u/Cjakrun80

So today she was revisiting her “dog grooming/Vet Tech” days. And I’m having an issue with what she has said here and there, over the years. Let me just say I know G is a liar but what I can’t grasp, is how her loyal chat doesn’t catch on. C is 5 years old. And we can all agree that from what has been seen since she started her online presence, she hasn’t held a consistent job since he was born. She says the few she had, she was unable to keep because C was difficult and biting and being kicked out of daycares. She has said she couldn’t even hold a WFH job because C was so hard to handle. And we have social media posts from Bean around 2018 stating G was unable to work and had that GFM. And if they have been together “8 or 9 years” because of Bean leaving when C was a baby and that is when G lives with Mimi in Florida but she also states that during this timeframe, she was unable to hold a job due to Cs behavior. So let’s say G was 24-25 when she and Bean initially met- putting the timeline around 2017-2018. We also know G never finished school but technically would have graduated in 2010 or 2011? I believe Dani stated she studied and got her diploma in 2013? And let’s say the rumor about Mimi helping G create a diploma for G by using Ds - so G could work at Petsmart as a groomer and then G claims she moved to Banfield. So the absolute earliest she could have even started working in Vet Med would be around 2013. That makes a 4 year gap for her until Bean enters her life. Can someone help me find these 8 years where G logistically was a Vet Tech? It’s probably not even 8 weeks cumulative. I’m also confused why she hyper fixates on this particular profession in general online. But in legal paperwork, government paperwork/disclosure, she states she had only worked 4 years total doing FMLA related stuff. Which she has NEVER discussed online or claim. She lies about things that can be verified yet these government agencies don’t even verify what she tells them. You would think if someone is a pathological liar and actively lies on government paperwork (EXAMPLE: states she graduated HS)Wouldn’t certain agencies want or need to be aware that she is unable to provide the truth and her claims need to be verified? I assumed there would be some sort of investigation into simple and verifiable information she provided them. You would think that if they know her answers might not be true, maybe they should verify other information she has provided? I hope this makes sense. Like if she tells the court, police or DCFS incorrect information like her medical information, work history, education history- and they are able to confirm or deny that information- they would then be able to have a NOTE within her file that she is untrustworthy with facts and has a tendency to lie since she isn’t able to tell the truth on basic past history. That way- anything she provides or claims moving forward needs to be verified. I just don’t understand how she has multiple DCFS cases and she is still able to lie and they still take her words and statements at face value. It’s ridiculous. She keeps repeating because she has never been held accountable. Ever. She’s just fine tuning her lies.