I feel like I gave at least one maybe 2 wrong answers law wise in my interview. The interview itself went well but I just got stuck under the time pressure, I rectified this in the att note.
Seeing as your only tested on skill in the interview and the legal marks come from the note will this be ok? Or will I fail due to saying one thing and writing another?
What approach are people taking with interviewing?
Are we only mentioning ID/cost etc if the instructions say so?
I’ve also noticed the in-house mocks jump into asking for names address email etc - surely it’s unprofessional to ask the name and gives off the vibe you haven’t done any work before meeting a client, also on the introductions as we cannot say our name do we make a name up?
Just feels a bit all over the place for this one due to the lack of structure compared to advocacy
What are people opting for with advocacy? A full scrip or just bullet points?
I feel like I’ve had time to draft a full script when doing mocks, and find this much better as personally with bullet points I just trip myself up and get stuck on my words. But nervous about loosing points reading from a script? Looking at the Kaplan YouTube sample answers they seem to read from a script and just glance up often enough for eye contact - will this be okay?