Cognitive Function Loops

In some cases, loops happen.

https://preview.redd.it/k28f4hdk24tg1.png?width=1087&format=png&auto=webp&s=6ee19ea97c4bc6c0f709d1b99d9885f2dd154fc0

A loop is when, instead of cognitive functions working in pairs of Extraverted and Introverted functions, the user is constantly using both Introverted functions or both Extraverted functions.

This does not happen randomly.

It usually appears as a self-defense mechanism after a long period of:

• stress
• depression
• overload
• repeated hardships

When this happens, the system retreats into what feels safe, familiar, and internally coherent.

Introverted Loop Example — ISFP (Fi–Ni)

An ISFP, for example, will have Fi–Ni working constantly.

Both functions begin feeding into each other in a self-intoxicating loop.

• Fi tells Ni:“This is what I feel I want.”
• Ni replies:“This is what I want.”

Then it reverses:

• Ni asserts:“This is what I want.”
• Fi reinforces:“This makes me feel good.”

With no information being absorbed from the outside through Extraverted functions, a highly subjective judgment atmosphere is created, and the user feels disconnected from reality.

At this point:

• the user is always right from their own perspective
• the user no longer sees anything else

Se is no longer feeding the user with what is actually happening in reality.
The inferior Te is no longer feeding the system with:

• anxious thoughts
• troubling facts
• reality checks

—things that normally feel uncomfortable, but SHOULD exist to keep the ISFP moving forward.

Another Introverted Loop — INTP (Ti–Si)

An INTP experiences a similar mechanism through Ti–Si.

• No new information enters the system.
• Ti feeds interpretations into Si.
• Si feeds familiar internal references back into Ti.

There are:

• no fact checks
• no meaning validation
• no external contradiction

Thought feeds memory.
Memory feeds thought.

The system becomes internally consistent—but sealed.

Extraverted Loop Example — ESFJ (Fe–Ne)

An ESFJ, on the other hand, can fall into an Fe–Ne loop.

In this state, they begin to:

• lose a sense of responsibility
• lose a sense of free will
• become extremely affected by whatever influence exists around them

triggering a feeling of self-disconnection and distance from one's inner-self and identity.

They feel a constant need to:

• involve themselves in meaningless interactions
• lose themselves in other people’s doings
• satisfy external Fe needs endlessly

All of this happens without:

• Si responsibility
• Si meaning-validation
• Ti thoughts and reflections

The absence of Ti + Si removes the healthy anxiety that would normally make them:

• pause
• think twice
• question itself

Again—exactly as Ti + Si always do, and SHOULD do, in the ESFJ’s cognition.

Different Loops, Same Root Cause

As you can see, each set of cognitive functions (each type) produces a different outcome when looping.

• Each loop has its own difficulties
• Each has its own symptoms
• Each behaves differently

And although the specific causes of entering a loop differ from person to person, the core reason is the same:

• stress
• overload
• depression
• dissatisfaction

These states affect not only the inferior function—but the entire psyche.

At that point, the psyche retreats into its:

• most optimistic
• most comfortable
• most confident

functions.

These are:

• the first function — Dominant (Hero / Heroine)
• the third function — Tertiary (Eternal Child / Relief)

For Introverted types, these functions are Introverted.
For Extraverted types, these functions are Extraverted.

Which brings us to the next topic:

Optimistic and Pessimistic Functions, and how they define the Introversion and Extraversion Nature.

https://preview.redd.it/jt4qruv9hksg1.png?width=1024&format=png&auto=webp&s=96b28d6c511111e8774a11fd2edf4bce3b7eaa04

Reader Map

• What the Sensing Framework deals with
• Si as internal continuity and preservation
• Se as external interaction and real-time engagement
• How each fails when isolated
• Si + Se Combined
• Jungian grounding (Appendix)

Sensing Framework

What does the Sensing Framework deal with

Experiential data.

This includes, but not limited to:

• Physical reality
• Sensory input
• Texture, taste, sound, sight, touch
• Bodily states
• Environmental conditions
• Spatial awareness
• Presence
• Tangibility
• Lived experience
• Direct interaction with reality
• What is

Sensing does not deal with:

• meaning
• values
• logical structures
• explanations
• cause → effect abstraction
• possibilities by themselves
• symbolic interpretation

Those belong to other domains.

Si (as lived)

• The continuity of internal sensory experience
• Muscle Memory
• Preservation of past impressions
• Stability of perception over time
• Internal referencing of experience
• Coherence of “what has been”
• Cognitive Memory
• Detached from immediate external stimulation

Se (as lived)

• Direct engagement with the external environment
• Real-time perception of reality
• Reaction to what is happening now
• Interaction with objects and surroundings
• Sudden sensory interactions
• Detached from internal continuity

Let's put the mainstream definitions aside for now

“Si is memory”
“Si is tradition”
“Se is the five senses”
“Se is living in the moment”

While these are true, they're shallow approximations, rather a symptom of a whole function, enormous framework.

Just like Ti is not the logic,
and Fi is not the values,
and Ne isn't the ideas,
Si isn't the memory,
and Se is not the sensation.

They are consequences, symptoms.

And a symptom can be falsely perceived; values can be perceived as values when its merely but a repetitive past experience, tradition, that isn't a real value. Here for example, Si is mistaken by Fi, repetitive experience (What's known and used to - Si) is perceived as (Right and wrong - Values - Fi).

Another example is Nostalgia, at first, we can easily perceive and conclude Nostalgia to be coming fully from Si, and many people do. Yet the intense thing about Nostalgia is that intense meaning and the feeling it carries (or maybe pops up at the moment). Yet this doesn't come from Si, this is Feeling or Intuition domain (Fi/Ni in particular), while Si only brought the details of that scene, memory, in a very accurate and vivid way to trigger Fi or Ni.

That's why we keep on stressing on the difference between Symptoms vs The Function itself.

The goal is the same:

To introduce Sensing as a living system,
not behavior,
not personality,
not stereotypes.

Si — The Continuity of Experience

A field of preserved imprints.

That is Introverted Sensing (Si).

Imagine experience not as something that happens and disappears —
but something that stays.

Every sensation, every moment, every physical state your body is experiencing—
is absorbed and retained.

Si is not perception, Se is, but-
Si is the retention of this perception.

Experience does not pass through Si, it accumulates.

Each moment does not stand alone —
it joins a continuous field.

The field remembers.

Not conceptually and not symbolically.
But physically, experientially.

The body remembers.
The system remembers.

Si does not interpret experience.
Si preserves it.

And because it preserves it,
it does not need to analyze it, explain it, or justify it.

It simply knows:

• what feels familiar
• what feels off
• what aligns with prior experience
• what violates this accumulated continuity

How Si builds its inner continuity

Just like Fi and Ti, Si is internally mirrored.

From the outside, it appears still.
Passive.
Unchanging.

From the inside, it is dense, layer upon layer of stored experience.

Every new input does not overwrite —
it integrates.

Like sediment forming rock, each layer settles and becomes part of the whole.

Nothing resets.

Each experience subtly alters the internal field —
not abruptly,
not consciously,
but permanently.

Patterns are not constructed.
They are felt through repetition.

Once a sensory pattern stabilizes,
it becomes the baseline.

And anything that deviates from it
is immediately recognized.

This is where Si’s stubbornness comes from.

Not resistance —
but again, like every other introverted function, continuity.

This is what they mean by “Si is subjective”

Subjective does not mean wrong.
It means internally referenced.

Si does not ask:

“What is happening right now?”
“What is new?”
“What is different?”
"I shall adapt"

Those belong to Se.

Si asks:

“Does this match what I know?”

And if it doesn’t, it feels wrong — not logically, not emotionally,
but physically off.

Just like Ti rejects incoherence,
and Fi rejects misalignment,
Si rejects discontinuity of experience and what is Trusted.

Si and “mere sensory input”

Si does not seek stimulation, Stimulation is secondary.

What matters is consistency of experience.

This is why Si users often appear:

• resistant to sudden change
• comfort-oriented
• detail-stable
• anchored in familiarity

Not because they reject reality —
but because reality must fit this continuity.

Now,

Si cannot selectively remove experience.

If a core sensory pattern is disrupted, the entire continuity destabilizes.

If this disorientation touches a momentary thing, unsuitable atmosphere, it comes as feeling of discomfort.
However, if this disorientation hits memory level, deep and solid structured systems the users have, this is enough to trigger an unhealthy or unconscious response from the user.

And ultimately, if the system of the Si is challenged, if it's going to the direction of "What is known is wrong", when continuity is lost, then just like Ti, Fi, and Ni systems, it leads to complete disorientation of this framework reality.

Si losing continuity feels like:

• instability
• physical unease
• loss of grounding
• internal misalignment
• sense of unknown

and the sense of unknown for the Si can be nothing less than mentally devastating.

Se — The Architecture of Reality

Si is the archive.
Se is the impact.

Se does not preserve, Se engages.

Se does not store reality —
it interacts with it, on spot, right here and now.

It sees what is here, it responds to it.

A sudden physical occurrence? A sudden physical stimulus?
This is where Se blooms

Se is not memory, Se is contact.

A contact with the physical environment, with sounds, with smells, with physical changes, with sceneries, even a beam of light or a breeze of wind triggers Se... and from there, it's channeled to Fi to give an intense emotional feeling, or it's channeled to Ni to give existential spark, or to Ti sparking a series of thoughts... endless possibilities of complicated elegant cognitive system.

Se, by itself, stripped from everything else

Se does not reference the past.
It does not stabilize experience.
It does not preserve continuity.

It reacts.

Moment to moment.
Stimulus to stimulus.

Se feels alive in intensity.
In movement.
In immediacy.

But Se alone does not know:

• what is stable
• what is consistent
• what should persist

It only knows what is present.

Se alone, stripped from other functions, won't spot a change in environment. But a high Se user, naturally, carries a relatively strong Si as well. Si acts as the physical memory, Se spots this change due to its unmatchable awareness of the environment.

Se doesn’t see continuity — it sees reality

Se does not ask:

“Does this match?”

It asks:

“What is here?”
“What is happening?”
“What can be acted on?”

This is its strength.
And its limitation.

Because interaction without continuity
becomes impulsivity.

Addiction to dopamine, always seeking the new, never settling, never committing.
Stability blindness, no risk assessment, impulsive to the core.

The emptiness of Se — and its strength

Se is empty of memory.

And that emptiness is dangerous.

But it is also what allows Se to:

• adapt instantly
• react precisely
• engage fully
• act without hesitation

Se does not carry the past.
It meets the present.

How each fails in isolation

Si alone risks:

• rigidity
• stagnation
• resistance to change
• over-attachment to familiarity
• socially stiff

Se alone risks:

• impulsiveness
• instability
• lack of grounding
• short-lived engagement

One freezes reality into repetition.
The other dissolves it into constant motion.

An Si Problem

Si can be stuck in the familiar so much that it becomes both bored and boring socially. It's not like they don't need new experiences, but they simply don't acquire any due to the lack of Se. Thus, the users can be stuck in the familiar too much, leading to depression and lack of interest. Not only that, but they can also be overly insecure about anything new or exciting or any new experience or interest or social activity due to the anxiety of anything new, making them very stiff and hard to deal with socially, which often pushes people away. Specially with the optimistic Si users that would rather stick to their Si than dropping it for the sake of other functions.

And again, as we mentioned in earlier post, this forms different dynamics in different cognitive slots. An ESFJ for example, depending on cognitive development, might feel socially unwanted, or just not enough as they need, Fe hero triggered, in return Se critic will use this opportunity to point out the Si's insecurity for experiencing new things, both Si and Se here (In ESFJ users), are pessimistic slots. The result of this dynamic is an ESFJ indulging in new experiences, one after another without stop, the limits that usually grounded them are also gone, a loop of Fe-Ne, a reaction to the Fe hero trigger and Si pessimistic insecurity.

An Se Problem

Se can indulge itself in experiencing without limits, while Si is stuck, Se is the exact opposite... and not in a good way either. While experiencing new stuff is good sometimes, grounding one's self, and settling is also good sometimes. Middle ground is always the optimal option. Afterall, interest cannot be acquired without allowing yourself to experience things, but also meaning cannot be acquired without settling. On one side there is interest and excitement, on the other there is meaning and value. An Se stripped from Si can lead to feeling of emptiness, and this emptiness will lead to even more Se activity, because stopping means acknowledging this emptiness, which is no fun game.

This chain reaction is just another symptom of this complicated system, another small part of a huge dynamical network that determines our cognitive functioning as we go on with out lives.

When the sensing process diverges

When experience conflicts:

Si retreats inward, holding onto what is known.

Se pushes outward, engaging with what is present.

Si preserves. Se reacts.

Both operate but in opposite directions.

The ultimate combination: Si + Se

The healthiest Sensing framework is Si and Se combined —
feeding into each other, correcting each other.

Si gives stability.
Se gives adaptability.

Si gives continuity.
Se gives immediacy.

Si prevents chaos.
Se prevents stagnation.

Si overwhelmed
Se re-engages reality

Se unstable
Si restores grounding

And when Se feels empty Si provides warm continuity to fall back to.

Scope note

This model describes cognitive tendencies — not awareness, intelligence, or capability.

Final synthesis

• Si alone preserves continuity and risks stagnation.
• Se alone engages reality and risks instability.
• Together, they produce grounded interaction with reality.

Continuity without engagement stagnates.
Engagement without continuity destabilizes.

Appendix — Introverted Sensing (Si): Jungian References

Referenced themes include:

• Orientation toward subjective sensation
• Preservation of experience
• Stability of perception
• Inner referencing of reality

“Introverted sensation is determined by the subjective factor.”
“It relates to the internal impression of the object.”
“It preserves the sensory experience.”

Appendix — Extraverted Sensing (Se): Jungian References

Referenced themes include:

• Orientation toward objective reality
• Immediate perception
• Engagement with the external world
• Adaptation to present conditions

“Extraverted sensation is oriented by objective reality.”
“It is concerned with what is actual.”
“Its danger lies in overindulgence in the present moment.”

https://preview.redd.it/3467mqbaxdsg1.png?width=1536&format=png&auto=webp&s=e9633803fbd14f5a129fa2b6ba56a6045e4a0f07

Reader Map

• What the Intuition Framework deals with
• Ni as internal convergence and inevitability
• Ne as external expansion and possibility-mapping
• How each fails when isolated
• Ni + Ne combined
• Jungian grounding (Appendix)

Intuition Framework

What does the Intuition Framework deal with

Potential-oriented data.
This includes, but is not limited to:
• Meaning before evidence
• Direction
• Pattern continuity
• Implicit trajectories
• Latent outcomes
• Symbolic significance
• What could be rather than what is
• Emergence
• Anticipation
• Underlying movement of reality
• Conceptual gravity
• The unseen structure behind appearances

Intuition does not deal with:
• sensory facts
• concrete detail
• step-by-step explanation
• verification
• execution
• emotional valuation
• logical proof
• correctness

Those belong to other domains.

Ni (as lived)

• Internal convergence of meaning
• Collapsing many signals into one direction
• Perception of inevitability
• Temporal compression
• Singular vision
• Pattern closure
• Meaning density
• Internal symbolic coherence
• Direction without evidence

Ne (as lived)

• External expansion of meaning
• Proliferation of possibilities
• Pattern divergence
• Conceptual exploration
• Associative breadth
• Option generation
• Hypothetical movement
• Multiple futures at once
• Directional openness

Forget the mainstream definitions

Forget:
“Ni is future prediction”
“Ni is insight”
“Ne is creativity”
“Ne is brainstorming”

These are surface artifacts, not the structure.

Just like empathy is not Fe, and values are not Fi, insight is not Ni, and ideas are not Ne.
They are consequences.

The aim here — again — is to introduce the cognitive functions as living individually interconnected systems, not traits, not skills, not stereotypes.

Ni — Search For Meaning

A funnel. A singularity. A narrowing corridor of inevitability.

That is Introverted Intuition (Ni).

Ni is not imagination. Ni is not speculation. Ni is not creativity.
Ni is convergence.

Imagine countless signals — sensory impressions, memories, symbols, patterns, concepts — all collapsing inward.

Ni does not examine them. It does not sort them. It does not list them.
It compresses, from this compression, a direction emerges.

Not a choice. Not a guess. A sense of this is where it goes, this is what's meant to be.

Ni does not see multiple futures. It sees one trajectory.

And that trajectory feels:
• unavoidable
• self-evident
• heavy
• quiet
• unquestionable

Ni does not explain why it knows. It often cannot.
It simply knows where this is heading, Vision.

How Ni builds its inner continuity

Just like Fi and Ti, Ni is internally mirrored.

From the outside, Ni looks empty. Detached. Vague. Inactive.
From the inside, it is dense beyond measure.

A closed system of symbols, constantly folding inward, reflecting, resonating, aligning.

Information enters Ni indirectly — through Se, Ne, Te, Fe, or shifting from another introverted function— but this information, once inside, it loses its original form.

Facts dissolve. Details evaporate. Only direction survives. Ni does not store data. Ni stores trajectory. Once a trajectory forms, it gains inertia. And just like a river cannot flow uphill, Ni cannot unsee a direction once it crystallizes.

This is where Ni’s stubbornness comes from. Not ego. Not rigidity. But pattern, vision, direction inevitability. All align perfectly, it carries so much confident it all feels like heavenly ultimate fate.

This is what they mean by “Ni is subjective”

Subjective does not mean imaginary. It means internally anchored.

Ni does not ask:
“What is possible?”
“What could happen?”
“What are the options?”

Those belong to Ne.

Ni doesn't ask, Ni only provides the answer for:
“Where is this going?”

But without even the question!

Just like Ti rejects data that breaks structure, and Fi rejects emotion that violates value, Ni rejects possibilities that violate trajectory. Because this trajectory is so perfectly aligned with everything else, it's not longer visions and thoughts, it's Fate.

Ni and “vision”

Ni does not seek vision. Vision emerges as a byproduct of compression.

This is why Ni users often appear:
• slow to speak
• vague in explanation
• overly certain without proof
• disconnected from present reality

Not because Ni lacks clarity — but because clarity exists before language.

Ni sees the end before the beginning has unfolded. It sees answers before questions.

Now the critical note

Ni cannot branch.

Once locked, it cannot entertain alternatives without destabilizing itself.

If the trajectory collapses — if the “inevitable future” proves false — Ni does not merely adjust. It collapses internally.

This is not disappointment. This is disorientation at the level of meaning itself.

Just like Ti losing its structure or Fi losing its value compass, Ni losing its trajectory feels like:
• confusion
• paralysis
• loss of purpose
• existential fog

Ne — The Architecture of Possibility

Ni is the funnel. Ne is the explosion.

Ne does not converge. Ne radiates.

And while "Diverges" here can be used, divergent leads to multiple unconnected paths, separated and different from each other and the source as well. But Ne radiates, the products of its process are interconnected, and all carry that scent and essence of their source.

Ne sees:
• What could connect to what
• Why this becomes something else
• Why one idea mutates into ten

Ne does not see inevitability in anything. It always sees the openness.

Where Ni narrows, Ne expands. Where Ni closes, Ne opens.

Ne does not seek direction — it seeks movement.

Ne, by itself, stripped from everything else

Ne does not choose. It does not commit. It does not conclude.
It generates.

Possibility after possibility after possibility.

Ne feels alive when the field is open. It suffocates when constrained.

But Ne alone does not know:
• which path matters
• which direction is meaningful
• which future is worth pursuing

It sees all futures — and therefore, none carry weight.

Ne doesn’t see destiny — it sees options

Ne does not ask:
“Where is this going?”

It asks:
“What else could this be?”
“What if this changed?”
“What if we flipped it?”
“What if this connects to that?”

This is its brilliance. And its danger.

Because expansion without convergence becomes diffusion.

The emptiness of Ne — and its strength

Ne is empty of direction.

But it is also what allows Ne to:
• adapt
• innovate
• reframe
• escape rigid trajectories

Ne does not commit to meaning. It keeps meaning fluid, so it's never devastated like Ni would it loses direction, rather it's often optimist.

How each fails in isolation

Ni alone risks:
• tunnel vision
• fatalism
• detachment from reality
• collapse when wrong

Ne alone risks:
• meaninglessness
• indecision
• fragmentation
• endless exploration with no arrival

One freezes reality into a single line, even if it's not the optimal.
The other dissolves reality into infinite branches, even when the optimal was already discovered.

When the intuition process diverges

When multiple futures conflict:

Ni eliminates. Ne multiplies.

Ni retreats inward until one survives. Ne expands outward until none dominate.

Both suffer — differently.

The ultimate combination: Ni + Ne

The healthiest Intuition framework is Ni and Ne together.

Ni gives direction. Ne gives alternatives.
Ni gives meaning. Ne gives flexibility.
Ni prevents chaos. Ne prevents blindness.
Ni overwhelmed — Ne reopens the field.
Ne scattered — Ni collapses it into purpose.

This is intuition at its most alive: directional, yet adaptable.

Scope note

This model describes cognitive orientation, not intelligence, creativity, wisdom, or correctness.

Final synthesis

• Ni alone preserves inevitability and risks collapse.
• Ne alone preserves possibility and risks emptiness.
• Together, they produce meaningful foresight.

Convergence without expansion blinds.
Expansion without convergence dissolves.

Appendix — Introverted Intuition (Ni): Jungian References

Psychological Types by Carl Jung

Referenced themes include:
• Orientation toward inner images
• Perception of unconscious processes
• Compression of experience
• Vision without explanation
• Detachment from sensory reality

“Introverted intuition perceives the images arising from the a priori, i.e. the inherited foundations of the unconscious.”
“It sees the way in which things will develop.”
“It is directed inward, toward the image.”

Appendix — Extraverted Intuition (Ne): Jungian References

Collected Works, Volume 6

Referenced themes include:
• Orientation toward objective possibilities
• Exploration of the external world
• Instability of direction
• Creative expansion
• Difficulty with commitment

“Extraverted intuition is oriented by objective possibilities.”
“It seizes upon every new possibility.”
“Its danger lies in dispersion and loss of direction.”