u/BuildMoreBetter

Looking for 3 AI-native solo/duo builders who are stuck choosing what to test next

I am trying to talk to 3 solo/duo builders who can build fast with AI, but are not sure which project deserves more time.

Not looking for polished launches. More interested in the messy middle: too many ideas, some product work, a few replies or signups, but not enough real-world signal to know what to keep building.

If that is you, reply with:

1. What are you building?

2. Who is the first real user you are trying to reach?

3. What have you tried so far to reach them?

4. What response would make you keep going?

5. What response would make you change direction or stop?

Quick clarification: I am not trying to extract free research from people here.

If you reply with those five answers, I’ll give you a useful async pass back: who I’d narrow your first user to, where I’d try to find them first, and what small test I’d run next.

I am building around this same problem, but this is not a launch post and I am not dropping a link. I want to learn how builders actually decide with evidence instead of vibes, and hopefully give a few people a useful next move while I do it.

I am building a SaaS for AI-native solo/duo builders. I won't link to it because I am not trying to make this a drive-by promo.

I am trying to figure out which description makes the product easiest to understand, I've got 5 right now:

A. BMB is the project home for AI-native builders. Every idea lives in one place, ranked by real evidence, with the next move always clear.

B. BMB keeps builders from wasting months on the wrong thing by turning ideas, feedback, and reach attempts into a ranked project record with a clear next move.

C. BMB is Linear for indie projects, but every project has an evidence-based ranking, a next move, and a kill condition.

D. Cursor remembers your code. BMB remembers why the project is worth building, what real people said, and what should happen next.

E. BMB helps builders earn the right to go public: get private feedback first, capture real response, then take the strongest project where it deserves to land.

My questions:

Which one makes the product clearest?
Which one feels most valuable?
Which one feels too vague, too much, or too buzzwordy?
And if none of them land, what did you think the product was supposed to do?

Thanks all so much, I will take in any and all feedback that your are gracious enough to offer!

------

With the primary request out of the way, if you've read this far, here is more context about what I'm actually doing/solving:

AI makes it easier than ever to keep building, but it does not tell you whether the project deserves more time, who to test with next, or what the signal you got actually means. So you end up with five half-finished projects, a Notion full of feedback you cannot act on, and no idea which one is strongest.

The product keeps every project organized in one place, ranks them by real evidence, helps find the first people to test with, captures what they said, and tells you what to do next at every stage. Basically, you bring everything you do out in the real world back here to stay organized. It does help with validation, but also helps you get feedback from humans, helps with outreach and promo, and it tells you objectively when you have better ideas and that it's time to move on from this one.