Login

u/CashClassic2501

▲ 1 r/filmes

Minissérie odisseia de 1968

https://reddit.com/link/1tfqo1m/video/bio79ks7gp1h1/player

https://reddit.com/link/1tfqo1m/video/czz6aks7gp1h1/player

https://reddit.com/link/1tfqo1m/video/5wyfsec9gp1h1/player

Esta é a minissérie italiana A Odisseia, produzida pela RAI, com Bekim Fehmiu no papel de Odisseu e a atriz grega Irene Papas como Penélope. Essa adaptação é uma das que mais se aproximam do texto de Homero, incluindo quase todos os acontecimentos do livro, como os comedores de lótus, Circe, Calipso, as sereias, a ida ao Hades e o episódio em que os companheiros comem os bois do deus Hélio. Além disso, utiliza muitos dos diálogos da própria Odisseia.

reddit.com
u/CashClassic2501 — 5 days ago
▲ 14 r/evangelion

Anno denied that Evangelion has hidden meanings or intentional philosophical content, but that doesn’t mean the story isn’t profound

https://www.animesenpai.net/evangelion-creator-says-the-series-isnt-deep-just-looks-that-way-in-resurfaced-interview/

Neon Genesis Evangelion does not need to be a philosophical treatise; it needs to tell a story. And that story should explore human situations and emotions. That is how we learn and reflect. In real life, no one speaks in stylized philosophical dialogue like in the plays of William Shakespeare or the novels of Fyodor Dostoevsky. What matters is not turning a work into a philosophical essay—which often makes the story feel forced—but portraying how human beings truly are. That is where Evangelion’s beauty lies.

In human history, there are no hidden meanings—we are the ones who reflect on it. Napoleon Bonaparte did not launch the 1812 campaign against Russia to explore megalomania or an insatiable thirst for power; he simply carried out a military campaign to maintain the Continental Blockade, and it went wrong. We are the ones who learn from and reflect on events, because they do not carry intrinsic meaning—we are the ones who assign meaning to them.

Evangelion does not need to engage with Martin Heidegger to be a deep story.

Its beauty lies precisely in this: we learn about loneliness, family issues, the loss of a mother, and the fear of human connection. We see Asuka Langley Soryu and Shinji Ikari dealing with emotionally distant parents, both shaped by the loss of their mothers. In Asuka’s case, this trauma is even more severe due to her mother’s suicide. Shinji, on the other hand, fears social interaction, yet still finds comfort in his friendships with Toji Suzuhara and Kensuke Aida. Asuka masks her insecurity with arrogance.

u/CashClassic2501 — 20 days ago
▲ 5 r/animebrasil

Não é uma adaptação muito fiel ao original; tem seus desvios, mas são muito menores do que os da versão americana de 2002. A personalidade do conde é muito mais sombria e cruel nessa adaptação (enquanto no livro o conde, apesar de sua crueldade, tem uma faceta boa — por exemplo, poupa a vida de Albert, poupa a vida de Valentine, ajuda a família Morrel e demonstra consideração por Mercédès). Aqui não: ele é puro ódio e deseja se vingar depois de anos de extremo sofrimento.

O conde, diferentemente de outros animes cuja vingança foi suavizada, em Gankutsuou Edmond busca punir seus inimigos e fazê-los sofrer pelo que fizeram com ele até o fim.

https://reddit.com/link/1t1g020/video/0jeupkh2lnyg1/player

https://reddit.com/link/1t1g020/video/dz20ndk4lnyg1/player

reddit.com
u/CashClassic2501 — 20 days ago
▲ 8 r/TheCountofMonteCristo

I was reading complaints about the count’s misogynistic remarks toward Mercédès, particularly when he quoted Hamlet upon learning that she had married, mentioning the line: “Frailty, thy name is woman.” This kind of behavior was not uncommon at the time. Napoleon, in his youth, considered it ridiculous for men to marry women and saw it as a man being dominated by a being inferior in both mind and body. He indeed regarded women as inferior.

Some people believe that the 2002 film “corrected” Dumas’s novel by justifying Mercédès’ pregnancy, but it is important to remember that it was common for women to marry not for love, but for financial reasons. Joséphine herself had no independent income and depended on her lovers; she married Napoleon for financial security. She admitted that she did not love him at first and even read his letters aloud to her friends, mocking him. Dumas understood the society he lived in far better than any modern screenwriter.

And for those who criticize the book for portraying Mercédès as “old,” women over 30 were considered old at that time. Joséphine was said to age prematurely. She married Bonaparte because her window of opportunity was closing, and it was becoming increasingly difficult to find a good husband.

Finally, for those who criticize the count’s colder behavior, such as his emotional distance, Joséphine herself, after surviving the Reign of Terror, became emotionally distant and pragmatic. The experience of that period left lasting trauma on her.

reddit.com
u/CashClassic2501 — 24 days ago