No Vet Visit — No Incident: Rover Safety Protocol
Years ago, when I had just started on Rover, a dog in my care suffered severe heat stroke. Rover was made aware of it in graphic detail, and so was the owner. The dog survived, but for reasons unknown to me, the owner refused veterinary care afterward.
And that, apparently, was the correct administrative procedure. Rover never investigated. Never followed up with me or the owner. A dog had just suffered heat stroke to the point of nearly dying, but without a cancellation and a veterinary invoice, we were in the clear 👍
Fast forward to another dog I was sitting who started showing symptoms of a UTI within hours of arriving. The owner scooped up their dog, took them to the vet, was very chill about it, just requested to cancel the remainder of the stay. And suddenly, that was the incident worth investigating.
It’s so backwards it still bugs me. What exactly are they encouraging here? Not taking a dog to the vet?
You know how there’s a way to see a log of all the “cases” Rover has ever opened against you? Well, I checked mine. It’s full of petty things, like cancellations, and not a mention of the heat stroke.