u/CuriousSkepticalGuy

Maybe the fact that the vast majority of males don't engage in sexual misconducts of any kind means they are doing their part, Florence.

I haven't seen you condemn the actions of Lindsay Clancy. Care to explain why you refuse to demonize the actions of a child serial killer? Don't you know that you are being complicit when you refuse to speak up for the poor little children? And why aren't you demanding that type of support from men who live in arab countries? What about the women that are being abused and oppressed in those countries?

Also, I've read about the alleged gangrape that took place in Cornell University. The woman in question alleges in her original testimony that she tooks drugs willingly, welcomed 3 men into her room in order to engage in an orgy and when 4 men entered the room she felt a level of discomfort, but never asked the guys to leave. 8 depraved individuals engaged in consentual sexual activities, but the whore that helped orchestrate the events is alleging rape, as to prevent the truth from damaging her reputation.

Take a look at her testimony or expert's analysis like the one in the link below:

https://x.com/BridgetAyers/status/2104981238876692554

You couldn't expect the full picture from an industry whose individuals have a feminist bias.

How come an actress who lacks knowledge and experience in the legal department playing arbiter of truth?

John Stewart Senior failed to become a green lantern, so he's training his genetically compatible child to wear the mantle in his place.

John Stewart's parents are so obsessed with turning their kid into a green lantern that he's raised completely isolated from his siblings, his mother tell him about the entire system is rigged against him - because of racial oppression BS that stupid assholes tell their kids in real life - while his dad takes turns shooting apples on his head. Later on, he takes turns shooting apples on top of his parent's heads, to test his ability to function under immense preasure. All of that to raise a child who can overcome fear.

After writing all of that, I think I'm gonna take a break from the internet for a few days.

Source: https://x.com/ARISEforIsrael/status/2094197319583535379

Recently, Hasan sang a song mocking the death of Charlie Kirk in front of hundreds of people, framed a picture of 9/11 on his room, called gamers losers who will never experience marriage and parenthood and encouraged his viewers to kill property owners - saying that the streets should be soaked with their capitalist blood.

Another thing that happened recently involves a democratic party supporter called Shannon Watts, who had her entire wikipedia page altered in order to portray her as a political commentator who is funded by the state of Israel. This happened suspiciously hours after Hasan criticized her for being critical of him.

Here's proof:

https://x.com/shannonrwatts/status/2093737827255177717

This all happened in the past four months alone. If I had to expose the man for every reprehensible thing he said and did since the beginning of his career I'd be writing all day. While Nick Fuentes, Ben Shapiro and Bill Maher can be occasionally annoying with their politically biased takes, Destiny is the only one who deserves to be on that list.

The way Thor delivers this line makes it pretty evident that his attempt to strike Doctor Doom has personal motivations behind it. But as far as we know, these characters have never even met before the events of this movie—whatever the hell the plot is supposed to be.

Who knows?

Thor might have perfectly valid reasons to hate Doom by this point in the movie.

My problem is that, as an audience, we don't have that history with him. Their first movie together already seems to be treating their conflict with the emotional weight of a deeply personal grudge. And that's part of a larger problem I have with Doom's introduction.

A wasteland where New York used to be, inactive Sentinels surrounding the place, Victor being described as a broken man who has gone past the point of repair, etc.

Everything seems to point toward mass genocide. But from an audience standpoint, where is the impact?

A fan-favorite comic book character is going to appear in the MCU for the first time, and we're apparently jumping straight into the consequences of his actions without any of the buildup that would give those actions weight.

Imagine if Thanos had never appeared or even been referenced in a single MCU movie prior to Infinity War. No post-credit scenes. No connection to Loki. No Gamora and Nebula talking about him. Nothing.

Then, Infinity War comes out and this random purple guy we've never seen before massacres the Asgardians, beats Hulk half to death, kills Loki, sacrifices Gamora, kills Vision, wipes out half of all life in the universe and then leaves.

The events wouldn't carry the same weight at all. It would feel less like the culmination of years of buildup within a decade-long story and more like a narrative decision made on the spot: introducing a character at the last minute and speedrunning his entire arc while expecting us to care about him because the story tells us he's important. That's what I think they're gonna do with Doom.

Bringing RDJ back might give the character some immediate emotional weight, but that's borrowed weight. We have nearly two decades of history with Tony Stark, not Victor von Doom. Casting the same actor doesn't automatically transfer that emotional investment from one character to another.

Previous attempts were made, but Marvel's track record is pretty bad. Shuri, Black Falcon, Jane Foster, Yelena and The Avengers themselves. Doom is just a variation of the same problem.

I don't have any expectations for the movie.