Personalized cold email is not the same as relevant cold email
I think a lot of cold email advice mixes up personalization and relevance.
Personalization is usually something like:
- mentioning a post
- referencing a company page
- using the person's industry
- adding a custom first line
That can help, but it does not automatically make the email relevant.
Relevance is more like:
- this person matches the ICP
- there is a visible reason they might care now
- the problem is likely active, not theoretical
- the offer connects to that moment
- the ask is small enough to answer
The trigger is the part I see people skip.
A list of VP Sales contacts is just a list. A VP Sales who just hired SDRs, has people on the team engaging with outbound tooling, and is posting about pipeline pressure is a much better reason to send something.
The copy can be simpler when the reason is real.
If I cannot explain why this person might care this week, I probably should not be debating the opener yet.
How are people here deciding which leads deserve an email now vs which ones just technically fit the list?