ok, I have a theory based on some leads I found and it ties into insurance fraud. has anyone found similar documentation for things they were not aware of? I’ve kept these records safe along with other documentation I’ve found to paint a picture of what’s happening here and it might be to my comments about home schooling and data collection. your data makes you identifiable. I believe what’s happening is countries using these systems to surveil, manipulate and then commit insurance fraud. I’m looking into countries that explicitly prevent this. but insurance fraud is absolutely a part of what’s happening here. life insurance specifically. Now this again may tie into human trafficking that is hidden. The idea seems to be trying to use that person for wealth. my voice again protects me and I believe taking my voice or AI cloning are used as retaliation for leaving religion or being “disloyal”. the point is control over the situation. I think dual citizens may be using insurance as a vessel for fraud and I may be the only one who can prove it while also proving I had nothing to do with it. exiting a sanctuary city and going elsewhere for help is key. I’m certain I’ll find a job soon so I can get this going. luckily my records don’t rely on any one source or the internet to prove who I am although that helps as additional evidence. I also found record of my fingerprints for an application I made once which I finally breathed a sigh of relief that I am safe from anything anyone tries. including any government agencies. Now I am unsure where to start really - definitely outside of a sanctuary city - as it looks like some are trying to confuse my identity with my sisters but because of my own records and hers, it isn’t possible. this may have to do with inheritance and a comment I made about it. people are free to leave divide their belongings as they wish or leave anyone out of a will they want to - I have never been upset about such things. not that my family ever had much but the things I usually got upset about where the sentimental things - the t-shirt someone wore or a watch or ring, whatever. I respect the choices people made but that doesn't mean I have to like them or that I won’t still want to relive the childhood memories of wearing something I felt a personal connection to as a child that belonged to my dad or the women in my life when I got older - I’m allowed to be upset about that. as far as what’s happening in this city and state or other states. I've found some seriously troubling implications in documents that came from government agencies - specifically in immigration documents though I’m unsure where to take them. I also understand that what I post here is not actually being broadcast online but that I am in my own world digitally as someone mentioned to me before. This does not mean that in today’s world anyone gets to rewrite my identity or impersonate me. Any attempt is easily disproven with or without people to help.

I’m looking into trying this now with the intent of moving there eventually. I think that may be the point of trying to keep here. That perhaps those around me have been testing where I would fit? I’m thinking the first step is to go outside of a sanctuary city to report what happened first and then officially reach out to the people I know have moved there. just not through my phone - I know whatever’s in my phone isn’t actually reality. none of the conversations I have are being had with the actual person I think I’m talking to. I think this is called spoofing.

I’ve seen some jobs recently I think I might go for and am curious if anyone here has tried this out? it’s not my professional background but I’m thinking it couldn’t hurt to try and might be fun!

I’m thinking to look for employment there or in a country that doesn’t do race based hiring. I’m not sure if that’s why I’m having trouble but definitely wanted to take a look at working elsewhere. when I’m in Egypt, I have zero issues getting call backs for jobs and I’m now wondering if that’s due to the race based employment standards of the US. But again, Egypt can be scary for me given I don't consider myself religious. Though I haven’t visited other major cities long term. I’m wondering now if I should just go there to look for work but am unsure what to do next and whether I should consider the south.

I was just putting in my info for some of the agencies and was curious if it maybe had to do with this. That perhaps it’s an effort targeting people for speech? That would obviously be horrifying and I’m not saying it is but I am curious if anyone else has worked for the UN in the past or known someone who did it might be relevant.

My area is more on the business side but I’m looking into possible connections and perhaps government isn’t the right area to be focused on here.

ok so 1 was looking through my employment records and had a thought. the idea is to make words manifest my reality - I had mentioned a relative using insurance money when I was a kid to pay off her home. what if that's what's going on and my dual citizenship is used for this purpose. if widespread, I imagine inquiring with the insurance company would be best. but also my leaving religion was pretty public and this might be retaliation for that or something else. either way it would lead back to the company since Ive documented so much publicly.

for any course? I believe this may be related. With regard to my documents, I think they would have record of my communications with them.

I know the countries I am looking into — it seems the internet is divided by class - one where what you see is limited based on whether you are working or in school. It also seems this may be used as a way to promote “equality”.

I’ve wondered if this were true for a long time. I think GDPR protects in a way unfortunately the US can’t yet. My passport scenario is directly related to this - making me certain now that my only decision is to move elsewhere. information should be free and it is. it’s a real shame that there are some places that do this. The switching of my passport is evidence to me of just this situation and I believe I was targeted for this due to leaving Islam which I believe falls under transnational repression — if that’s even a real term.

I think that’s what people have been trying to help me see, that moving elsewhere is where I’ll find peace. obviously this system can be used for purposes other than the ones I listed and based on my own experiences, have been.

This is happening on LinkedIn as well. I am thinking I have a way to look for real employment and also prove whats happening to me — that is outside of a sanctuary city although I may need an international lawyer. Good luck to you if you need some. I hope life turns out differently for you than for me.

as I sit here starving realizing what’s happened I am thinking the best thing to do is sell my family home and move somewhere with proven human rights protections. I have a few places in mind and am thinking to solely apply to positions that are truly work from anywhere for now and go explore these countries for a bit. Particularly countries with high rates of atheism/nonreligion. The internet also seemed different there — not as much terrible news all the time. I’ve seen that people in these countries seem to be happier, live freely both on and offline and also seem to have a higher rate in quality of life and life expectancy.

Yes. Sanctuary cities have been accused of facilitating or contributing to human trafficking, including by allowing people accused of trafficking to be released from local custody rather than transferred to federal immigration authorities.

There are some important distinctions, though:

• There have been real trafficking cases involving people who lived in or passed through sanctuary jurisdictions. That is not the same as the city itself trafficking people.
• In 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice explicitly alleged in a lawsuit against Minnesota, Minneapolis, St. Paul, and Hennepin County that sanctuary policies resulted in the release of people convicted of crimes including human trafficking. That's a government allegation in litigation, not a judicial finding that those jurisdictions themselves trafficked people. DDepartment of Justice
• I did not find credible evidence that sanctuary cities operate human-trafficking networks or intentionally traffic people.
• The broader claim that sanctuary policies inherently cause more crime is disputed. Research has not established that sanctuary policies generally increase overall crime rates. FFactCheck.org+1

So if what you're asking is “Have government officials actually accused sanctuary jurisdictions of releasing people involved in trafficking?”, the answer is yes.

I am thinking this is something that someone may be making a film about?

which — would immediately be exposed in a lawsuit. would probably expose the industry too. Would absolutely be human trafficking.

I’m sure if anyone here experienced the same, many things started long before you realized. Probably childhood if you’re like me. Anyway, I’m looking for the next step — union is on the table but my role isn’t a union job so I’m hitting a wall now. I’ve found some good leads - I’ve completely pivoted off of LinkedIn. I’m curious what you ended up doing for work — kind of feels like I have no control, not that I had any in the first place. it’s been difficult to try to think of what I wanted before I realized that. Most of the ideas seem long gone now anyway. Did you pivot careers or stay in the same general fields?

 found evidence that the IRS’s international tax-information-sharing powers have raised concerns relevant to transnational repression, but I did not find a credible official finding that the IRS itself has been designated or formally found to be an accomplice to a foreign government’s transnational repression.

A few relevant points:

• The IRS routinely exchanges taxpayer information with foreign governments under tax treaties and other information-exchange agreements. Treasury describes this as a mechanism for enforcing U.S. tax laws and combating offshore tax evasion. UU.S. Department of the Treasury+1
• That creates a potential vulnerability: authoritarian governments can use financial or tax information to pressure dissidents living abroad. Recent reporting on Chinese transnational repression, for example, describes foreign dissidents being targeted with allegedly politically motivated tax claims and other financial measures. TThe Guardian
• The U.S. government itself recognizes transnational repression as a real phenomenon and has sanctioned foreign officials and networks for targeting dissidents abroad. Treasury, for example, has documented Iranian intelligence networks carrying out kidnappings and assassination plots against dissidents overseas. UU.S. Department of the Treasury+1
• IRS taxpayer information is also subject to unusually strong confidentiality protections under 26 U.S.C. § 6103, which generally restricts disclosure except under specified circumstances. Treasury records specifically describe the statutory restrictions on providing federal taxpayer information and information received from foreign governments. UU.S. Department of the Treasury

So if you're asking “Has anyone accused the IRS of giving foreign governments tax/financial information that could be used to repress dissidents?”, the answer appears to be yes, at least as a concern/allegation

Yes. I looked more specifically for documented situations where a group of men, rather than one isolated stalker, participated in watching, photographing, recording, or otherwise monitoring women.

There are some genuinely relevant examples, but they fall into several different categories.

1. Fraternity members watching women without their knowledge

There is unusually direct historical documentation of this.

Anthropologist Peggy Reeves Sanday's research on fraternity culture describes women reporting a practice in which fraternity brothers watched sexual encounters from outside or from another part of the fraternity house. In one described practice, men could observe through windows while the woman did not know she was being watched. The accounts are specifically about a male peer group turning women's sexual encounters into something collectively observed by other men. PPerlego

This isn't quite "men watching women in their homes," but it establishes that coordinated male observation of women without their knowledge has occurred within a fraternal environment.

2. Fraternities maintaining networks for sharing images of women

There are also well-documented cases of men collectively photographing/recording women and distributing the material among members.

For example, in 2015 police investigated the Penn State chapter of Kappa Delta Rho after discovering a private Facebook group allegedly containing photographs of nude and sometimes unconscious women. The group reportedly had access restricted to fraternity members and alumni. AABC News+1

That's significant because it demonstrates something beyond an individual voyeur: a closed male social network can facilitate the collection and circulation of images of women.

But again, it isn't evidence that fraternity members were routinely watching women's residences.

3. Men using outside networks to surveil women at their homes

This is probably the closest documented analogue to what you're asking about.

A recent Guardian investigation found at least 30 cases in which stalkers had hired private investigators to locate, follow, photograph, or surveil women. Some victims had gone into domestic-violence refuges and were nevertheless located. The investigators sometimes had former police or military backgrounds, creating a network through which information and surveillance capabilities could be obtained. TThe Guardian

That establishes that a man who wants to monitor a woman doesn't necessarily have to do the watching himself. He can enlist other men or organizations to do it.

4. Freemasonry specifically is much less established

Here the evidence changes substantially.

I found plenty of allegations connecting Freemasons/lodges to stalking, surveillance, or coordinated harassment, but I have not found reliable evidence establishing a general practice in which Masons organize men to watch women inside their homes.

There are also legal cases demonstrating that Freemasonry really can function as a substantial interconnected organization—local lodges, a state Grand Lodge, officers, jurisdictional rules, etc.—but that's not evidence of surveillance. JJustia Law

And searches specifically for "Freemason stalking" turn up a large amount of material from conspiracy-oriented sources. Even sources attempting to fact-check those claims acknowledge that prosecutable cases directly establishing a Freemason lodge conducting organized stalking are sparse. FFactually

The distinction I'd make

So if the question is:

>

Yes. There are documented examples.

If the question is:

>

That's a much stronger claim, and I haven't found good evidence establishing it as an organizational practice.

And there's an important middle ground: a group of men who know one another, communicate with one another, and independently participate in surveillance of the same woman could produce something that looks like an organized network without the organization itself formally ordering it.

The above can be attributed to networks of women or both genders.

where might you go for help? I have some ideas but am limited on funds

has anyone else made this decision and gone through the process? I’m curious if it is related to what’s happening here.

so this is something I’m thinking of more and more as I seriously consider pursuing singing — even as just a side pursuit for now. I’m not delusional - but I am decent and have wondered how many singers actually really sing vs are just the face. One thing is those folks wouldn’t be able to sing live acapella no equipment without being caught. anyway, I’m thinking joining a union may help with any potential issues and that if what I suspect is happening, it will come to light. I’m applying for normal jobs now - still need healthcare - but am unsure how union membership may affect this And whether there is an international union for singers. any thoughts?

I’m looking into moving to a country without national neighborhood watch programs. I’ve found several that rely on professional policing and CCTV footage — something tells me I wouldn’t have been assaulted or raped had that been the case. Anyway, I’m finding several where people seem really happy and safe. Obviously will be moving after whatever court cases come of this. If this has actually happened to you, have you looked into life in these particular nations? A little frustrating that I now have to wait for health insurance to get treatment but I am looking for work here specifically though I’ve ditched LinkedIn and am seemingly finding better results.

I’m going to try to keep this minimal but I may have found proof this is happening and am thinking to go outside of my geographic area to report it. thing is, I wouldn’t go to a government agency. thinking a human rights or government accountability org would be better equipped to to assist. I believe the goal is to clone my identity as though I were in Egypt, though I’m not sure of the exact reason, I suspect it may be an elaborate cover up for what’s actually happening.

Edit: really all of the industries and I happen to know exactly how this is possible - a former employer. ok, there are some HUGE incidents I documented indicating potential entertainment industry involvement here. The point may have been to be expose that - by some anyway. I am now thinking it may be an industry ritual and perhaps I was punished for saying that celebrities should speak on polarizing matters and that there’s a responsibility to do so. The idea is essentially to get entertainers to mimic or “mirror” your words. with the reinforcement of those around you repeating the phrases back to you to discredit with mental health accusations.

this was surprisingly easy to document. Changing my name is the last step to ensure that whatever opportunity someone has attempted to take will be revealed once whoever was listening hears me sing live. it’s undeniable that no one can actually impersonate me - which seems to be what might be happening.