u/ExplanationWild2198

Hey everyone! We've been building https://gitready.app, an AI-based interview prep platform for engineers and I’d genuinely love feedback from this community.

The problem we kept seeing was that interview prep is fragmented. Most tools help with only one piece:

• DSA practice,
• Resume review,
• System design or
• Mock interviews.

But candidates usually fail because of the combination: weak profile signaling, unfocused prep, and poor articulation during interviews. So, we built GitReady as one connected system:

• Audit → analyzes your GitHub + resume across signals recruiters/interviewers actually screen for, then suggests the highest-impact fixes.
• Learn → Socratic AI tutor for HLD, LLD, DSA, and behavioral prep with 360+ guided concepts.
• Mock Interviews → AI interviews with whiteboard, live coding support, scoring, and detailed feedback after each session.

One thing we got completely wrong initially: our first mock interviewer was too “nice.” It accepted vague answers, didn’t push back, and let candidates move forward without defending tradeoffs which is the opposite of real interviews. We rebuilt it to behave more like an actual interviewer: challenge assumptions, probe depth, and evaluate articulation instead of just correctness.

Pricing-wise: the audit, learning content, and AI tutor are free without a credit card. Paid plans mainly increase usage limits.

Would genuinely love feedback on two things:

1. Does the learning flow/content structure feel useful?
2. Does the AI tutor interaction actually help you think better, or does it still feel “generic AI”?

Happy to answer anything about the build, architecture, mistakes in comments.

Hey everyone,
I built GitReady and I'm looking for a small group to break it before I push it any harder.

The why: I watched too many engineers (me included) prep for interviews the same broken way. Grind LeetCode, skim a system design post, walk in, and have no real idea which round was going to sink them. Then a rejection lands and you get nothing back. No idea what was actually weak.

So GitReady is one honest loop, and all of it happens before the interview:
Audit:
paste your GitHub, drop your resume. It scores you 0 to 100 on four signals (Visibility, Credibility, Narrative Coherence, AI Readiness) and names your highest-leverage fixes. Takes about 90 seconds.
Drill:
a Socratic AI tutor that won't leave you stuck. It gives as many worked examples as you need until it clicks, and you can switch to your native language anytime.
Mock:
a live AI interviewer that runs your code against real tests, pushes on your trade-offs, and scores the transcript.

No interview copilots, nothing whispered in your ear during the real thing. The opposite of that.

What I actually want you to test and tell me:

- The audit. Does the score feel believable? Are the fixes genuinely useful, or generic?
- Onboarding. Where do you get confused or stuck?
- The mock. Does it feel like a real interviewer, or does it let you off easy?
- Anything that breaks, 404s, or just feels off.

The ask: a handful of testers. It's free. Signup credits cover the audit, your score, practice, and a slice of the tutor, with no credit card. The first 10 testers get a bundle of extra audit, mock-interview, and AI-tutor credits as a thank-you. In return I want a brutal, honest reaction, even if it's two lines. Happy to hop on a 10-minute call if you're up for it.

Honest disclosure: it's early, and parts of it are rough. Brutal feedback is the whole reason I'm posting.

Link: https://gitready.app

Comment and I'll make sure you're sorted. Tear it apart.