u/CommitteeCultural480

Hi everyone,

I have a general question about NeurIPS subject-area selection.

Suppose a submitted paper is broadly in the federated learning area, but the authors later realized that their selected area may not have been the best possible fit. How much does this usually affect reviewer matching?

More generally:

1. Are reviewer assignments mainly determined by the selected subject areas, or do title/abstract/full-text matching and reviewer bids also play a major role?
2. If the selected area is reasonable but not ideal, can ACs or reviewer reassignment help correct the match?
3. Has anyone experienced reviewer mismatch mainly because of imperfect area selection?

I am asking about the process in general, not about a specific paper. Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks!