Rewatch Opinions

I decided to rewatch SW and at Season 4 I was reminded of my initial observations that I had forgotten as the series reached season 20. First, Kody was truly a different person in the first couple of seasons. Much less frenetic and angry- even less mouthy. This supports the claim that once he started using steroids he became increasingly obnoxious and selfish. Secondly, Meri cried all the time- her face would turn red and out came the tears as she frequently nterpreted many comments and opinions as directed at her and wanted to talk about how much SHE has suffered. Her constant snarky comments towards Janelle and Christine were unnecessary.

reddit.com
u/Few-Bat-4921 — 4 days ago

“Prohibitionists Packed the DEA Hearing to Keep Marijuana in Schedule I. Their Own Witnesses Made the Case for Schedule III.” Sheriff Honsal Testimony

An excerpt from an Article in High Times Magazine states that:

Prohibitionists Packed the DEA Hearing to Keep Marijuana in Schedule I. Their Own Witnesses Made the Case for Schedule III

“The states of Nebraska, Idaho and Indiana called Humboldt County Sheriff William Honsal to make a straightforward argument: that legal cannabis fuels crime, and that federal rescheduling would make it worse. Honsal runs law enforcement in the heart of California’s Emerald Triangle, the most storied weed-growing region in the country. If anyone could tell a federal tribunal that legalization bred lawlessness, it was supposed to be him.

Then the Justice Department got him on cross-examination, and he complicated his own side’s theory. Regulated cannabis can help law enforcement, Honsal told the tribunal, and most of the California product diverted to other states comes from unlicensed operators, not the legal market. That is according to attorneys from Vicente LLP who were in the room. It did not erase every concern in the states’ filing. But it undercut a central implication of their crime argument, that the regulated market itself was the engine of the crime they described.”

https://hightimes.com/analysis/dea-marijuana-rescheduling-hearing-opposition-witnesses/

u/Few-Bat-4921 — 1 month ago

Public Defender Management

Serious question for those working in public defense:

Why do so many managing attorneys/public defender leaders resist acknowledging that legal expertise does not automatically translate into expertise in operations, personnel management, budgeting, HR compliance, workflow systems, technology, or organizational administration?

In many PD offices, non-attorney administrative staff are hired specifically because they possess specialized knowledge in these areas. Yet there often seems to be reluctance to fully delegate operational authority or recognize those functions as professional disciplines requiring their own expertise.

What I find interesting is that many other high-stakes professions seem far more comfortable acknowledging operational specialization.

In healthcare, physicians rely heavily on hospital administrators, compliance officers, HR professionals, IT specialists, finance teams, and operations leadership.

In aerospace and engineering, highly skilled engineers still depend on project managers, safety/compliance experts, logistics specialists, operations teams, and systems coordinators.

Those professions do not appear to view operational expertise as diminishing the authority or intelligence of the primary professionals. It is understood that large, complex organizations require multiple forms of expertise to function effectively.

So why does public defense often seem different?

Is it:

law school culture?

the adversarial nature of the profession?

fear of losing authority/control?

lack of formal management training?

chronic understaffing?

public sector culture?

ethical/liability concerns?

or something else entirely?

I’m genuinely curious how other offices navigate the divide between legal leadership and operational leadership — especially in high-volume, under-resourced environments.

reddit.com
u/Few-Bat-4921 — 3 months ago