u/Dogemann1366

Trainline investigated over drip pricing

Trainline investigated over drip pricing

Trainline, Virgin Atlantic and RED Driving School are being investigated by the consumer watchdog over concerns they are not showing full prices upfront to customers.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) is examining whether the three companies engaged in so-called 'drip pricing', which is an illegal practice where mandatory fees are not included in the headline price shown to customers.

If the CMA concludes that the firms have broken the law, it can fine them or order them to compensate customers.

The three companies said they were committed to transparency for customers and would engage fully with the CMA.

In the case of Trainline, the CMA said it observed fees of up to £2.79 being added on to headline train fares, and up to £1.50 for coach bookings.

"Both are costs that can add up for frequent travellers," the CMA said.

Trainline has been accused of drip pricing before. In 2023, the Office of Rail and Road said it and six other third-party train ticket sellers were not being upfront about fees.

Emma Cochrane, the CMA's executive director for consumer protection, said: "The first price customers see should be the price they pay.

"At a time when many households are watching every pound they spend, it is important that people are not surprised by extra fees when booking train and coach tickets, holidays or driving lessons."

A Trainline spokesperson said the company was "committed to offering customers a transparent booking experience with clear pricing and genuine value.

"We've proactively engaged with the CMA over several months and we are taking proactive steps to enhance how certain fees are presented to our customers."

Since last year, the CMA has had the power to rule that consumer laws have been broken without having to take businesses to court.

Consumer rights group Which? said the CMA should not hesitate to use these powers, "especially after each firm has already received a warning advisory letter".

Sue Davies, head of consumer rights policy at Which?, said: "Following comments made by the Prime Minister last week that unfair pricing practices have no place in our economy, this move sends a clear message to other businesses to follow the rules.

"At a time when household budgets are under strain, consumers must have confidence that businesses aren't there to rip them off and that the regulator is willing to step in to protect their rights."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyjqe62574o?app-referrer=search

Thoughts? I think that one of GBR's top priorities should be to create a robust, comprehensive and user friendly booking engine and app (including an official implementation of the ridiculous, but NRCoT recognised, practice of split ticketing). I understand something like this is in the works but we'll have to wait and see how it stands up.

In a nationalised and unified system, it would be very embarrassing to have a situation where the best and cheapest way to purchase tickets would be by using a third party booking engine, instead of an official channel. This isn't the case almost anywhere else in Europe.

I think Ze Germans do it well - the DB Navigator app offers comprehensive and integrated travel info and a user friendly booking engine. It's pretty much never better to use a third party for domestic journeys. Granted, their fare system is more simplified than it is here in Britain, but it could be something to aspire towards.

u/Dogemann1366 — 1 day ago

Working group established to explore Caledonian Sleeper links to mainland Europe

A working group has met for the first time to deliver a feasibility study examining the potential for a direct Caledonian Sleeper service to mainland Europe.

The group, comprising representatives from Transport Scotland, Scottish Rail Holdings and Caledonian Sleeper, will oversee the development of a high-level feasibility study exploring the technical and commercial opportunities and challenges associated with extending sleeper rail services to the continent.

The work is being progressed as part of the Scottish Government’s manifesto commitment to commission a feasibility study into options for a Caledonian Sleeper service to Europe.

Cabinet Secretary for Economy, Tourism and Transport, Stephen Flynn said:

“We committed to exploring the potential for a direct Caledonian Sleeper service to mainland Europe and I am pleased that this work is now underway.

“The establishment of this working group marks an important first step in delivering that commitment and will help ensure the feasibility study is informed by the expertise of our rail partners.

“This is an early-stage exercise and the study will focus on understanding the practical, technical and commercial considerations involved. The findings will provide an evidence base to inform any future decisions.”

The working group is expected to report its findings to Ministers later this year.

https://www.transport.gov.scot/news/working-group-established-to-explore-caledonian-sleeper-links-to-mainland-europe/?utm\_source=ig&utm\_medium=social&utm\_content=link\_in\_bio

Certainly a very exciting prospect and possibly one that in theory won't require a huge amount of technical work. Channel Tunnel regulations require trainsets to be 375m long, and I think that the current sets don't fall foul of that, or if they do, not by much, but they may need to attach a rear locomotive so the train is reversable in the event of an emergency. The locomotives are TVM-430 equipped and capable of using the CTRL so I don't think that there's much stopping CS running a set through the Channel Tunnel today.

What I do think will be an issue is the border checks and the length of the journey. There isn't realistically going to be any way of performing border checks at the sleeper's terminals, so it will probably all have to be done on board. It will be interesting to see what solutions are thought up.

Journey times are presently long enough such that it is morning in London when the train arrives. With the maximum speed of the sets being so low, it will probably take another 90 minutes to reach the Channel Tunnel and the sets will end up blocking high speed services using the railway, as they'll be running by the time the sleeper gets to the CTRL. An interesting angle would be running the trains on the 3rd rail 750 DC lines (like the 373s once did) to avoid the CTRL. The locomotives are capable of doing so but it will slow down the journey even more.

In France, the sets will not be able to use the LGV lines and will have to go straight onto the classic lines to their terminals, probably Paris/Brussels/Amsterdam, which will add even more time onto the journeys.

It's a cool idea but I'm not convinced this will go ahead for a very long time, as exciting as it is - but we'll have to see what the Scottish government comes up with. While it would be nice to have a direct sleeper service over to the continent, and I'm sure people would use it, it will probably always be faster and more practical to just use the sleeper to London Euston and board a high speed service over the CTRL to France/Belgium/the Netherlands and beyond.

reddit.com
u/Dogemann1366 — 16 days ago