u/ChemSTutor

Edit post comments:

Reading through responses (I appreciate all who replied, it's really helpful), but I realized that the real question is, will the co-op board adjust pricing expectations (minimum) based on the condition of the unit? And is it better to mention before we submit the offer for review?

Link to original: https://www.reddit.com/r/AskNYC_Coops/comments/1qofpdz/would_changing_listing_agents_actually_help_in/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_buttonAppreciate

Thanks to all for the advice on my original post — it helped me make a decision, but now I have a new concern.

At the time, I decided to stay with my original agent because:

  • They were very entrenched in the building (live there, have sold a large portion of units)
  • Ties with the with the co-op board/process
  • Timing (holidays + slow winter market) might have been real deterrents to selling so decided to give it another shot.

So I extended the listing.

After that… I heard nothing. For months. No updates, no feedback, not even a check-in.

That ultimately pushed me to switch agents.

My new agent is local, experienced, responsive, upgraded the photos/marketing — and we got an all-cash offer within days.

The offer

  • All cash
  • Lower than some recent sales
  • But my unit is in significantly worse condition (older, needs major work, long-term sublet)

Context:

Last year, three similar units sold at roughly this same price — and they were in better condition

Higher sales were renovated units with features mine doesn’t have

Here’s where I’m really struggling (and could use input):

1. Financial pressure / board risk

I’m running out of money to carry this — maintenance + mortgage are adding up quickly.

A board rejection would be extremely bad for me financially, so I’m worried about:

  • Whether this price could be seen as “too low”
  • Whether boards actually reject deals for that reason

My current agent says she’s confident it’ll be fine, but I’m still uneasy.

2. Did my previous agent drop the ball — or filter out offers?

This is the part I can’t reconcile

I always thought:

Agents are required to present all offers to the seller — even weak ones, even ones unlikely to get board approval.

So if that’s true, then:

  • I should have at least heard about something over those months

But instead:

  • Zero offers
  • Zero feedback
  • Minimal communication

Then I switch agents → offer within days

So now I’m wondering:

  • Did better marketing/presentation really make that much difference? or
  • Is it possible my original agent didn’t bring me offers he KNEW the board wouldn’t approve?

Current listings in the building

There are still comparable units sitting:

  • Two listed by my original agent
  • Two in worse condition than mine - listed by another agent
  • One in better condition

No idea if those are stuck due to pricing, condition, or board issues.

Main questions:

  • Are listing agents actually required to present every offer, even if they think it won’t pass a co-op board?
  • In co-ops, how common is it for boards to reject deals based on price alone?
  • Does getting an offer within days suggest my previous agent completely neglected the listing (it makes not sense to me, would he not want to make $$)? Can this realistically just be timing + better presentation?

Would really appreciate perspectives

reddit.com
u/ChemSTutor — 1 month ago