I own a heritage property (1840s) in rural Ontario that includes a number of old farm outbuildings (1920s). Shortly before I purchased it, the property was severed, at which time the Municipality created a road widening allowance. The allowance overlaps a 6x6m post & beam shed by 4.3m. The shed abuts another 6x6m post & beam garage (both in poor condition).
The Municipality entered an encroachment agreement with the previous owner that stipulates the shed can still be used. However, a condition of the agreement is that no work shall be done to the shed without Municipal consent. The Municipality can also request the removal of any encroaching structure at the owner’s expense.
The shed is in rough shape: rotted sills, poorly made scarf joints, sagging drystone foundation, etc. It’s entirely clad in tin panels that are keeping it upright. It’s essential storage that can’t be moved or rebuilt anywhere on the property. It’s also part of the built history of the property that adds to its character in its siting (which I want to retain).
I am concerned that seeking permission might trigger unintended consequences, like being asked to demolish. Demolishing may also compromise the abutting garage (also slated for repair of similar issues).
Do I make what structural repairs are possible inside before seeking consent for a full repair? (Difficult)
Having permission to make any necessary repairs to maintain the shed would be ideal, for both cost and efficiency.
Advice welcome.