






Opponent Data from Gemini 2 CM14 Open League
I tracked the data of my opponents in Gemini, there are different graphs for rounds 1 and 2, and I also included Round 2 of Taurus for comparison. I'm doing this to gauge the strength of the league after its recent change to A+ and below.
First data point is the rating of the opponent horses, Round 2 results are similar for Taurus and Gemini but in Round 1, Gemini had about 15% more above 13500 rating. What this tells me is that overall people are getting more comfortable running Trackblazer and getting the stats and skills they want.
Next is Distance Aptitude and I thought it was a fluke that in Taurus round 2 horses had Distance S less often than in round 1 but it happened again in Gemini. I did notice a good number of horses that were not great but still had Distance S in round 1 so what might be happening is that casual trainers are overvaluing Distance S while more experienced trainers are more focused on stats and skills.
Next is the track-specific bonus of extra speed for hitting thresholds of Stamina and Guts. I didn't track Stamina since I assumed everyone would be going for 601 anyway, but 601 Guts is not something casual trainers would stumble on by accident so I thought that was a decent stat to track as a knowledge check. In Taurus we had Red Shift which was a good universal knowledge check, 601 guts in Gemini is not as universal but still something. Many more trainers had 601 Guts than had Red Shift in Taurus, make whatever conclusion you want from that. I didn't track it but I did keep an eye out for true Guts builds, I saw fewer than 10.
Next are Scenario Run and Date Trained, the biggest difference in the former was that URA-trained horses went way down. Maybe the most shocking finding is that 40% of horses entered in Gemini were trained over a month ago, all the way back in April before Taurus happened, even *before Aries*. This is way higher than the number of "old" horses entered in Taurus and I am struggling to come up with an explanation. Perhaps more trainers are burnt-out and mailing it in. Perhaps more Graded trainers tried Open for the first time and were wondering how well they could do without trying.
Next is wins* of URA/Unity-trained horses VS MANT-trained horses. The asterix is there because I am not counting myself. Wins for URA/Unity went down but they are still viable and I am beginning to think a rating of 13500 is good enough to beat almost anyone with some luck. As long as you have a decent stat line and the necessary skills, you can win even if you have 1000 less rating points.
Finally is the number of Fronts and those with Groundwork and those that were Runaway. No change from the B and below era but Open trainers are generally staying away from Fronts and they are rarely building them "correctly" with Groundwork. Compared to what I am hearing from Graded trainers, they went very heavy on Fronts which pushed Paces out of the conversation, but with the low-ish number of Fronts in Open, Paces could and did shine.
So that's it for Gemini, I'll track Cancer in the same way but with a focus on Xmas Oguri, should be interesting.