I wrote a framework as a lens, not a dogma. I'm looking for constructive criticism, not followers.
I wrote down a way of looking at reality that I arrived at on my own, with no background in philosophy. I'm not selling anything, I'm not asking anyone to believe anything, and I'm not looking for people to follow it. I'm looking for the opposite: curious people willing to attack it.
The core idea, briefly: everything that can be already is, and we are born with our access to reality blurred. What we call discovery is not creation from nothing, but the clearing of something that was already there. The rest follows from that.
I know from the start that the text is limited by my own language, and that there may be resemblances to things others thought before me. I didn't research in that direction; this is strictly my own view.
I don't want to promote it, only to make it visible. From you I'd like:
- Seen as a useful lens rather than an absolute truth, does it hold together, or does it break somewhere?
- Where does it get unclear, contradictory, or too vague?
- What would you cut or add?
The text is bilingual, English and Romanian side by side. It reads in a few minutes. I appreciate honesty and hard criticism.
The text can be read here: https://escentia.world