u/Chemical_Collar_2341

Hyundai Corporation Holdings (KOSPI: 227840) — the licensing business earns ₩26bn a year and is on the balance sheet at ₩0.1bn

Hyundai Corporation Holdings (KOSPI: 227840) — the licensing business earns ₩26bn a year and is on the balance sheet at ₩0.1bn

Hyundai Corporation Holdings (KOSPI: 227840) licenses the HYUNDAI trademark for electronics, tools and small generators outside Korea. Nothing to do with the carmaker — the rights came from Hynix Semiconductor, the former Hyundai Electronics, in 2007.

That business earned ₩26.0bn of operating profit in the last twelve months. Its net book value is ₩0.1bn.

Both numbers are correct. In 2019 the wider Hyundai family sorted out who legally owns the name, which five separate groups had been using since the old conglomerate broke apart. Holdco transferred the mark to HD Hyundai and took back a thirty-year licence in the same deal, paying all thirty years up front. The sale did not qualify as a sale under the accounting rules, so the mark stayed on the balance sheet with a matching liability against it. The two cancel out.

The setup at ₩12,900:

₩bn
Market cap 117.4
less its listed stake in Hyundai Corporation (011760), at market (85.7)
less net cash (11.4)
left for everything else 20.3

So you pay ₩20.3bn for a division that earned ₩26.0bn, and the frozen meat business, the mushroom farms, the box plants in Cambodia and ₩47bn of other investments come attached.

Royalty revenue has compounded at 12% a year since 2020 and divisional operating profit at 15%. Cost of sales against ₩35.1bn of royalty revenue in FY2025 was ₩17.5m. About 84% of the fees come from third parties, not affiliates.

Ignore reported earnings here. Holdco books a quarter of Hyundai Corporation's profit under the equity method while receiving almost none of the cash, and in Q2 2026 it bought more of those shares at half book value, which the rules make you record as profit on the day you sign. Reported EPS is meaningless. Use operating profit.

Why it might not stay this way. Korea has passed three Commercial Act amendments in twelve months: treasury shares must now be cancelled, the controlling family's vote is capped at 3% when the audit committee is elected, and cumulative voting becomes compulsory above ₩2tn of assets. Only 28.8% of eligible shares voted on the audit committee item in 2026 and 47.6% of the company sits outside the control bloc. March 2027 is the first full cycle under all three.

Why it might. The control bloc is 49.34% under a shareholders' agreement from 2015. The dividend has not moved since 2017 against ₩89.1bn of distributable profit. Free float is about US$39m.

Full write-up with the sum-of-the-parts, eight years of segment data and the charts: https://www.numbersnotnarrative.com/p/hyundai-corporation-holdings-227840

Everything is from DART filings. Long. Prices 19 August 2026.

iScream Media (KOSDAQ: 461300) — 4x earnings, 31% margins, ~10% dividend, but 91% of market cap sits in cash/securities. DD

Been digging through Korean micro-caps on DART and found one that made me re-check my numbers. Sharing the core thesis here.

The business. iScream Media runs iScream S, the daily software ~93% of Korea's primary-school teachers use to run their classrooms — lesson slides, worksheets, a 20-year library of 6.5m teaching materials. It's free. That's the point: it's the front door. Off the back of owning the teacher's daily routine, iScream started publishing certified primary textbooks in 2022 and immediately won the highest adoption of the 13 licensed publishers (~40–58% on maths/science/social studies).

https://preview.redd.it/7t1zs2klzrdh1.png?width=1650&format=png&auto=webp&s=2db8729a4d62fcecb508d1d7b25abb7f6bef550a

Why it's a good business. The state funds textbooks but teachers choose the publisher — and iScream already owns the teacher. Schools re-order every year (recurring, not one-off). Switching means relearning a whole year of materials, so it's sticky. And a rival would have to rebuild 20 years of content and prise teachers off a platform they open daily. That's a real moat.

The numbers. Revenue ₩104bn → ₩196bn in 3 years (~24% CAGR), operating profit ₩31bn → ₩62bn, and — the tell of quality — operating margin rose from 29% to 31.5% as it grew. Return on the capital actually used in the operating business is well over 50% (reported ~30% because the screener counts the huge cash pile as capital). FCF ~₩48bn in FY2025, ~25% of sales.

https://preview.redd.it/p0bdyy9nzrdh1.png?width=1650&format=png&auto=webp&s=65409f207e44b8f70084203fa7d4714afd074c4d

The weird part. Market cap ~₩200bn, but the company sits on ~₩182bn of cash + securities — about 91% of its own market value. Strip that out and the market is pricing the ₩62bn/yr operating business at an EV of roughly ₩8bn — a few million dollars. On paper that's not a valuation, it's a rounding error.

The catch (why it's cheap). Two real reasons. (1) The founding Park family controls ~61% via SigongTech, so no outsider can force that cash out. (2) Revenue rides on government policy — in Aug 2025 the state demoted iScream's AI textbook from "textbook" to "educational material," forcing ~₩13bn of write-offs. But it's being chipped away: under Korea's Value-Up programme iScream now commits to a 40% payout, the dividend more than doubled to a ~10% yield, and total shareholder yield (divs + buybacks) already tops 10% of market cap.

One thing the screeners get flat wrong: they show ~₩111bn of "cash & short-term investments." The real figure is ₩182bn — the difference (~₩70bn+) sits in long-term investments that screens don't count as cash. You only see it if you read the actual filing, and it changes the whole thesis (some of it is in venture funds tied to the founding family).

Not investment advice — I may hold a position. Figures from DART filings FY2022–Q1 2026.

I wrote the full teardown — with the charts, the segment breakdown, the seasonality trap, and the demographic-decline pushback — here: https://numbersnotnarrative.substack.com/p/i-scream-media-93-of-koreas-teachers

Curious if anyone here has a view on whether that cash ever really reaches minorities.

reddit.com
u/Chemical_Collar_2341 — 1 month ago

iScream Media (KOSDAQ: 461300) — 4x earnings, 31% margins, ~10% dividend, and the market values the whole operating business at ~$6m. DD

Been digging through Korean micro-caps on DART and found one that made me re-check my numbers. Sharing the core thesis here.

https://preview.redd.it/t5ncm3bcjddh1.png?width=1650&format=png&auto=webp&s=521d5d6fbc92bad4e662d0d1dc506545e577cf7d

The business. iScream Media runs iScream S, the daily software ~93% of Korea's primary-school teachers use to run their classrooms — lesson slides, worksheets, a 20-year library of 6.5m teaching materials. It's free. That's the point: it's the front door. Off the back of owning the teacher's daily routine, iScream started publishing certified primary textbooks in 2022 and immediately won the highest adoption of the 13 licensed publishers (~40–58% on maths/science/social studies).

Why it's a good business. The state funds textbooks but teachers choose the publisher — and iScream already owns the teacher. Schools re-order every year (recurring, not one-off). Switching means relearning a whole year of materials, so it's sticky. And a rival would have to rebuild 20 years of content and prise teachers off a platform they open daily. That's a real moat.

The numbers. Revenue ₩104bn → ₩196bn in 3 years (~24% CAGR), operating profit ₩31bn → ₩62bn, and — the tell of quality — operating margin rose from 29% to 31.5% as it grew. Return on the capital actually used in the operating business is well over 50% (reported ~30% because the screener counts the huge cash pile as capital). FCF ~₩48bn in FY2025, ~25% of sales.

https://preview.redd.it/sfwa3rxdjddh1.png?width=1650&format=png&auto=webp&s=74cf2de8d70cc2dc44930cc4741dc5c6c05861f3

The weird part. Market cap ~₩200bn, but the company sits on ~₩182bn of cash + securities — about 91% of its own market value. Strip that out and the market is pricing the ₩62bn/yr operating business at an EV of roughly ₩8bn — a few million dollars. On paper that's not a valuation, it's a rounding error.

The catch (why it's cheap). Two real reasons. (1) The founding Park family controls ~61% via SigongTech, so no outsider can force that cash out. (2) Revenue rides on government policy — in Aug 2025 the state demoted iScream's AI textbook from "textbook" to "educational material," forcing ~₩13bn of write-offs. But it's being chipped away: under Korea's Value-Up programme iScream now commits to a 40% payout, the dividend more than doubled to a ~10% yield, and total shareholder yield (divs + buybacks) already tops 10% of market cap.

One thing the screeners get flat wrong: they show ~₩111bn of "cash & short-term investments." The real figure is ₩182bn — the difference (~₩70bn+) sits in long-term investments that screens don't count as cash. You only see it if you read the actual filing, and it changes the whole thesis (some of it is in venture funds tied to the founding family).

Not investment advice — I may hold a position. Figures from DART filings FY2022–Q1 2026.

Curious if anyone here has a view on whether that cash ever really reaches minorities.

 

reddit.com
u/Chemical_Collar_2341 — 1 month ago

iScream Media (KOSDAQ: 461300) — 4x earnings, 31% margins, ~10% dividend, but 91% of market cap sits in cash/securities. DD

Been digging through Korean micro-caps on DART and found one that made me re-check my numbers. Sharing the core thesis here.

The business. iScream Media runs iScream S, the daily software ~93% of Korea's primary-school teachers use to run their classrooms — lesson slides, worksheets, a 20-year library of 6.5m teaching materials. It's free. That's the point: it's the front door. Off the back of owning the teacher's daily routine, iScream started publishing certified primary textbooks in 2022 and immediately won the highest adoption of the 13 licensed publishers (~40–58% on maths/science/social studies).

Why it's a good business. The state funds textbooks but teachers choose the publisher — and iScream already owns the teacher. Schools re-order every year (recurring, not one-off). Switching means relearning a whole year of materials, so it's sticky. And a rival would have to rebuild 20 years of content and prise teachers off a platform they open daily. That's a real moat.

The numbers. Revenue ₩104bn → ₩196bn in 3 years (~24% CAGR), operating profit ₩31bn → ₩62bn, and — the tell of quality — operating margin rose from 29% to 31.5% as it grew. Return on the capital actually used in the operating business is well over 50% (reported ~30% because the screener counts the huge cash pile as capital). FCF ~₩48bn in FY2025, ~25% of sales.

https://preview.redd.it/fkuv201jg8dh1.png?width=1650&format=png&auto=webp&s=722d26c6dbeb23eb2f818f44ef981542df6e46ec

The weird part. Market cap ~₩200bn, but the company sits on ~₩182bn of cash + securities — about 91% of its own market value. Strip that out and the market is pricing the ₩62bn/yr operating business at an EV of roughly ₩8bn — a few million dollars. On paper that's not a valuation, it's a rounding error.

https://preview.redd.it/70oj37pkg8dh1.png?width=1650&format=png&auto=webp&s=2b09e1ae4f39012e92aa91d0169b5b6ddc5a47ab

The catch (why it's cheap). Two real reasons. (1) The founding Park family controls ~61% via SigongTech, so no outsider can force that cash out. (2) Revenue rides on government policy — in Aug 2025 the state demoted iScream's AI textbook from "textbook" to "educational material," forcing ~₩13bn of write-offs. But it's being chipped away: under Korea's Value-Up programme iScream now commits to a 40% payout, the dividend more than doubled to a ~10% yield, and total shareholder yield (divs + buybacks) already tops 10% of market cap.

One thing the screeners get flat wrong: they show ~₩111bn of "cash & short-term investments." The real figure is ₩182bn — the difference (~₩70bn+) sits in long-term investments that screens don't count as cash. You only see it if you read the actual filing, and it changes the whole thesis (some of it is in venture funds tied to the founding family).

Not investment advice — I may hold a position. Figures from DART filings FY2022–Q1 2026.

I wrote the full teardown — with the charts, the segment breakdown, the seasonality trap, and the demographic-decline pushback — here: https://numbersnotnarrative.substack.com/p/i-scream-media-93-of-koreas-teachers

Curious if anyone here has a view on whether that cash ever really reaches minorities.

reddit.com
u/Chemical_Collar_2341 — 1 month ago

iScream Media (KOSDAQ: 461300) — 4x earnings, 31% margins, ~10% dividend, but 91% of market cap sits in cash/securities. DD

Been digging through Korean micro-caps on DART and found one that made me re-check my numbers. Sharing the core thesis here.

The business. iScream Media runs iScream S, the daily software ~93% of Korea's primary-school teachers use to run their classrooms — lesson slides, worksheets, a 20-year library of 6.5m teaching materials. It's free. That's the point: it's the front door. Off the back of owning the teacher's daily routine, iScream started publishing certified primary textbooks in 2022 and immediately won the highest adoption of the 13 licensed publishers (~40–58% on maths/science/social studies).

https://preview.redd.it/njzhlkn8f8dh1.png?width=1650&format=png&auto=webp&s=f03713ad27fa7c1e5b4f49e4c676d6c6536f713b

Why it's a good business. The state funds textbooks but teachers choose the publisher — and iScream already owns the teacher. Schools re-order every year (recurring, not one-off). Switching means relearning a whole year of materials, so it's sticky. And a rival would have to rebuild 20 years of content and prise teachers off a platform they open daily. That's a real moat.

The numbers. Revenue ₩104bn → ₩196bn in 3 years (~24% CAGR), operating profit ₩31bn → ₩62bn, and — the tell of quality — operating margin rose from 29% to 31.5% as it grew. Return on the capital actually used in the operating business is well over 50% (reported ~30% because the screener counts the huge cash pile as capital). FCF ~₩48bn in FY2025, ~25% of sales.

The weird part. Market cap ~₩200bn, but the company sits on ~₩182bn of cash + securities — about 91% of its own market value. Strip that out and the market is pricing the ₩62bn/yr operating business at an EV of roughly ₩8bn — a few million dollars. On paper that's not a valuation, it's a rounding error.

https://preview.redd.it/vuwb874af8dh1.png?width=1650&format=png&auto=webp&s=9e950d8377ff310149ed23f788128237dce44978

The catch (why it's cheap). Two real reasons. (1) The founding Park family controls ~61% via SigongTech, so no outsider can force that cash out. (2) Revenue rides on government policy — in Aug 2025 the state demoted iScream's AI textbook from "textbook" to "educational material," forcing ~₩13bn of write-offs. But it's being chipped away: under Korea's Value-Up programme iScream now commits to a 40% payout, the dividend more than doubled to a ~10% yield, and total shareholder yield (divs + buybacks) already tops 10% of market cap.

One thing the screeners get flat wrong: they show ~₩111bn of "cash & short-term investments." The real figure is ₩182bn — the difference (~₩70bn+) sits in long-term investments that screens don't count as cash. You only see it if you read the actual filing, and it changes the whole thesis (some of it is in venture funds tied to the founding family).

Not investment advice — I may hold a position. Figures from DART filings FY2022–Q1 2026.

I wrote the full teardown — with the charts, the segment breakdown, the seasonality trap, and the demographic-decline pushback — here: https://numbersnotnarrative.substack.com/p/i-scream-media-93-of-koreas-teachers

Curious if anyone here has a view on whether that cash ever really reaches minorities.

reddit.com
u/Chemical_Collar_2341 — 1 month ago
▲ 2 r/smallcaps+1 crossposts

Total Soft Bank (KOSDAQ: 045340) — terminal-operating-system vendor with net cash ≈ 60% of market cap

Despite the name, no relation to the Japanese SoftBank. TSB is a 38-year-old Busan software house whose flagship product, CATOS, is the operating system that runs container terminals — berthing, yard layout, crane/truck scheduling, all in real time. It's installed at 110+ terminals in 20+ countries. Terminal software is brutally sticky: operators are risk-averse, contracts are multi-year, and TSB reckons only ~20 vendors compete globally. Classic picks-and-shovels on global trade.

The reason I'm posting is the valuation. At today's ₩6,790 the market cap is ~₩58bn. The company holds ~₩34bn in net cash (essentially zero debt), so:

  • Net cash ≈ ~60% of market cap
  • EV ≈ ~₩24bn → ~2.5x EV/EBIT on FY2025 operating profit (₩9.4bn)
  • Backlog near all-time highs at ~₩38bn (>1 year of revenue), maintenance slice growing
  • Dividend + buybacks underway (Korea "Value-Up")

Real risks: micro-cap illiquidity, lumpy project revenue, FX swings, and old-guard founder governance (CEO born 1941) — which is a big part of why it's this cheap.

Full write-up with the numbers, backlog chart, balance-sheet detail and risk section here: https://numbersnotnarrative.substack.com/p/the-quiet-korean-software-company

Curious what people think about the governance discount — real trap, or the source of the mispricing?

u/Chemical_Collar_2341 — 1 month ago

This 38-year-old Korean company writes the software behind 110+ container ports — and ~60% of its market cap is cash

Total Soft Bank (KOSDAQ: 045340) is a tiny South Korean company that makes the software brains for global shipping ports.

Its flagship product, CATOS, runs operations at over 110 terminals across 20 countries. Despite the name, it has zero connection to Masayoshi Son's Japanese SoftBank.

The company just posted a massive Q1 2026 report, but the real story is the underlying value:

  • It’s incredibly cheap: The entire company is valued at roughly ₩55–59bn, but they have ₩34bn sitting in the bank and zero debt. Since cash covers 60% of the price tag, you are getting a profitable software business for almost nothing.
  • Growth is surging: First-quarter sales shot up 39% (to ₩7.38bn) with profit margins over 25%. For all of 2025, they cleared ₩9.4bn in profit on ₩27.5bn in sales.
  • Future sales are locked in: They are sitting on a massive ₩38bn backlog of signed contracts from places like Spain, Abu Dhabi, and Malaysia. That guarantees more than a full year of revenue before they even land a new deal.

Read full analysis at: https://numbersnotnarrative.substack.com/p/the-quiet-korean-software-company

u/Chemical_Collar_2341 — 2 months ago