u/Elegant_Control271

How we run an AI-native company

Recently realised our company became “AI-native” almost by accident lol.

At first we weren’t trying to build some futuristic AI company or whatever. We just got annoyed at how messy normal company operations are.

  • Files everywhere.
  • Random Google Drive folders.
  • People asking “where’s the latest version”.
  • Stuff getting lost in chats.
  • Same work being repeated again and again.

So over time we changed how we work internally.

Now basically the whole company runs on a file-based system. Think of it like a super organised shared workspace instead of random folders everywhere.

Every new client/project gets its own dedicated workspace from day 1:

  • docs
  • meeting notes
  • project files
  • workflows
  • research
  • internal notes
  • reusable stuff

Everything stays there and everyone works from the same place.

The surprising part is this made AI WAY more useful. Yes, we heavily use Claude and Codex, and some local models, so these can read our data much easier, and have a better understanding of what we are doing, and what we are going to achieve.

Because once things are structured properly, AI can actually help across the company knowledge instead of just answering random prompts.

Whenever we discover something useful in a project, we try to turn it into something reusable:

  • templates
  • docs
  • workflows
  • internal tools
  • writing structures
  • automation steps

So instead of restarting from zero every time, the company slowly compounds knowledge.

One example that made this really click for us:

A deep-tech client shared their Google Drive with us so we could understand their company and products better.

Normally someone would manually dig through hundreds of files/slides/docs.

Instead we built internal tools to help organise and understand their authorised materials:

  • old decks
  • technical docs
  • video transcripts
  • writing style
  • terminology
  • visual preferences

Soon after we made a new deck for them.

The client was genuinely shocked because it already felt like something their own internal team would make. Same tone, same structure, same style.

That’s when we realised most companies are trying to use AI on top of chaos.

But AI becomes much more powerful if the company itself is structured in a way that AI can actually work with.

Feels like a lot of SMEs still operate mainly through chats + folders + memory tbh.

Curious if anyone else here is experimenting with similar workflows. If you have any questions, we are happy to answer.

reddit.com
u/Elegant_Control271 — 3 days ago

Been working with a SG-based B2B company (long sales cycle, deep technical product). Pretty typical setup — WordPress, a lot of plugins, some old pages.

Honestly thought content would be the main lever, but something else moved first.

  1. Site was loading ~10s on mobile:
    We didn’t touch content at all — just:
  • removed unused plugins
  • fixed font loading
  • compressed images

PageSpeed went from ~50 → 80+

Within ~2 weeks:

  • clicks up ~50%
  • no new articles published

Didn’t expect speed alone to move that much.

(Most SME sites I see are quite similar — plugin-heavy and slow, but nobody really notices until traffic comes in.)

  1. Second thing that surprised me:

They had 18 webinars / demos sitting there — just video, no text.

We turned them into simple writeups (summary + FAQs from transcripts).
Some started showing up when people compare options within ~2 weeks.

Also realised something quite basic:

One page was getting ~1,800 views/week on Google, but almost nobody clicked.

The way it appeared on Google was written in “company speak”, not how buyers actually search.

Rewrote it → clicks jumped noticeably within days.

  1. The jargon trap:

One industry acronym had ~670 views/week, page 1 ranking, zero clicks — because nobody explained it in plain language.

Published one simple explainer page → started getting clicks within a few days.

Overall after ~1 month (screenshot for context):

  • clicks: 114 → 210
  • impressions: +43%
  • ranking: page 2 → top of page 1

Still early, but the compounding is quite real.

https://preview.redd.it/win3zv3wu1zg1.jpg?width=1882&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=36f176a5103ccdeae4a04452df997014df098b21

Big takeaway for me so far:

  • speed matters more than expected
  • a lot of “content” already exists inside demos/webinars
  • sometimes it’s not ranking problem, it’s messaging problem

For your business —

do you actually get leads from your website, or mostly referrals / WhatsApp?

reddit.com
u/Elegant_Control271 — 18 days ago
▲ 16 r/smeSingapore+1 crossposts

I was comparing PSG solutions and got curious — how good are the vendor websites themselves? So I ran all 278 of them through Google PageSpeed Insights (Google’s free website speed test) on mobile.

What I found:

PSG Vendors (278 sites)
Median score 47 / 100
Scored below 50 (“poor”) 54%
Scored above 90 (“good”) 3%
Couldn’t even load 4 sites

What’s making them slow:

  1. Heavy website builders stacking up code the site doesn’t actually need
  2. Images that aren’t compressed or sized properly
  3. Pages loading too many scripts at once before showing any content
  4. Some sites took over 10 seconds just to show the main content on mobile

Why this should matter to SMEs:

Google uses website speed as one of its ranking factors. Slower site = lower in search results = fewer customers finding you. If your vendor’s own website can’t score well on Google’s own test, it’s fair to ask what your website will look like after they build it.

You can test any website yourself for free — just go to pagespeed.web.dev and paste the URL. Takes 30 seconds.

For details, this is our comprehensive analysis: https://knoyi.com/guides/sg-b2b-performance-benchmark-2026/

reddit.com
u/Elegant_Control271 — 25 days ago