This is how someone who has no proof of accusations against Celeste’s family reacts when asked for evidence
I came across this one commenter who, under a comment expressing support for the grief the family is feeling, claimed that they had accepted bribes and needed to be thrown in jail. Previous comments made by the user also were vehemently against the parents.
I try to keep an open mind to the discourse surrounding the parents. They may have known of a “boyfriend” but not who he was. However, for serious claims such as them accepting bribes from David or having absolutely zero qualms with Celeste running away to him, I expect to see proof. And even so, in the end, the blame all falls on David (allegedly) for taking an innocent girl’s life.
I found it funny that when confronted head on asking when the parents accepted bribes and where the proof of it was, the commenter backtracks immediately and just says “oh who cares if it was bribes or not, but also I’m making an assumption that that’s what happened.”
But I also wanted to ask you guys why you think people do this? As in why talk out of their asses when they can’t back it up? Because this goes on in the other subs about the case as well. Is it just because they want more people to blame? Is it because they can’t fathom that a young girl would run away from her family while she was groomed for years? Or are they still in denial that David is a monster and it wasn’t all his fault?