombed so fantastically that they don't even have a crumb of info to twist in their favor! Not a single talking point to rally behind. Cat (head) got your tongue, guys?
You want to make Candace look stupid? You want to hurt her case and help your reputation? Want to damage her credibility/public trust?
Then release the video of Charlie appointing Erika as CEO. If there really is a video, and it's real, it would certainly be a blow to her investigation, right? Then release it! It can only help your case!
There is an X troll named "Britta" aka @ nosoup4knowles. She is a massively irritating self described daily wire superfan who just shitposts all day. She's one of the more vocal trolls that now posts about candace a few times per hour. Oh well who cares.
Well, she uses an avatar as a profile photo and Ian Carroll and Evan Kilgore on X posted face photos of her and boy were they BRUTAL. I don't normally comment on peoples' appearances, but let's just say it makes sense that she's hiding behind avatars. I'm so mad I didn't screenshot the photos. But after she got exposed, she was tweeting at Ian to DM her. All the pics of her real face were deleted and I am so curious as to what happened behind the scenes lol.
Did anyone else see this? I thought it was hilarious and I don't know why Evan specifically would do her a solid and delete them all after she clearly crashed out getting her ugly mug posted online lol
Amping up the CharlieGPT pressure & Baron proving Tyler was in custody before the discord message was sent is really angering the shills today.
I shouldn't give the shills any attention, but I just have to rant about them really quickly. I have NEVER seen anything like this. Hundreds of accounts dedicated to watching every episode, posting about Candace multiple times an hour, every day, for months on end. It is absolutely insane.
Even generic hate/spam accounts for celebrities don't have this level of hate-fueled obsession. It's entirely on another level.
Of course, they're going to say "well Candace has been dedicating every day to scrutinizing Erika and everyone at TPUSA!" But it's not even a comparable analogy. She's dedicated the last 6 months to her INVESTIGATION. Not any person in particular. Candace, and everyone watching candace and/or aiding in the investigation: Their focus is the investigation. These shills entire focus is Candace. It. Is. Weird.
I can't even remotely understand how people wouldn't see this as strange. You have everyone from the lowest of the low like paramount tactical all the way up to the president trying to convince you simply performing an investigation is equivalent to being a satanic demon who requires all hands on deck to destroy.
Anyway, it's all for nothing. It's failing miserably. I just had to rant because I really can't believe we're in this place as a society where so many people are willing to take money to devote their lives to trying to take down the best of us, and defend the worst of us. The ones who sell their souls don't get to win.
Just found out the girl that the daily wire hired to host the 'in the know know' show making fun of candace was a part of the company layoffs. just wanted to share
I truly don't mean any of this in a mean way, but just based on observations I am SO lost on what Blake's role is in all of this.
Blake reminds me a lot of Stephen Miller, both in personality and circumstance. Personality being, he seems very deeply angry and tries to come off as a serious player, but just exudes insecure incel. Circumstance being, he got his place at the table, but basically everyone around him hates him. They tolerate him for the times he can be useful, so they keep him around.
Blake seems like the type that they keep on the 'outs'. The guy they have a separate group chat without, the guy not 'in' on the plans, and honestly like someone who would've been bullied in high school by the Andrew Kolvet types.
So how did he get to be co-anchor of the Charlie Kirk show 2.0? Why do they send HIM of all people out as their attack dog to comment on Candace's claims? Do they really think anyone would listen to, or be intimidated by him?! And why do they keep letting him write these moronic, failures of speeches and statements that continually make TPUSA look worse?
I truly think he is someone that they'd keep OUT of any assassination plot. So it's so interesting to me that he seems to take any attack on Erika so personally, and is willing to make himself look a fool going up against Candace. He also has to know the speeches he's writing are having the opposite effect.
So what is the point of keeping this loser around. He embarrasses himself with these emotional crash outs, he is weak and insecure, and he can't do his job effectively. So what is his deal?! He just seems like such a random outlier to me
https://www.scribd.com/document/1033356326/D-E-1-Brian-Harpole-v-Candace-Owens
https://x.com/MSarelson/status/2049903824538652838?s=20
And Mitch Snow. Oh boy. Come on discovery!
In the grand scheme of all she is and does and says, this is near the bottom in the list of importance-but it really stuck out to me yesterday in her weird sniper video how disgusted she was by the idea of everyone coming together at the white house correspondents dinner. The way she scowled recounting the daily mail journalist say "It's special that we can put aside our differences for a night right?"
Like, historically the WHCD is all about putting aside differences, coming together- they usually hire a comedian specifically to roast the president to show that he can laugh at himself. Of course Trump cannot laugh at himself so he nixed the comedian this time, but the whole point is to bring some levity and community amongst the press corps and honestly make the president look good, unifying, and yada yada.
Reading between the lines, she went for either a photo op, or honestly...probably to intimidate journalists. I mean, it's insane to me that the press really isn't covering this investigation. But the reality is, they're not. So why bark at them? About conspiracies? The MSM isn't smearing her whatsoever. Idk. Just weird and misplaced to blame them. So what was the real reason?
So besides it being strange in general that she was there, since Charlie had never even been before (and she really had no business being there), she went to an event about bringing everyone together and was....repulsed that that was the case? It also goes to show that her goal is NOT unity. She's disgusted by the idea of setting aside differences and coming together. WTF is that about Ms. Ultra Christian.
Anyway. I'm very interested to see if anything comes from that journalist about being sent the video of Erika "crying" or if it was taken in real time.
Thanks for listening to my brain dump!
Word on the street is Erika Kirk is planning to resign tomorrow on the Charlie Kirk show. Rumblings that Andrew Kolvet will take over......