Youtube video full of blabber
This video is full of nonsense; what could the statement "An ultimate objective can be correct" mean? There's no reason why it would mean anything, so clearly moral statements are meaningless. And there's also the fact that we don't all have the same ultimate moral objectives. Contrary to the widespread misconception, "morality" and "ethics" are interchangeable words. The correct definitions of morality are as follows: 1. The branch of philosophy or subject concerned with how you want all sentient beings to be treated by all rational agents (including yourself), when you are in a completely impartial state of mind, that is, a state of mind which makes the issue of whether it's you or someone else deciding what to do in the scenario in question irrelevant. 2. A set of ultimate objectives regarding the matter mentioned in the first definition. 3. The faculty that consists of your set of ultimate moral objectives.
The important thing that all sets of ultimate objectives that are designated moralities by the agents whose sets of ultimate objectives they are have in common is that the fit the second definition given above. All such sets of ultimate objectives advocated by rational agents are of profound sociological importance.https://youtu.be/3X0OiWs\_2dA